Cargando…

Comparative radiographic analysis of three-dimensional innate mobility of the foot bones under axial loading of humans and African great apes

The human foot is considered to be morphologically adapted for habitual bipedal locomotion. However, how the mobility and mechanical interaction of the human foot with the ground under a weight-bearing condition differ from those of African great apes is not well understood. We compared three-dimens...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Negishi, Takuo, Ito, Kohta, Hosoda, Koh, Nagura, Takeo, Ota, Tomohiko, Imanishi, Nobuaki, Jinzaki, Masahiro, Oishi, Motoharu, Ogihara, Naomichi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8596007/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34804579
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.211344
_version_ 1784600269205536768
author Negishi, Takuo
Ito, Kohta
Hosoda, Koh
Nagura, Takeo
Ota, Tomohiko
Imanishi, Nobuaki
Jinzaki, Masahiro
Oishi, Motoharu
Ogihara, Naomichi
author_facet Negishi, Takuo
Ito, Kohta
Hosoda, Koh
Nagura, Takeo
Ota, Tomohiko
Imanishi, Nobuaki
Jinzaki, Masahiro
Oishi, Motoharu
Ogihara, Naomichi
author_sort Negishi, Takuo
collection PubMed
description The human foot is considered to be morphologically adapted for habitual bipedal locomotion. However, how the mobility and mechanical interaction of the human foot with the ground under a weight-bearing condition differ from those of African great apes is not well understood. We compared three-dimensional (3D) bone kinematics of cadaver feet under axial loading of humans and African great apes using a biplanar X-ray fluoroscopy system. The calcaneus was everted and the talus and tibia were internally rotated in the human foot, but such coupling motion was much smaller in the feet of African great apes, possibly due to the difference in morphology of the foot bones and articular surfaces. This study also found that the changes in the length of the longitudinal arch were larger in the human foot than in the feet of chimpanzees and gorillas, indicating that the human foot is more deformable, possibly to allow storage and release of the elastic energy during locomotion. The coupling motion of the calcaneus and the tibia, and the larger capacity to be flattened due to axial loading observed in the human foot are possibly morphological adaptations for habitual bipedal locomotion that has evolved in the human lineage.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8596007
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85960072021-11-19 Comparative radiographic analysis of three-dimensional innate mobility of the foot bones under axial loading of humans and African great apes Negishi, Takuo Ito, Kohta Hosoda, Koh Nagura, Takeo Ota, Tomohiko Imanishi, Nobuaki Jinzaki, Masahiro Oishi, Motoharu Ogihara, Naomichi R Soc Open Sci Organismal and Evolutionary Biology The human foot is considered to be morphologically adapted for habitual bipedal locomotion. However, how the mobility and mechanical interaction of the human foot with the ground under a weight-bearing condition differ from those of African great apes is not well understood. We compared three-dimensional (3D) bone kinematics of cadaver feet under axial loading of humans and African great apes using a biplanar X-ray fluoroscopy system. The calcaneus was everted and the talus and tibia were internally rotated in the human foot, but such coupling motion was much smaller in the feet of African great apes, possibly due to the difference in morphology of the foot bones and articular surfaces. This study also found that the changes in the length of the longitudinal arch were larger in the human foot than in the feet of chimpanzees and gorillas, indicating that the human foot is more deformable, possibly to allow storage and release of the elastic energy during locomotion. The coupling motion of the calcaneus and the tibia, and the larger capacity to be flattened due to axial loading observed in the human foot are possibly morphological adaptations for habitual bipedal locomotion that has evolved in the human lineage. The Royal Society 2021-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8596007/ /pubmed/34804579 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.211344 Text en © 2021 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Organismal and Evolutionary Biology
Negishi, Takuo
Ito, Kohta
Hosoda, Koh
Nagura, Takeo
Ota, Tomohiko
Imanishi, Nobuaki
Jinzaki, Masahiro
Oishi, Motoharu
Ogihara, Naomichi
Comparative radiographic analysis of three-dimensional innate mobility of the foot bones under axial loading of humans and African great apes
title Comparative radiographic analysis of three-dimensional innate mobility of the foot bones under axial loading of humans and African great apes
title_full Comparative radiographic analysis of three-dimensional innate mobility of the foot bones under axial loading of humans and African great apes
title_fullStr Comparative radiographic analysis of three-dimensional innate mobility of the foot bones under axial loading of humans and African great apes
title_full_unstemmed Comparative radiographic analysis of three-dimensional innate mobility of the foot bones under axial loading of humans and African great apes
title_short Comparative radiographic analysis of three-dimensional innate mobility of the foot bones under axial loading of humans and African great apes
title_sort comparative radiographic analysis of three-dimensional innate mobility of the foot bones under axial loading of humans and african great apes
topic Organismal and Evolutionary Biology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8596007/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34804579
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.211344
work_keys_str_mv AT negishitakuo comparativeradiographicanalysisofthreedimensionalinnatemobilityofthefootbonesunderaxialloadingofhumansandafricangreatapes
AT itokohta comparativeradiographicanalysisofthreedimensionalinnatemobilityofthefootbonesunderaxialloadingofhumansandafricangreatapes
AT hosodakoh comparativeradiographicanalysisofthreedimensionalinnatemobilityofthefootbonesunderaxialloadingofhumansandafricangreatapes
AT naguratakeo comparativeradiographicanalysisofthreedimensionalinnatemobilityofthefootbonesunderaxialloadingofhumansandafricangreatapes
AT otatomohiko comparativeradiographicanalysisofthreedimensionalinnatemobilityofthefootbonesunderaxialloadingofhumansandafricangreatapes
AT imanishinobuaki comparativeradiographicanalysisofthreedimensionalinnatemobilityofthefootbonesunderaxialloadingofhumansandafricangreatapes
AT jinzakimasahiro comparativeradiographicanalysisofthreedimensionalinnatemobilityofthefootbonesunderaxialloadingofhumansandafricangreatapes
AT oishimotoharu comparativeradiographicanalysisofthreedimensionalinnatemobilityofthefootbonesunderaxialloadingofhumansandafricangreatapes
AT ogiharanaomichi comparativeradiographicanalysisofthreedimensionalinnatemobilityofthefootbonesunderaxialloadingofhumansandafricangreatapes