Cargando…

Adverse events of fecal microbiota transplantation: a meta-analysis of high-quality studies

BACKGROUND: Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has shown excellent efficacy in treating Clostridioides difficile infection, as well as promise in several other diseases. The heightened interest is accompanied by concerns over adverse events (AE) and safety. To further understand that in FMT, we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Michailidis, Lamprinos, Currier, Alden C., Le, Michelle, Flomenhoft, Deborah R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hellenic Society of Gastroenterology 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8596209/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34815646
http://dx.doi.org/10.20524/aog.2021.0655
_version_ 1784600311537598464
author Michailidis, Lamprinos
Currier, Alden C.
Le, Michelle
Flomenhoft, Deborah R.
author_facet Michailidis, Lamprinos
Currier, Alden C.
Le, Michelle
Flomenhoft, Deborah R.
author_sort Michailidis, Lamprinos
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has shown excellent efficacy in treating Clostridioides difficile infection, as well as promise in several other diseases. The heightened interest is accompanied by concerns over adverse events (AE) and safety. To further understand that in FMT, we performed a systematic review of the literature and a meta-analysis of high-quality, prospective randomized controlled trials FMT. METHODS: Studies were selected based on predefined exclusion criteria and were assessed for quality. Only prospective, randomized, controlled studies of high quality were included in the final analysis. Data were extracted on demographics, AE, indication, delivery method and follow-up duration. RESULTS: Out of 334 articles reviewed, 9 high quality studies with 756 FMTs were selected for final analysis. The pooled rate of AE was 39.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.19-0.642) as they were reported by 112 patients who received FMT. The SAE rate was 5.3% (95%CI 3.1-8.8%). The most common AE reported was abdominal pain, followed by diarrhea. The most common SAE was Clostridium difficile infection. Upper gastrointestinal tract delivery was associated with a higher rate of total AE, but not SAE. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the selected studies, the AE rate of FMT is 39.3%, with most AE being mild and self-limiting. SAE were uncommon at 5.3%, and many were only possibly related to the FMT. Adherence to standardized reporting of AE as well as longitudinal studies and registries will help further clarify the safety of FMT in the future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8596209
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Hellenic Society of Gastroenterology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85962092021-11-22 Adverse events of fecal microbiota transplantation: a meta-analysis of high-quality studies Michailidis, Lamprinos Currier, Alden C. Le, Michelle Flomenhoft, Deborah R. Ann Gastroenterol Original Article BACKGROUND: Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has shown excellent efficacy in treating Clostridioides difficile infection, as well as promise in several other diseases. The heightened interest is accompanied by concerns over adverse events (AE) and safety. To further understand that in FMT, we performed a systematic review of the literature and a meta-analysis of high-quality, prospective randomized controlled trials FMT. METHODS: Studies were selected based on predefined exclusion criteria and were assessed for quality. Only prospective, randomized, controlled studies of high quality were included in the final analysis. Data were extracted on demographics, AE, indication, delivery method and follow-up duration. RESULTS: Out of 334 articles reviewed, 9 high quality studies with 756 FMTs were selected for final analysis. The pooled rate of AE was 39.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.19-0.642) as they were reported by 112 patients who received FMT. The SAE rate was 5.3% (95%CI 3.1-8.8%). The most common AE reported was abdominal pain, followed by diarrhea. The most common SAE was Clostridium difficile infection. Upper gastrointestinal tract delivery was associated with a higher rate of total AE, but not SAE. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the selected studies, the AE rate of FMT is 39.3%, with most AE being mild and self-limiting. SAE were uncommon at 5.3%, and many were only possibly related to the FMT. Adherence to standardized reporting of AE as well as longitudinal studies and registries will help further clarify the safety of FMT in the future. Hellenic Society of Gastroenterology 2021 2021-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8596209/ /pubmed/34815646 http://dx.doi.org/10.20524/aog.2021.0655 Text en Copyright: © Hellenic Society of Gastroenterology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Michailidis, Lamprinos
Currier, Alden C.
Le, Michelle
Flomenhoft, Deborah R.
Adverse events of fecal microbiota transplantation: a meta-analysis of high-quality studies
title Adverse events of fecal microbiota transplantation: a meta-analysis of high-quality studies
title_full Adverse events of fecal microbiota transplantation: a meta-analysis of high-quality studies
title_fullStr Adverse events of fecal microbiota transplantation: a meta-analysis of high-quality studies
title_full_unstemmed Adverse events of fecal microbiota transplantation: a meta-analysis of high-quality studies
title_short Adverse events of fecal microbiota transplantation: a meta-analysis of high-quality studies
title_sort adverse events of fecal microbiota transplantation: a meta-analysis of high-quality studies
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8596209/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34815646
http://dx.doi.org/10.20524/aog.2021.0655
work_keys_str_mv AT michailidislamprinos adverseeventsoffecalmicrobiotatransplantationametaanalysisofhighqualitystudies
AT currieraldenc adverseeventsoffecalmicrobiotatransplantationametaanalysisofhighqualitystudies
AT lemichelle adverseeventsoffecalmicrobiotatransplantationametaanalysisofhighqualitystudies
AT flomenhoftdeborahr adverseeventsoffecalmicrobiotatransplantationametaanalysisofhighqualitystudies