Cargando…

Usability-In-Place—Remote Usability Testing Methods for Homebound Older Adults: Rapid Literature Review

BACKGROUND: Technology can benefit older adults in many ways, including by facilitating remote access to services, communication, and socialization for convenience or out of necessity when individuals are homebound. As people, especially older adults, self-quarantined and sheltered in place during t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hill, Jordan R, Brown, Janetta C, Campbell, Noll L, Holden, Richard J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8596282/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34726604
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/26181
_version_ 1784600331236147200
author Hill, Jordan R
Brown, Janetta C
Campbell, Noll L
Holden, Richard J
author_facet Hill, Jordan R
Brown, Janetta C
Campbell, Noll L
Holden, Richard J
author_sort Hill, Jordan R
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Technology can benefit older adults in many ways, including by facilitating remote access to services, communication, and socialization for convenience or out of necessity when individuals are homebound. As people, especially older adults, self-quarantined and sheltered in place during the COVID-19 pandemic, the importance of usability-in-place became clear. To understand the remote use of technology in an ecologically valid manner, researchers and others must be able to test usability remotely. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to review practical approaches for and findings about remote usability testing, particularly remote usability testing with older adults. METHODS: We performed a rapid review of the literature and reported on available methods, their advantages and disadvantages, and practical recommendations. This review also reported recommendations for usability testing with older adults from the literature. RESULTS: Critically, we identified a gap in the literature—a lack of remote usability testing methods, tools, and strategies for older adults, despite this population’s increased remote technology use and needs (eg, due to disability or technology experience). We summarized existing remote usability methods that were found in the literature as well as guidelines that are available for conducting in-person usability testing with older adults. CONCLUSIONS: We call on the human factors research and practice community to address this gap to better support older adults and other homebound or mobility-restricted individuals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8596282
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85962822021-12-07 Usability-In-Place—Remote Usability Testing Methods for Homebound Older Adults: Rapid Literature Review Hill, Jordan R Brown, Janetta C Campbell, Noll L Holden, Richard J JMIR Form Res Review BACKGROUND: Technology can benefit older adults in many ways, including by facilitating remote access to services, communication, and socialization for convenience or out of necessity when individuals are homebound. As people, especially older adults, self-quarantined and sheltered in place during the COVID-19 pandemic, the importance of usability-in-place became clear. To understand the remote use of technology in an ecologically valid manner, researchers and others must be able to test usability remotely. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to review practical approaches for and findings about remote usability testing, particularly remote usability testing with older adults. METHODS: We performed a rapid review of the literature and reported on available methods, their advantages and disadvantages, and practical recommendations. This review also reported recommendations for usability testing with older adults from the literature. RESULTS: Critically, we identified a gap in the literature—a lack of remote usability testing methods, tools, and strategies for older adults, despite this population’s increased remote technology use and needs (eg, due to disability or technology experience). We summarized existing remote usability methods that were found in the literature as well as guidelines that are available for conducting in-person usability testing with older adults. CONCLUSIONS: We call on the human factors research and practice community to address this gap to better support older adults and other homebound or mobility-restricted individuals. JMIR Publications 2021-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8596282/ /pubmed/34726604 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/26181 Text en ©Jordan R Hill, Janetta C Brown, Noll L Campbell, Richard J Holden. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (https://formative.jmir.org), 02.11.2021. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Formative Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://formative.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Review
Hill, Jordan R
Brown, Janetta C
Campbell, Noll L
Holden, Richard J
Usability-In-Place—Remote Usability Testing Methods for Homebound Older Adults: Rapid Literature Review
title Usability-In-Place—Remote Usability Testing Methods for Homebound Older Adults: Rapid Literature Review
title_full Usability-In-Place—Remote Usability Testing Methods for Homebound Older Adults: Rapid Literature Review
title_fullStr Usability-In-Place—Remote Usability Testing Methods for Homebound Older Adults: Rapid Literature Review
title_full_unstemmed Usability-In-Place—Remote Usability Testing Methods for Homebound Older Adults: Rapid Literature Review
title_short Usability-In-Place—Remote Usability Testing Methods for Homebound Older Adults: Rapid Literature Review
title_sort usability-in-place—remote usability testing methods for homebound older adults: rapid literature review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8596282/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34726604
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/26181
work_keys_str_mv AT hilljordanr usabilityinplaceremoteusabilitytestingmethodsforhomeboundolderadultsrapidliteraturereview
AT brownjanettac usabilityinplaceremoteusabilitytestingmethodsforhomeboundolderadultsrapidliteraturereview
AT campbellnolll usabilityinplaceremoteusabilitytestingmethodsforhomeboundolderadultsrapidliteraturereview
AT holdenrichardj usabilityinplaceremoteusabilitytestingmethodsforhomeboundolderadultsrapidliteraturereview