Cargando…

Reference high‐resolution manometry values after magnetic sphincter augmentation

BACKGROUND: Magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) is an innovative antireflux procedure that can improve lower esophageal sphincter (LES) competency and reduce symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Some patients report postoperative dysphagia. To date, no studies have described referen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Siboni, Stefano, Ferrari, Davide, Riva, Carlo Galdino, Sozzi, Marco, Lazzari, Veronica, Milani, Valentina, Bonavina, Luigi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8596403/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33772949
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nmo.14139
_version_ 1784600364315574272
author Siboni, Stefano
Ferrari, Davide
Riva, Carlo Galdino
Sozzi, Marco
Lazzari, Veronica
Milani, Valentina
Bonavina, Luigi
author_facet Siboni, Stefano
Ferrari, Davide
Riva, Carlo Galdino
Sozzi, Marco
Lazzari, Veronica
Milani, Valentina
Bonavina, Luigi
author_sort Siboni, Stefano
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) is an innovative antireflux procedure that can improve lower esophageal sphincter (LES) competency and reduce symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Some patients report postoperative dysphagia. To date, no studies have described reference high‐resolution manometry (HRM) values after MSA implantation. METHODS: High‐resolution manometry was performed in patients free of dysphagia after MSA with or without concurrent crura repair. Reference values for all parameters of the Chicago Classification were defined as those between the 5th and 95th percentiles. The contribution of concurrent crura repair to LES competency and to reference values was also analyzed. KEY RESULTS: Eighty‐four patients met the study inclusion criteria. The upper limit of normality for integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) and intrabolus pressure (IBP) was 20.2 mmHg and 30.3 mmHg, respectively. Both variables were higher after MSA compared to normative Chicago Classification v3.0 values. The Distal Contractile Integral upper limit was in the range of normality. Patients undergoing crura repair had a significantly higher IRP (p = 0.0378) and lower GERDQ‐A scores (p = 0.0374) and Reflux Symptom Index (p = 0.0030) compared to those who underwent MSA device implantation alone. CONCLUSION & INFERENCES: This study provides HRM reference values for patients undergoing successful MSA implantation. Crural repair appears to be a key component of LES augmentation and is associated with improved clinical outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8596403
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85964032021-11-22 Reference high‐resolution manometry values after magnetic sphincter augmentation Siboni, Stefano Ferrari, Davide Riva, Carlo Galdino Sozzi, Marco Lazzari, Veronica Milani, Valentina Bonavina, Luigi Neurogastroenterol Motil Original Articles BACKGROUND: Magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) is an innovative antireflux procedure that can improve lower esophageal sphincter (LES) competency and reduce symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Some patients report postoperative dysphagia. To date, no studies have described reference high‐resolution manometry (HRM) values after MSA implantation. METHODS: High‐resolution manometry was performed in patients free of dysphagia after MSA with or without concurrent crura repair. Reference values for all parameters of the Chicago Classification were defined as those between the 5th and 95th percentiles. The contribution of concurrent crura repair to LES competency and to reference values was also analyzed. KEY RESULTS: Eighty‐four patients met the study inclusion criteria. The upper limit of normality for integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) and intrabolus pressure (IBP) was 20.2 mmHg and 30.3 mmHg, respectively. Both variables were higher after MSA compared to normative Chicago Classification v3.0 values. The Distal Contractile Integral upper limit was in the range of normality. Patients undergoing crura repair had a significantly higher IRP (p = 0.0378) and lower GERDQ‐A scores (p = 0.0374) and Reflux Symptom Index (p = 0.0030) compared to those who underwent MSA device implantation alone. CONCLUSION & INFERENCES: This study provides HRM reference values for patients undergoing successful MSA implantation. Crural repair appears to be a key component of LES augmentation and is associated with improved clinical outcomes. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-03-27 2021-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8596403/ /pubmed/33772949 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nmo.14139 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Neurogastroenterology & Motility published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Siboni, Stefano
Ferrari, Davide
Riva, Carlo Galdino
Sozzi, Marco
Lazzari, Veronica
Milani, Valentina
Bonavina, Luigi
Reference high‐resolution manometry values after magnetic sphincter augmentation
title Reference high‐resolution manometry values after magnetic sphincter augmentation
title_full Reference high‐resolution manometry values after magnetic sphincter augmentation
title_fullStr Reference high‐resolution manometry values after magnetic sphincter augmentation
title_full_unstemmed Reference high‐resolution manometry values after magnetic sphincter augmentation
title_short Reference high‐resolution manometry values after magnetic sphincter augmentation
title_sort reference high‐resolution manometry values after magnetic sphincter augmentation
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8596403/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33772949
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nmo.14139
work_keys_str_mv AT sibonistefano referencehighresolutionmanometryvaluesaftermagneticsphincteraugmentation
AT ferraridavide referencehighresolutionmanometryvaluesaftermagneticsphincteraugmentation
AT rivacarlogaldino referencehighresolutionmanometryvaluesaftermagneticsphincteraugmentation
AT sozzimarco referencehighresolutionmanometryvaluesaftermagneticsphincteraugmentation
AT lazzariveronica referencehighresolutionmanometryvaluesaftermagneticsphincteraugmentation
AT milanivalentina referencehighresolutionmanometryvaluesaftermagneticsphincteraugmentation
AT bonavinaluigi referencehighresolutionmanometryvaluesaftermagneticsphincteraugmentation