Cargando…

In vivo macromolecule signals in rat brain (1)H‐MR spectra at 9.4T: Parametrization, spline baseline estimation, and T(2) relaxation times

PURPOSE: Reliable detection and fitting of macromolecules (MM) are crucial for accurate quantification of brain short‐echo time (TE) (1)H‐MR spectra. An experimentally acquired single MM spectrum is commonly used. Higher spectral resolution at ultra‐high field (UHF) led to increased interest in usin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Simicic, Dunja, Rackayova, Veronika, Xin, Lijing, Tkáč, Ivan, Borbath, Tamas, Starcuk, Zenon, Starcukova, Jana, Lanz, Bernard, Cudalbu, Cristina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8596437/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34268821
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.28910
_version_ 1784600379256733696
author Simicic, Dunja
Rackayova, Veronika
Xin, Lijing
Tkáč, Ivan
Borbath, Tamas
Starcuk, Zenon
Starcukova, Jana
Lanz, Bernard
Cudalbu, Cristina
author_facet Simicic, Dunja
Rackayova, Veronika
Xin, Lijing
Tkáč, Ivan
Borbath, Tamas
Starcuk, Zenon
Starcukova, Jana
Lanz, Bernard
Cudalbu, Cristina
author_sort Simicic, Dunja
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Reliable detection and fitting of macromolecules (MM) are crucial for accurate quantification of brain short‐echo time (TE) (1)H‐MR spectra. An experimentally acquired single MM spectrum is commonly used. Higher spectral resolution at ultra‐high field (UHF) led to increased interest in using a parametrized MM spectrum together with flexible spline baselines to address unpredicted spectroscopic components. Herein, we aimed to: (1) implement an advanced methodological approach for post‐processing, fitting, and parametrization of 9.4T rat brain MM spectra; (2) assess the concomitant impact of the LCModel baseline and MM model (ie, single vs parametrized); and (3) estimate the apparent T(2) relaxation times for seven MM components. METHODS: A single inversion recovery sequence combined with advanced AMARES prior knowledge was used to eliminate the metabolite residuals, fit, and parametrize 10 MM components directly from 9.4T rat brain in vivo (1)H‐MR spectra at different TEs. Monte Carlo simulations were also used to assess the concomitant influence of parametrized MM and DKNTMN parameter in LCModel. RESULTS: A very stiff baseline (DKNTMN ≥ 1 ppm) in combination with a single MM spectrum led to deviations in metabolite concentrations. For some metabolites the parametrized MM showed deviations from the ground truth for all DKNTMN values. Adding prior knowledge on parametrized MM improved MM and metabolite quantification. The apparent T(2) ranged between 12 and 24 ms for seven MM peaks. CONCLUSION: Moderate flexibility in the spline baseline was required for reliable quantification of real/experimental spectra based on in vivo and Monte Carlo data. Prior knowledge on parametrized MM improved MM and metabolite quantification.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8596437
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85964372021-11-22 In vivo macromolecule signals in rat brain (1)H‐MR spectra at 9.4T: Parametrization, spline baseline estimation, and T(2) relaxation times Simicic, Dunja Rackayova, Veronika Xin, Lijing Tkáč, Ivan Borbath, Tamas Starcuk, Zenon Starcukova, Jana Lanz, Bernard Cudalbu, Cristina Magn Reson Med Research Articles—Spectroscopic Methodology PURPOSE: Reliable detection and fitting of macromolecules (MM) are crucial for accurate quantification of brain short‐echo time (TE) (1)H‐MR spectra. An experimentally acquired single MM spectrum is commonly used. Higher spectral resolution at ultra‐high field (UHF) led to increased interest in using a parametrized MM spectrum together with flexible spline baselines to address unpredicted spectroscopic components. Herein, we aimed to: (1) implement an advanced methodological approach for post‐processing, fitting, and parametrization of 9.4T rat brain MM spectra; (2) assess the concomitant impact of the LCModel baseline and MM model (ie, single vs parametrized); and (3) estimate the apparent T(2) relaxation times for seven MM components. METHODS: A single inversion recovery sequence combined with advanced AMARES prior knowledge was used to eliminate the metabolite residuals, fit, and parametrize 10 MM components directly from 9.4T rat brain in vivo (1)H‐MR spectra at different TEs. Monte Carlo simulations were also used to assess the concomitant influence of parametrized MM and DKNTMN parameter in LCModel. RESULTS: A very stiff baseline (DKNTMN ≥ 1 ppm) in combination with a single MM spectrum led to deviations in metabolite concentrations. For some metabolites the parametrized MM showed deviations from the ground truth for all DKNTMN values. Adding prior knowledge on parametrized MM improved MM and metabolite quantification. The apparent T(2) ranged between 12 and 24 ms for seven MM peaks. CONCLUSION: Moderate flexibility in the spline baseline was required for reliable quantification of real/experimental spectra based on in vivo and Monte Carlo data. Prior knowledge on parametrized MM improved MM and metabolite quantification. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-07-15 2021-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8596437/ /pubmed/34268821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.28910 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Research Articles—Spectroscopic Methodology
Simicic, Dunja
Rackayova, Veronika
Xin, Lijing
Tkáč, Ivan
Borbath, Tamas
Starcuk, Zenon
Starcukova, Jana
Lanz, Bernard
Cudalbu, Cristina
In vivo macromolecule signals in rat brain (1)H‐MR spectra at 9.4T: Parametrization, spline baseline estimation, and T(2) relaxation times
title In vivo macromolecule signals in rat brain (1)H‐MR spectra at 9.4T: Parametrization, spline baseline estimation, and T(2) relaxation times
title_full In vivo macromolecule signals in rat brain (1)H‐MR spectra at 9.4T: Parametrization, spline baseline estimation, and T(2) relaxation times
title_fullStr In vivo macromolecule signals in rat brain (1)H‐MR spectra at 9.4T: Parametrization, spline baseline estimation, and T(2) relaxation times
title_full_unstemmed In vivo macromolecule signals in rat brain (1)H‐MR spectra at 9.4T: Parametrization, spline baseline estimation, and T(2) relaxation times
title_short In vivo macromolecule signals in rat brain (1)H‐MR spectra at 9.4T: Parametrization, spline baseline estimation, and T(2) relaxation times
title_sort in vivo macromolecule signals in rat brain (1)h‐mr spectra at 9.4t: parametrization, spline baseline estimation, and t(2) relaxation times
topic Research Articles—Spectroscopic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8596437/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34268821
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.28910
work_keys_str_mv AT simicicdunja invivomacromoleculesignalsinratbrain1hmrspectraat94tparametrizationsplinebaselineestimationandt2relaxationtimes
AT rackayovaveronika invivomacromoleculesignalsinratbrain1hmrspectraat94tparametrizationsplinebaselineestimationandt2relaxationtimes
AT xinlijing invivomacromoleculesignalsinratbrain1hmrspectraat94tparametrizationsplinebaselineestimationandt2relaxationtimes
AT tkacivan invivomacromoleculesignalsinratbrain1hmrspectraat94tparametrizationsplinebaselineestimationandt2relaxationtimes
AT borbathtamas invivomacromoleculesignalsinratbrain1hmrspectraat94tparametrizationsplinebaselineestimationandt2relaxationtimes
AT starcukzenon invivomacromoleculesignalsinratbrain1hmrspectraat94tparametrizationsplinebaselineestimationandt2relaxationtimes
AT starcukovajana invivomacromoleculesignalsinratbrain1hmrspectraat94tparametrizationsplinebaselineestimationandt2relaxationtimes
AT lanzbernard invivomacromoleculesignalsinratbrain1hmrspectraat94tparametrizationsplinebaselineestimationandt2relaxationtimes
AT cudalbucristina invivomacromoleculesignalsinratbrain1hmrspectraat94tparametrizationsplinebaselineestimationandt2relaxationtimes