Cargando…
The EU Green Deal's ambition for a toxic‐free environment: Filling the gap for science‐based policymaking
Around the world, many ambitious environmental conventions and regulations have been implemented over recent decades. Despite this, the environment is still deteriorating. An increase in the volume and diversity of chemicals is one of the main drivers of this deterioration, of which biodiversity los...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8596606/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33860613 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4429 |
_version_ | 1784600420460527616 |
---|---|
author | van Dijk, Joanke Leopold, Annegaaike Flerlage, Hannah van Wezel, Annemarie Seiler, Thomas‐Benjamin Enrici, Marie‐Hélene Bloor, Michelle C. |
author_facet | van Dijk, Joanke Leopold, Annegaaike Flerlage, Hannah van Wezel, Annemarie Seiler, Thomas‐Benjamin Enrici, Marie‐Hélene Bloor, Michelle C. |
author_sort | van Dijk, Joanke |
collection | PubMed |
description | Around the world, many ambitious environmental conventions and regulations have been implemented over recent decades. Despite this, the environment is still deteriorating. An increase in the volume and diversity of chemicals is one of the main drivers of this deterioration, of which biodiversity loss is a telling indicator. In response to this situation, in October 2020, a chemicals strategy for sustainability (CSS) was published in the EU. The CSS is the first regional framework aiming to address chemical pollution in a holistic manner. The CSS covers the complete lifecycle of a chemical, including the design of better substances and remediation options, to remove chemicals from the environment. The strategy contains terms, such as a “toxic‐free environment,” for which no clear definition exists, potentially hampering the implementation of the CSS. In this paper, a definition for a “toxic‐free environment” is proposed on the basis of a survey and a discussion held at the 2020 SETAC Europe Annual Meeting. In addition, key issues that are absent from the CSS but are considered to be key for the realization of a toxic‐free environment are identified. To achieve the policy goals, it is recommended to align the definition of risk across the different chemical legislations, to establish a platform for open data and data sharing, and to increase the utility and use of novel scientific findings in policymaking, through the development of a strong science to regulation feedback mechanism and vice versa. The paper concludes that environmental scientists have the tools to address the key challenges presented in the CSS. However, an extra step is needed by both policymakers and scientists to develop methods, processes and tools, to increase the robustness and transparency of deliberation processes, and the utility of science. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2021;17:1105–1113. © 2021 The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8596606 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85966062021-11-22 The EU Green Deal's ambition for a toxic‐free environment: Filling the gap for science‐based policymaking van Dijk, Joanke Leopold, Annegaaike Flerlage, Hannah van Wezel, Annemarie Seiler, Thomas‐Benjamin Enrici, Marie‐Hélene Bloor, Michelle C. Integr Environ Assess Manag Brief Communications Around the world, many ambitious environmental conventions and regulations have been implemented over recent decades. Despite this, the environment is still deteriorating. An increase in the volume and diversity of chemicals is one of the main drivers of this deterioration, of which biodiversity loss is a telling indicator. In response to this situation, in October 2020, a chemicals strategy for sustainability (CSS) was published in the EU. The CSS is the first regional framework aiming to address chemical pollution in a holistic manner. The CSS covers the complete lifecycle of a chemical, including the design of better substances and remediation options, to remove chemicals from the environment. The strategy contains terms, such as a “toxic‐free environment,” for which no clear definition exists, potentially hampering the implementation of the CSS. In this paper, a definition for a “toxic‐free environment” is proposed on the basis of a survey and a discussion held at the 2020 SETAC Europe Annual Meeting. In addition, key issues that are absent from the CSS but are considered to be key for the realization of a toxic‐free environment are identified. To achieve the policy goals, it is recommended to align the definition of risk across the different chemical legislations, to establish a platform for open data and data sharing, and to increase the utility and use of novel scientific findings in policymaking, through the development of a strong science to regulation feedback mechanism and vice versa. The paper concludes that environmental scientists have the tools to address the key challenges presented in the CSS. However, an extra step is needed by both policymakers and scientists to develop methods, processes and tools, to increase the robustness and transparency of deliberation processes, and the utility of science. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2021;17:1105–1113. © 2021 The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC). John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-05-20 2021-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8596606/ /pubmed/33860613 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4429 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Brief Communications van Dijk, Joanke Leopold, Annegaaike Flerlage, Hannah van Wezel, Annemarie Seiler, Thomas‐Benjamin Enrici, Marie‐Hélene Bloor, Michelle C. The EU Green Deal's ambition for a toxic‐free environment: Filling the gap for science‐based policymaking |
title | The EU Green Deal's ambition for a toxic‐free environment: Filling the gap for science‐based policymaking |
title_full | The EU Green Deal's ambition for a toxic‐free environment: Filling the gap for science‐based policymaking |
title_fullStr | The EU Green Deal's ambition for a toxic‐free environment: Filling the gap for science‐based policymaking |
title_full_unstemmed | The EU Green Deal's ambition for a toxic‐free environment: Filling the gap for science‐based policymaking |
title_short | The EU Green Deal's ambition for a toxic‐free environment: Filling the gap for science‐based policymaking |
title_sort | eu green deal's ambition for a toxic‐free environment: filling the gap for science‐based policymaking |
topic | Brief Communications |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8596606/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33860613 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4429 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vandijkjoanke theeugreendealsambitionforatoxicfreeenvironmentfillingthegapforsciencebasedpolicymaking AT leopoldannegaaike theeugreendealsambitionforatoxicfreeenvironmentfillingthegapforsciencebasedpolicymaking AT flerlagehannah theeugreendealsambitionforatoxicfreeenvironmentfillingthegapforsciencebasedpolicymaking AT vanwezelannemarie theeugreendealsambitionforatoxicfreeenvironmentfillingthegapforsciencebasedpolicymaking AT seilerthomasbenjamin theeugreendealsambitionforatoxicfreeenvironmentfillingthegapforsciencebasedpolicymaking AT enricimariehelene theeugreendealsambitionforatoxicfreeenvironmentfillingthegapforsciencebasedpolicymaking AT bloormichellec theeugreendealsambitionforatoxicfreeenvironmentfillingthegapforsciencebasedpolicymaking AT vandijkjoanke eugreendealsambitionforatoxicfreeenvironmentfillingthegapforsciencebasedpolicymaking AT leopoldannegaaike eugreendealsambitionforatoxicfreeenvironmentfillingthegapforsciencebasedpolicymaking AT flerlagehannah eugreendealsambitionforatoxicfreeenvironmentfillingthegapforsciencebasedpolicymaking AT vanwezelannemarie eugreendealsambitionforatoxicfreeenvironmentfillingthegapforsciencebasedpolicymaking AT seilerthomasbenjamin eugreendealsambitionforatoxicfreeenvironmentfillingthegapforsciencebasedpolicymaking AT enricimariehelene eugreendealsambitionforatoxicfreeenvironmentfillingthegapforsciencebasedpolicymaking AT bloormichellec eugreendealsambitionforatoxicfreeenvironmentfillingthegapforsciencebasedpolicymaking |