Cargando…

The EU Green Deal's ambition for a toxic‐free environment: Filling the gap for science‐based policymaking

Around the world, many ambitious environmental conventions and regulations have been implemented over recent decades. Despite this, the environment is still deteriorating. An increase in the volume and diversity of chemicals is one of the main drivers of this deterioration, of which biodiversity los...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Dijk, Joanke, Leopold, Annegaaike, Flerlage, Hannah, van Wezel, Annemarie, Seiler, Thomas‐Benjamin, Enrici, Marie‐Hélene, Bloor, Michelle C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8596606/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33860613
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4429
_version_ 1784600420460527616
author van Dijk, Joanke
Leopold, Annegaaike
Flerlage, Hannah
van Wezel, Annemarie
Seiler, Thomas‐Benjamin
Enrici, Marie‐Hélene
Bloor, Michelle C.
author_facet van Dijk, Joanke
Leopold, Annegaaike
Flerlage, Hannah
van Wezel, Annemarie
Seiler, Thomas‐Benjamin
Enrici, Marie‐Hélene
Bloor, Michelle C.
author_sort van Dijk, Joanke
collection PubMed
description Around the world, many ambitious environmental conventions and regulations have been implemented over recent decades. Despite this, the environment is still deteriorating. An increase in the volume and diversity of chemicals is one of the main drivers of this deterioration, of which biodiversity loss is a telling indicator. In response to this situation, in October 2020, a chemicals strategy for sustainability (CSS) was published in the EU. The CSS is the first regional framework aiming to address chemical pollution in a holistic manner. The CSS covers the complete lifecycle of a chemical, including the design of better substances and remediation options, to remove chemicals from the environment. The strategy contains terms, such as a “toxic‐free environment,” for which no clear definition exists, potentially hampering the implementation of the CSS. In this paper, a definition for a “toxic‐free environment” is proposed on the basis of a survey and a discussion held at the 2020 SETAC Europe Annual Meeting. In addition, key issues that are absent from the CSS but are considered to be key for the realization of a toxic‐free environment are identified. To achieve the policy goals, it is recommended to align the definition of risk across the different chemical legislations, to establish a platform for open data and data sharing, and to increase the utility and use of novel scientific findings in policymaking, through the development of a strong science to regulation feedback mechanism and vice versa. The paper concludes that environmental scientists have the tools to address the key challenges presented in the CSS. However, an extra step is needed by both policymakers and scientists to develop methods, processes and tools, to increase the robustness and transparency of deliberation processes, and the utility of science. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2021;17:1105–1113. © 2021 The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8596606
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85966062021-11-22 The EU Green Deal's ambition for a toxic‐free environment: Filling the gap for science‐based policymaking van Dijk, Joanke Leopold, Annegaaike Flerlage, Hannah van Wezel, Annemarie Seiler, Thomas‐Benjamin Enrici, Marie‐Hélene Bloor, Michelle C. Integr Environ Assess Manag Brief Communications Around the world, many ambitious environmental conventions and regulations have been implemented over recent decades. Despite this, the environment is still deteriorating. An increase in the volume and diversity of chemicals is one of the main drivers of this deterioration, of which biodiversity loss is a telling indicator. In response to this situation, in October 2020, a chemicals strategy for sustainability (CSS) was published in the EU. The CSS is the first regional framework aiming to address chemical pollution in a holistic manner. The CSS covers the complete lifecycle of a chemical, including the design of better substances and remediation options, to remove chemicals from the environment. The strategy contains terms, such as a “toxic‐free environment,” for which no clear definition exists, potentially hampering the implementation of the CSS. In this paper, a definition for a “toxic‐free environment” is proposed on the basis of a survey and a discussion held at the 2020 SETAC Europe Annual Meeting. In addition, key issues that are absent from the CSS but are considered to be key for the realization of a toxic‐free environment are identified. To achieve the policy goals, it is recommended to align the definition of risk across the different chemical legislations, to establish a platform for open data and data sharing, and to increase the utility and use of novel scientific findings in policymaking, through the development of a strong science to regulation feedback mechanism and vice versa. The paper concludes that environmental scientists have the tools to address the key challenges presented in the CSS. However, an extra step is needed by both policymakers and scientists to develop methods, processes and tools, to increase the robustness and transparency of deliberation processes, and the utility of science. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2021;17:1105–1113. © 2021 The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC). John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-05-20 2021-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8596606/ /pubmed/33860613 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4429 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Brief Communications
van Dijk, Joanke
Leopold, Annegaaike
Flerlage, Hannah
van Wezel, Annemarie
Seiler, Thomas‐Benjamin
Enrici, Marie‐Hélene
Bloor, Michelle C.
The EU Green Deal's ambition for a toxic‐free environment: Filling the gap for science‐based policymaking
title The EU Green Deal's ambition for a toxic‐free environment: Filling the gap for science‐based policymaking
title_full The EU Green Deal's ambition for a toxic‐free environment: Filling the gap for science‐based policymaking
title_fullStr The EU Green Deal's ambition for a toxic‐free environment: Filling the gap for science‐based policymaking
title_full_unstemmed The EU Green Deal's ambition for a toxic‐free environment: Filling the gap for science‐based policymaking
title_short The EU Green Deal's ambition for a toxic‐free environment: Filling the gap for science‐based policymaking
title_sort eu green deal's ambition for a toxic‐free environment: filling the gap for science‐based policymaking
topic Brief Communications
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8596606/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33860613
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4429
work_keys_str_mv AT vandijkjoanke theeugreendealsambitionforatoxicfreeenvironmentfillingthegapforsciencebasedpolicymaking
AT leopoldannegaaike theeugreendealsambitionforatoxicfreeenvironmentfillingthegapforsciencebasedpolicymaking
AT flerlagehannah theeugreendealsambitionforatoxicfreeenvironmentfillingthegapforsciencebasedpolicymaking
AT vanwezelannemarie theeugreendealsambitionforatoxicfreeenvironmentfillingthegapforsciencebasedpolicymaking
AT seilerthomasbenjamin theeugreendealsambitionforatoxicfreeenvironmentfillingthegapforsciencebasedpolicymaking
AT enricimariehelene theeugreendealsambitionforatoxicfreeenvironmentfillingthegapforsciencebasedpolicymaking
AT bloormichellec theeugreendealsambitionforatoxicfreeenvironmentfillingthegapforsciencebasedpolicymaking
AT vandijkjoanke eugreendealsambitionforatoxicfreeenvironmentfillingthegapforsciencebasedpolicymaking
AT leopoldannegaaike eugreendealsambitionforatoxicfreeenvironmentfillingthegapforsciencebasedpolicymaking
AT flerlagehannah eugreendealsambitionforatoxicfreeenvironmentfillingthegapforsciencebasedpolicymaking
AT vanwezelannemarie eugreendealsambitionforatoxicfreeenvironmentfillingthegapforsciencebasedpolicymaking
AT seilerthomasbenjamin eugreendealsambitionforatoxicfreeenvironmentfillingthegapforsciencebasedpolicymaking
AT enricimariehelene eugreendealsambitionforatoxicfreeenvironmentfillingthegapforsciencebasedpolicymaking
AT bloormichellec eugreendealsambitionforatoxicfreeenvironmentfillingthegapforsciencebasedpolicymaking