Cargando…

Inventory of assessment practices in people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities in three European countries

BACKGROUND: Knowledge about the quality of assessment methods used in the support of people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities (PIMD) is scarce. This study aimed to provide an overview of the assessment methods used in practice and to examine whether these instruments were studied...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wessels, Marleen D., van der Putten, Annette A. J., Paap, Muirne C. S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8596661/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34137122
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jar.12896
_version_ 1784600435271663616
author Wessels, Marleen D.
van der Putten, Annette A. J.
Paap, Muirne C. S.
author_facet Wessels, Marleen D.
van der Putten, Annette A. J.
Paap, Muirne C. S.
author_sort Wessels, Marleen D.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Knowledge about the quality of assessment methods used in the support of people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities (PIMD) is scarce. This study aimed to provide an overview of the assessment methods used in practice and to examine whether these instruments were studied for their psychometric properties for people with PIMD. METHOD: Professionals (N = 148) from three European countries completed a survey on assessment practices. We performed a literature search to find information about the psychometric properties of the instruments that were identified in the survey. RESULTS: Of the participants, 78.1% used assessments that were not developed for people with PIMD. Documentation on psychometric properties was found for 8 out of 116 instruments. CONCLUSIONS: Most of the instruments in use were not designed for people with PIMD, and information about their quality is lacking. Guidelines are needed regarding the use and development of assessment methods for people with PIMD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8596661
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85966612021-11-22 Inventory of assessment practices in people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities in three European countries Wessels, Marleen D. van der Putten, Annette A. J. Paap, Muirne C. S. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil Original Articles BACKGROUND: Knowledge about the quality of assessment methods used in the support of people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities (PIMD) is scarce. This study aimed to provide an overview of the assessment methods used in practice and to examine whether these instruments were studied for their psychometric properties for people with PIMD. METHOD: Professionals (N = 148) from three European countries completed a survey on assessment practices. We performed a literature search to find information about the psychometric properties of the instruments that were identified in the survey. RESULTS: Of the participants, 78.1% used assessments that were not developed for people with PIMD. Documentation on psychometric properties was found for 8 out of 116 instruments. CONCLUSIONS: Most of the instruments in use were not designed for people with PIMD, and information about their quality is lacking. Guidelines are needed regarding the use and development of assessment methods for people with PIMD. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-06-16 2021-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8596661/ /pubmed/34137122 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jar.12896 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Wessels, Marleen D.
van der Putten, Annette A. J.
Paap, Muirne C. S.
Inventory of assessment practices in people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities in three European countries
title Inventory of assessment practices in people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities in three European countries
title_full Inventory of assessment practices in people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities in three European countries
title_fullStr Inventory of assessment practices in people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities in three European countries
title_full_unstemmed Inventory of assessment practices in people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities in three European countries
title_short Inventory of assessment practices in people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities in three European countries
title_sort inventory of assessment practices in people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities in three european countries
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8596661/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34137122
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jar.12896
work_keys_str_mv AT wesselsmarleend inventoryofassessmentpracticesinpeoplewithprofoundintellectualandmultipledisabilitiesinthreeeuropeancountries
AT vanderputtenannetteaj inventoryofassessmentpracticesinpeoplewithprofoundintellectualandmultipledisabilitiesinthreeeuropeancountries
AT paapmuirnecs inventoryofassessmentpracticesinpeoplewithprofoundintellectualandmultipledisabilitiesinthreeeuropeancountries