Cargando…
Inventory of assessment practices in people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities in three European countries
BACKGROUND: Knowledge about the quality of assessment methods used in the support of people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities (PIMD) is scarce. This study aimed to provide an overview of the assessment methods used in practice and to examine whether these instruments were studied...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8596661/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34137122 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jar.12896 |
_version_ | 1784600435271663616 |
---|---|
author | Wessels, Marleen D. van der Putten, Annette A. J. Paap, Muirne C. S. |
author_facet | Wessels, Marleen D. van der Putten, Annette A. J. Paap, Muirne C. S. |
author_sort | Wessels, Marleen D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Knowledge about the quality of assessment methods used in the support of people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities (PIMD) is scarce. This study aimed to provide an overview of the assessment methods used in practice and to examine whether these instruments were studied for their psychometric properties for people with PIMD. METHOD: Professionals (N = 148) from three European countries completed a survey on assessment practices. We performed a literature search to find information about the psychometric properties of the instruments that were identified in the survey. RESULTS: Of the participants, 78.1% used assessments that were not developed for people with PIMD. Documentation on psychometric properties was found for 8 out of 116 instruments. CONCLUSIONS: Most of the instruments in use were not designed for people with PIMD, and information about their quality is lacking. Guidelines are needed regarding the use and development of assessment methods for people with PIMD. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8596661 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85966612021-11-22 Inventory of assessment practices in people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities in three European countries Wessels, Marleen D. van der Putten, Annette A. J. Paap, Muirne C. S. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil Original Articles BACKGROUND: Knowledge about the quality of assessment methods used in the support of people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities (PIMD) is scarce. This study aimed to provide an overview of the assessment methods used in practice and to examine whether these instruments were studied for their psychometric properties for people with PIMD. METHOD: Professionals (N = 148) from three European countries completed a survey on assessment practices. We performed a literature search to find information about the psychometric properties of the instruments that were identified in the survey. RESULTS: Of the participants, 78.1% used assessments that were not developed for people with PIMD. Documentation on psychometric properties was found for 8 out of 116 instruments. CONCLUSIONS: Most of the instruments in use were not designed for people with PIMD, and information about their quality is lacking. Guidelines are needed regarding the use and development of assessment methods for people with PIMD. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-06-16 2021-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8596661/ /pubmed/34137122 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jar.12896 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Wessels, Marleen D. van der Putten, Annette A. J. Paap, Muirne C. S. Inventory of assessment practices in people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities in three European countries |
title | Inventory of assessment practices in people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities in three European countries |
title_full | Inventory of assessment practices in people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities in three European countries |
title_fullStr | Inventory of assessment practices in people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities in three European countries |
title_full_unstemmed | Inventory of assessment practices in people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities in three European countries |
title_short | Inventory of assessment practices in people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities in three European countries |
title_sort | inventory of assessment practices in people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities in three european countries |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8596661/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34137122 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jar.12896 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wesselsmarleend inventoryofassessmentpracticesinpeoplewithprofoundintellectualandmultipledisabilitiesinthreeeuropeancountries AT vanderputtenannetteaj inventoryofassessmentpracticesinpeoplewithprofoundintellectualandmultipledisabilitiesinthreeeuropeancountries AT paapmuirnecs inventoryofassessmentpracticesinpeoplewithprofoundintellectualandmultipledisabilitiesinthreeeuropeancountries |