Cargando…
Computational Evaluation of Me(2)TCCP as Lewis Acid
Supramolecular adducts between dimethyl‐2,2,3,3‐tetracyanocyclopropane (Me(2)TCCP) with 21 small (polar) molecules and 10 anions were computed with DFT (B3LYP‐D3/def2‐TZVP). Their optimized geometries were used to obtain interaction energies, and perform energy decomposition and ‘atoms‐in‐molecules’...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8596889/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34318574 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cphc.202100426 |
Sumario: | Supramolecular adducts between dimethyl‐2,2,3,3‐tetracyanocyclopropane (Me(2)TCCP) with 21 small (polar) molecules and 10 anions were computed with DFT (B3LYP‐D3/def2‐TZVP). Their optimized geometries were used to obtain interaction energies, and perform energy decomposition and ‘atoms‐in‐molecules’ analyses. A set of 38 other adducts were also evaluated for comparison purposes. Selected examples were further scrutinized by inspection of the molecular electrostatic potential maps, Noncovalent Interaction index plots, the Laplacian, the orbital interactions, and by estimating the Gibbs free energy of complexation in hexane solution. These calculations divulge the thermodynamic feasibility of Me(2)TCCP adducts and show that complexation is typically driven by dispersion with less polarized partners, but by orbital interactions when more polarized or anionic guests are deployed. Most Me(2)TCCP adducts are more stable than simple hydrogen bonding with water, but less stable than traditional Lewis adducts involving Me(3)B, or a strong halogen bond such as with Br(2). Several bonding analyses showed that the locus of interaction is found near the electron poor sp(3)‐hydridized (NC)(2)C−C(CN)(2) carbon atoms. An empty hybrid σ*/π* orbital on Me(2)TCCP was identified that can be held responsible for the stability of the most stable adducts due to donor‐acceptor interactions. |
---|