Cargando…
What Does It Mean to Be a British Isles Lupus Assessment Group–Based Composite Lupus Assessment Responder? Post Hoc Analysis of Two Phase III Trials
OBJECTIVE: The British Isles Lupus Assessment Group–based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) is a validated global measure of treatment response in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) clinical trials. To understand the relevance of BICLA in clinical practice, we investigated relationships between BIC...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8596929/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33913260 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/art.41778 |
_version_ | 1784600498931761152 |
---|---|
author | Furie, Richard Morand, Eric F. Bruce, Ian N. Isenberg, David van Vollenhoven, Ronald Abreu, Gabriel Pineda, Lilia Tummala, Raj |
author_facet | Furie, Richard Morand, Eric F. Bruce, Ian N. Isenberg, David van Vollenhoven, Ronald Abreu, Gabriel Pineda, Lilia Tummala, Raj |
author_sort | Furie, Richard |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The British Isles Lupus Assessment Group–based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) is a validated global measure of treatment response in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) clinical trials. To understand the relevance of BICLA in clinical practice, we investigated relationships between BICLA response and routine SLE assessments, patient‐reported outcomes (PROs), and medical resource utilization. METHODS: This was a post hoc analysis of pooled data from the phase III, randomized, placebo‐controlled, 52‐week TULIP‐1 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02446912; n = 457) and TULIP‐2 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02446899; n = 362) trials of intravenous anifrolumab (150/300 mg once every 4 weeks) in patients with moderate‐to‐severe SLE. Changes from baseline to week 52 in clinical assessments, PROs, and medical resource use were compared in BICLA responders versus nonresponders, regardless of treatment assignment. RESULTS: BICLA responders (n = 318) achieved significantly improved outcomes compared with nonresponders (n = 501), including lower flare rates, higher rates of attainment of sustained oral glucocorticoid taper to ≤7.5 mg/day, greater improvements in PROs (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy–Fatigue, Short Form 36 Health Survey), and fewer SLE‐related hospitalizations/emergency department visits (all nominal P < 0.001). Compared with nonresponders, BICLA responders had greater improvements in global and organ‐specific disease activity (Physician’s Global Assessment, SLE Disease Activity Index 2000, Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index Activity, and joint counts; all nominal P < 0.001). BICLA responders had fewer lupus‐related serious adverse events than nonresponders. CONCLUSION: BICLA response is associated with clinical benefit in SLE assessments, PROs, and medical resource utilization, confirming its value as a clinical trial end point that is associated with measures important to patient care. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8596929 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85969292021-11-22 What Does It Mean to Be a British Isles Lupus Assessment Group–Based Composite Lupus Assessment Responder? Post Hoc Analysis of Two Phase III Trials Furie, Richard Morand, Eric F. Bruce, Ian N. Isenberg, David van Vollenhoven, Ronald Abreu, Gabriel Pineda, Lilia Tummala, Raj Arthritis Rheumatol Systemic Lupus Erythematosus OBJECTIVE: The British Isles Lupus Assessment Group–based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) is a validated global measure of treatment response in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) clinical trials. To understand the relevance of BICLA in clinical practice, we investigated relationships between BICLA response and routine SLE assessments, patient‐reported outcomes (PROs), and medical resource utilization. METHODS: This was a post hoc analysis of pooled data from the phase III, randomized, placebo‐controlled, 52‐week TULIP‐1 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02446912; n = 457) and TULIP‐2 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02446899; n = 362) trials of intravenous anifrolumab (150/300 mg once every 4 weeks) in patients with moderate‐to‐severe SLE. Changes from baseline to week 52 in clinical assessments, PROs, and medical resource use were compared in BICLA responders versus nonresponders, regardless of treatment assignment. RESULTS: BICLA responders (n = 318) achieved significantly improved outcomes compared with nonresponders (n = 501), including lower flare rates, higher rates of attainment of sustained oral glucocorticoid taper to ≤7.5 mg/day, greater improvements in PROs (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy–Fatigue, Short Form 36 Health Survey), and fewer SLE‐related hospitalizations/emergency department visits (all nominal P < 0.001). Compared with nonresponders, BICLA responders had greater improvements in global and organ‐specific disease activity (Physician’s Global Assessment, SLE Disease Activity Index 2000, Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index Activity, and joint counts; all nominal P < 0.001). BICLA responders had fewer lupus‐related serious adverse events than nonresponders. CONCLUSION: BICLA response is associated with clinical benefit in SLE assessments, PROs, and medical resource utilization, confirming its value as a clinical trial end point that is associated with measures important to patient care. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-09-22 2021-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8596929/ /pubmed/33913260 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/art.41778 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Arthritis & Rheumatology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Rheumatology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Furie, Richard Morand, Eric F. Bruce, Ian N. Isenberg, David van Vollenhoven, Ronald Abreu, Gabriel Pineda, Lilia Tummala, Raj What Does It Mean to Be a British Isles Lupus Assessment Group–Based Composite Lupus Assessment Responder? Post Hoc Analysis of Two Phase III Trials |
title | What Does It Mean to Be a British Isles Lupus Assessment Group–Based Composite Lupus Assessment Responder? Post Hoc Analysis of Two Phase III Trials |
title_full | What Does It Mean to Be a British Isles Lupus Assessment Group–Based Composite Lupus Assessment Responder? Post Hoc Analysis of Two Phase III Trials |
title_fullStr | What Does It Mean to Be a British Isles Lupus Assessment Group–Based Composite Lupus Assessment Responder? Post Hoc Analysis of Two Phase III Trials |
title_full_unstemmed | What Does It Mean to Be a British Isles Lupus Assessment Group–Based Composite Lupus Assessment Responder? Post Hoc Analysis of Two Phase III Trials |
title_short | What Does It Mean to Be a British Isles Lupus Assessment Group–Based Composite Lupus Assessment Responder? Post Hoc Analysis of Two Phase III Trials |
title_sort | what does it mean to be a british isles lupus assessment group–based composite lupus assessment responder? post hoc analysis of two phase iii trials |
topic | Systemic Lupus Erythematosus |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8596929/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33913260 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/art.41778 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT furierichard whatdoesitmeantobeabritishisleslupusassessmentgroupbasedcompositelupusassessmentresponderposthocanalysisoftwophaseiiitrials AT morandericf whatdoesitmeantobeabritishisleslupusassessmentgroupbasedcompositelupusassessmentresponderposthocanalysisoftwophaseiiitrials AT bruceiann whatdoesitmeantobeabritishisleslupusassessmentgroupbasedcompositelupusassessmentresponderposthocanalysisoftwophaseiiitrials AT isenbergdavid whatdoesitmeantobeabritishisleslupusassessmentgroupbasedcompositelupusassessmentresponderposthocanalysisoftwophaseiiitrials AT vanvollenhovenronald whatdoesitmeantobeabritishisleslupusassessmentgroupbasedcompositelupusassessmentresponderposthocanalysisoftwophaseiiitrials AT abreugabriel whatdoesitmeantobeabritishisleslupusassessmentgroupbasedcompositelupusassessmentresponderposthocanalysisoftwophaseiiitrials AT pinedalilia whatdoesitmeantobeabritishisleslupusassessmentgroupbasedcompositelupusassessmentresponderposthocanalysisoftwophaseiiitrials AT tummalaraj whatdoesitmeantobeabritishisleslupusassessmentgroupbasedcompositelupusassessmentresponderposthocanalysisoftwophaseiiitrials |