Cargando…
Assessment tools measuring health-related empowerment in psychosocially vulnerable populations: a systematic review
BACKGROUND: Many programs are undertaken to facilitate the empowerment of vulnerable populations across the world. However, an overview of appropriate empowerment measurements to evaluate such initiatives remains incomplete to date. This systematic review aims to describe and summarise psychometric...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8596931/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34789249 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-021-01585-1 |
_version_ | 1784600499214876672 |
---|---|
author | Campbell, Sandy Zhai, Jianxia Tan, Jing-Yu Azami, Mursal Cunningham, Kym Kruske, Sue |
author_facet | Campbell, Sandy Zhai, Jianxia Tan, Jing-Yu Azami, Mursal Cunningham, Kym Kruske, Sue |
author_sort | Campbell, Sandy |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Many programs are undertaken to facilitate the empowerment of vulnerable populations across the world. However, an overview of appropriate empowerment measurements to evaluate such initiatives remains incomplete to date. This systematic review aims to describe and summarise psychometric properties, feasibility and clinical utility of the available tools for measuring empowerment in psychosocially vulnerable populations. METHODS: A systematic literature review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines was completed. A descriptive approach was used for data analysis. Papers were eligible if they explored the development, validation, cross-cultural translation or the utility of an empowerment measurement tool in the context of psychosocially vulnerable populations. RESULTS: Twenty-six included articles described twenty-six separate studies in which 16 empowerment measurement tools were developed, validated/translated, or used. There was heterogeneity in empowerment constructs, samples targeted, and psychometric properties measured. The measurement of reliability of the included instruments was satisfactory in most cases. However, the validity, responsiveness, interpretability, feasibility and clinical utility of the identified measurement tools were often not adequately described or measured. CONCLUSION: This systematic review provides a useful snapshot of the strengths as well as limitations of existing health related empowerment measurement tools used with psychosocially vulnerable populations in terms of their measurement properties, and constructs captured. It highlights significant gaps in empowerment tool measurement, development and evaluation processes. In particular, the results suggest that in addition to systematic assessments of psychometric properties, the inclusion of feasibility and clinical utility as outcome measures are important to assess relevance to clinical practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8596931 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85969312021-11-17 Assessment tools measuring health-related empowerment in psychosocially vulnerable populations: a systematic review Campbell, Sandy Zhai, Jianxia Tan, Jing-Yu Azami, Mursal Cunningham, Kym Kruske, Sue Int J Equity Health Systematic Review BACKGROUND: Many programs are undertaken to facilitate the empowerment of vulnerable populations across the world. However, an overview of appropriate empowerment measurements to evaluate such initiatives remains incomplete to date. This systematic review aims to describe and summarise psychometric properties, feasibility and clinical utility of the available tools for measuring empowerment in psychosocially vulnerable populations. METHODS: A systematic literature review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines was completed. A descriptive approach was used for data analysis. Papers were eligible if they explored the development, validation, cross-cultural translation or the utility of an empowerment measurement tool in the context of psychosocially vulnerable populations. RESULTS: Twenty-six included articles described twenty-six separate studies in which 16 empowerment measurement tools were developed, validated/translated, or used. There was heterogeneity in empowerment constructs, samples targeted, and psychometric properties measured. The measurement of reliability of the included instruments was satisfactory in most cases. However, the validity, responsiveness, interpretability, feasibility and clinical utility of the identified measurement tools were often not adequately described or measured. CONCLUSION: This systematic review provides a useful snapshot of the strengths as well as limitations of existing health related empowerment measurement tools used with psychosocially vulnerable populations in terms of their measurement properties, and constructs captured. It highlights significant gaps in empowerment tool measurement, development and evaluation processes. In particular, the results suggest that in addition to systematic assessments of psychometric properties, the inclusion of feasibility and clinical utility as outcome measures are important to assess relevance to clinical practice. BioMed Central 2021-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8596931/ /pubmed/34789249 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-021-01585-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Campbell, Sandy Zhai, Jianxia Tan, Jing-Yu Azami, Mursal Cunningham, Kym Kruske, Sue Assessment tools measuring health-related empowerment in psychosocially vulnerable populations: a systematic review |
title | Assessment tools measuring health-related empowerment in psychosocially vulnerable populations: a systematic review |
title_full | Assessment tools measuring health-related empowerment in psychosocially vulnerable populations: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Assessment tools measuring health-related empowerment in psychosocially vulnerable populations: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment tools measuring health-related empowerment in psychosocially vulnerable populations: a systematic review |
title_short | Assessment tools measuring health-related empowerment in psychosocially vulnerable populations: a systematic review |
title_sort | assessment tools measuring health-related empowerment in psychosocially vulnerable populations: a systematic review |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8596931/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34789249 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-021-01585-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT campbellsandy assessmenttoolsmeasuringhealthrelatedempowermentinpsychosociallyvulnerablepopulationsasystematicreview AT zhaijianxia assessmenttoolsmeasuringhealthrelatedempowermentinpsychosociallyvulnerablepopulationsasystematicreview AT tanjingyu assessmenttoolsmeasuringhealthrelatedempowermentinpsychosociallyvulnerablepopulationsasystematicreview AT azamimursal assessmenttoolsmeasuringhealthrelatedempowermentinpsychosociallyvulnerablepopulationsasystematicreview AT cunninghamkym assessmenttoolsmeasuringhealthrelatedempowermentinpsychosociallyvulnerablepopulationsasystematicreview AT kruskesue assessmenttoolsmeasuringhealthrelatedempowermentinpsychosociallyvulnerablepopulationsasystematicreview |