Cargando…
Bacterial lysate treatment in allergic disease: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review was to assess the efficacy of bacterial lysate treatment in patients with allergic disease. METHOD: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of bacterial lysate therapy for patients with allergic diseases (asthma, atopic dermatitis, and allergic rhinitis) were searched u...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8597000/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34097747 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pai.13572 |
_version_ | 1784600513410498560 |
---|---|
author | Li, Chengmei Zhou, Hua Zhang, Wei Che, Datian |
author_facet | Li, Chengmei Zhou, Hua Zhang, Wei Che, Datian |
author_sort | Li, Chengmei |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review was to assess the efficacy of bacterial lysate treatment in patients with allergic disease. METHOD: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of bacterial lysate therapy for patients with allergic diseases (asthma, atopic dermatitis, and allergic rhinitis) were searched using PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Biomedical literature, and Wanfang databases up to March 2020. Based on the guidelines of the Cochrane collaboration, risk of bias was assessed. RESULTS: This meta‐analysis based on 19 studies comparing bacterial lysate‐treated patients with a control group showed a 24% (RR: 1.24, 95% CI [1.19, 1.30]) increase in improvement of allergy symptom control. In addition, the improvement of asthma symptom control was 22% (RR: 1.22, 95% CI [1.14, 1.26]) higher in the bacterial lysate treatment group. Moreover, the levels of immunoglobulin (IgA and IgG), T lymphocyte subtype (CD3+, CD4+, CD4+/CD8+, Th1), and cytokines (IFN‐γ, IL‐2, and IL‐12) were increased in the treated group compared with controls. There was no significant difference in adverse event rate between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Treatment with bacterial lysate improves symptom control in patients with allergic diseases on the basis of routine therapy. No adverse risk was found in this meta‐analysis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8597000 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85970002021-11-22 Bacterial lysate treatment in allergic disease: A systematic review and meta‐analysis Li, Chengmei Zhou, Hua Zhang, Wei Che, Datian Pediatr Allergy Immunol Original Articles OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review was to assess the efficacy of bacterial lysate treatment in patients with allergic disease. METHOD: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of bacterial lysate therapy for patients with allergic diseases (asthma, atopic dermatitis, and allergic rhinitis) were searched using PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Biomedical literature, and Wanfang databases up to March 2020. Based on the guidelines of the Cochrane collaboration, risk of bias was assessed. RESULTS: This meta‐analysis based on 19 studies comparing bacterial lysate‐treated patients with a control group showed a 24% (RR: 1.24, 95% CI [1.19, 1.30]) increase in improvement of allergy symptom control. In addition, the improvement of asthma symptom control was 22% (RR: 1.22, 95% CI [1.14, 1.26]) higher in the bacterial lysate treatment group. Moreover, the levels of immunoglobulin (IgA and IgG), T lymphocyte subtype (CD3+, CD4+, CD4+/CD8+, Th1), and cytokines (IFN‐γ, IL‐2, and IL‐12) were increased in the treated group compared with controls. There was no significant difference in adverse event rate between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Treatment with bacterial lysate improves symptom control in patients with allergic diseases on the basis of routine therapy. No adverse risk was found in this meta‐analysis. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-07-05 2021-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8597000/ /pubmed/34097747 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pai.13572 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Pediatric Allergy and Immunology published by European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Li, Chengmei Zhou, Hua Zhang, Wei Che, Datian Bacterial lysate treatment in allergic disease: A systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title | Bacterial lysate treatment in allergic disease: A systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title_full | Bacterial lysate treatment in allergic disease: A systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title_fullStr | Bacterial lysate treatment in allergic disease: A systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Bacterial lysate treatment in allergic disease: A systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title_short | Bacterial lysate treatment in allergic disease: A systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title_sort | bacterial lysate treatment in allergic disease: a systematic review and meta‐analysis |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8597000/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34097747 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pai.13572 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lichengmei bacteriallysatetreatmentinallergicdiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhouhua bacteriallysatetreatmentinallergicdiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhangwei bacteriallysatetreatmentinallergicdiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT chedatian bacteriallysatetreatmentinallergicdiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |