Cargando…

Bacterial lysate treatment in allergic disease: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review was to assess the efficacy of bacterial lysate treatment in patients with allergic disease. METHOD: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of bacterial lysate therapy for patients with allergic diseases (asthma, atopic dermatitis, and allergic rhinitis) were searched u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Chengmei, Zhou, Hua, Zhang, Wei, Che, Datian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8597000/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34097747
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pai.13572
_version_ 1784600513410498560
author Li, Chengmei
Zhou, Hua
Zhang, Wei
Che, Datian
author_facet Li, Chengmei
Zhou, Hua
Zhang, Wei
Che, Datian
author_sort Li, Chengmei
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review was to assess the efficacy of bacterial lysate treatment in patients with allergic disease. METHOD: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of bacterial lysate therapy for patients with allergic diseases (asthma, atopic dermatitis, and allergic rhinitis) were searched using PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Biomedical literature, and Wanfang databases up to March 2020. Based on the guidelines of the Cochrane collaboration, risk of bias was assessed. RESULTS: This meta‐analysis based on 19 studies comparing bacterial lysate‐treated patients with a control group showed a 24% (RR: 1.24, 95% CI [1.19, 1.30]) increase in improvement of allergy symptom control. In addition, the improvement of asthma symptom control was 22% (RR: 1.22, 95% CI [1.14, 1.26]) higher in the bacterial lysate treatment group. Moreover, the levels of immunoglobulin (IgA and IgG), T lymphocyte subtype (CD3+, CD4+, CD4+/CD8+, Th1), and cytokines (IFN‐γ, IL‐2, and IL‐12) were increased in the treated group compared with controls. There was no significant difference in adverse event rate between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Treatment with bacterial lysate improves symptom control in patients with allergic diseases on the basis of routine therapy. No adverse risk was found in this meta‐analysis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8597000
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85970002021-11-22 Bacterial lysate treatment in allergic disease: A systematic review and meta‐analysis Li, Chengmei Zhou, Hua Zhang, Wei Che, Datian Pediatr Allergy Immunol Original Articles OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review was to assess the efficacy of bacterial lysate treatment in patients with allergic disease. METHOD: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of bacterial lysate therapy for patients with allergic diseases (asthma, atopic dermatitis, and allergic rhinitis) were searched using PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Biomedical literature, and Wanfang databases up to March 2020. Based on the guidelines of the Cochrane collaboration, risk of bias was assessed. RESULTS: This meta‐analysis based on 19 studies comparing bacterial lysate‐treated patients with a control group showed a 24% (RR: 1.24, 95% CI [1.19, 1.30]) increase in improvement of allergy symptom control. In addition, the improvement of asthma symptom control was 22% (RR: 1.22, 95% CI [1.14, 1.26]) higher in the bacterial lysate treatment group. Moreover, the levels of immunoglobulin (IgA and IgG), T lymphocyte subtype (CD3+, CD4+, CD4+/CD8+, Th1), and cytokines (IFN‐γ, IL‐2, and IL‐12) were increased in the treated group compared with controls. There was no significant difference in adverse event rate between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Treatment with bacterial lysate improves symptom control in patients with allergic diseases on the basis of routine therapy. No adverse risk was found in this meta‐analysis. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-07-05 2021-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8597000/ /pubmed/34097747 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pai.13572 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Pediatric Allergy and Immunology published by European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Li, Chengmei
Zhou, Hua
Zhang, Wei
Che, Datian
Bacterial lysate treatment in allergic disease: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title Bacterial lysate treatment in allergic disease: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_full Bacterial lysate treatment in allergic disease: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_fullStr Bacterial lysate treatment in allergic disease: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_full_unstemmed Bacterial lysate treatment in allergic disease: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_short Bacterial lysate treatment in allergic disease: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_sort bacterial lysate treatment in allergic disease: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8597000/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34097747
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pai.13572
work_keys_str_mv AT lichengmei bacteriallysatetreatmentinallergicdiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhouhua bacteriallysatetreatmentinallergicdiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhangwei bacteriallysatetreatmentinallergicdiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chedatian bacteriallysatetreatmentinallergicdiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis