Cargando…

Systematic review and meta‐analysis of integrated studies on antimicrobial resistance genes in Africa—A One Health perspective

BACKGROUND: Increasing antimicrobial resistance (AMR) raises serious health and financial concerns. However, the main drivers of the emergence, spread and subsequent colonisation of resistant bacterial strains between humans, animals and the environment are still poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: The ai...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Escher, Nora A., Muhummed, Abdifatah M., Hattendorf, Jan, Vonaesch, Pascale, Zinsstag, Jakob
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8597124/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34139031
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tmi.13642
_version_ 1784600544236535808
author Escher, Nora A.
Muhummed, Abdifatah M.
Hattendorf, Jan
Vonaesch, Pascale
Zinsstag, Jakob
author_facet Escher, Nora A.
Muhummed, Abdifatah M.
Hattendorf, Jan
Vonaesch, Pascale
Zinsstag, Jakob
author_sort Escher, Nora A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Increasing antimicrobial resistance (AMR) raises serious health and financial concerns. However, the main drivers of the emergence, spread and subsequent colonisation of resistant bacterial strains between humans, animals and the environment are still poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review was to identify molecular studies on AMR in One Health settings in Africa and to determine the prevalence of antimicrobial resistance genes in humans, animals and the environment. Due to the very low number of studies including environmental samples, the meta‐analysis only includes data obtained from animals and humans. METHODS: The PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus databases were searched, identifying 10 464 publications on AMR in Africa from January 1st, 2000 until June 1st, 2020. Inclusion criteria were: (i) Integrated studies assessing AMR simultaneously in an animal‐human, animal‐environment, human‐environment or animal‐human‐environment context, (ii) Genotypic characterisation of AMR and (iii) temporal and spatial relationship between samples from humans and animals. Statistical random‐effects model meta‐analysis was performed. RESULTS: Overall, 18 studies met our eligibility criteria and were included in this review. Six studies investigated Escherichia coli and Salmonella spp. (N = 6). The most prevalent AMR genes in animals included sul1 (36.2%), sul2 (32.0%), tetA (31.5%), strB (30.8%) and blaTEM (30.0%), whereas sul2 (42.4%), tetA (42.0%), strB (34.9%), blaTEM (28.8%) and sul1 (27.8%) were most prevalent in humans. We observed no clear pattern for a higher prevalence in either the animal or the human reservoir. CONCLUSION: To date, data on AMR in a One Health perspective in Africa are scarce. Prospective and longitudinal studies using an integrated One Health approach assessing the environment, animals and humans at the same time are needed to better understand the main drivers of AMR sharing in Africa.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8597124
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85971242021-11-22 Systematic review and meta‐analysis of integrated studies on antimicrobial resistance genes in Africa—A One Health perspective Escher, Nora A. Muhummed, Abdifatah M. Hattendorf, Jan Vonaesch, Pascale Zinsstag, Jakob Trop Med Int Health Reviews BACKGROUND: Increasing antimicrobial resistance (AMR) raises serious health and financial concerns. However, the main drivers of the emergence, spread and subsequent colonisation of resistant bacterial strains between humans, animals and the environment are still poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review was to identify molecular studies on AMR in One Health settings in Africa and to determine the prevalence of antimicrobial resistance genes in humans, animals and the environment. Due to the very low number of studies including environmental samples, the meta‐analysis only includes data obtained from animals and humans. METHODS: The PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus databases were searched, identifying 10 464 publications on AMR in Africa from January 1st, 2000 until June 1st, 2020. Inclusion criteria were: (i) Integrated studies assessing AMR simultaneously in an animal‐human, animal‐environment, human‐environment or animal‐human‐environment context, (ii) Genotypic characterisation of AMR and (iii) temporal and spatial relationship between samples from humans and animals. Statistical random‐effects model meta‐analysis was performed. RESULTS: Overall, 18 studies met our eligibility criteria and were included in this review. Six studies investigated Escherichia coli and Salmonella spp. (N = 6). The most prevalent AMR genes in animals included sul1 (36.2%), sul2 (32.0%), tetA (31.5%), strB (30.8%) and blaTEM (30.0%), whereas sul2 (42.4%), tetA (42.0%), strB (34.9%), blaTEM (28.8%) and sul1 (27.8%) were most prevalent in humans. We observed no clear pattern for a higher prevalence in either the animal or the human reservoir. CONCLUSION: To date, data on AMR in a One Health perspective in Africa are scarce. Prospective and longitudinal studies using an integrated One Health approach assessing the environment, animals and humans at the same time are needed to better understand the main drivers of AMR sharing in Africa. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-07-12 2021-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8597124/ /pubmed/34139031 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tmi.13642 Text en © 2021 The Authors Tropical Medicine & International Health Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Reviews
Escher, Nora A.
Muhummed, Abdifatah M.
Hattendorf, Jan
Vonaesch, Pascale
Zinsstag, Jakob
Systematic review and meta‐analysis of integrated studies on antimicrobial resistance genes in Africa—A One Health perspective
title Systematic review and meta‐analysis of integrated studies on antimicrobial resistance genes in Africa—A One Health perspective
title_full Systematic review and meta‐analysis of integrated studies on antimicrobial resistance genes in Africa—A One Health perspective
title_fullStr Systematic review and meta‐analysis of integrated studies on antimicrobial resistance genes in Africa—A One Health perspective
title_full_unstemmed Systematic review and meta‐analysis of integrated studies on antimicrobial resistance genes in Africa—A One Health perspective
title_short Systematic review and meta‐analysis of integrated studies on antimicrobial resistance genes in Africa—A One Health perspective
title_sort systematic review and meta‐analysis of integrated studies on antimicrobial resistance genes in africa—a one health perspective
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8597124/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34139031
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tmi.13642
work_keys_str_mv AT eschernoraa systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofintegratedstudiesonantimicrobialresistancegenesinafricaaonehealthperspective
AT muhummedabdifatahm systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofintegratedstudiesonantimicrobialresistancegenesinafricaaonehealthperspective
AT hattendorfjan systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofintegratedstudiesonantimicrobialresistancegenesinafricaaonehealthperspective
AT vonaeschpascale systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofintegratedstudiesonantimicrobialresistancegenesinafricaaonehealthperspective
AT zinsstagjakob systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofintegratedstudiesonantimicrobialresistancegenesinafricaaonehealthperspective