Cargando…

Intensive Care Unit Built Environments: A Comprehensive Literature Review (2005–2020)

BACKGROUND: The intensive care environment in hospitals has been the subject of significant empirical and qualitative research in the 2005–2020 period. Particular attention has been devoted to the role of infection control, family engagement, staff performance, and the built environment ramification...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Verderber, Stephen, Gray, Seth, Suresh-Kumar, Shivathmikha, Kercz, Damian, Parshuram, Christopher
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8597197/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34000842
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/19375867211009273
_version_ 1784600562309791744
author Verderber, Stephen
Gray, Seth
Suresh-Kumar, Shivathmikha
Kercz, Damian
Parshuram, Christopher
author_facet Verderber, Stephen
Gray, Seth
Suresh-Kumar, Shivathmikha
Kercz, Damian
Parshuram, Christopher
author_sort Verderber, Stephen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The intensive care environment in hospitals has been the subject of significant empirical and qualitative research in the 2005–2020 period. Particular attention has been devoted to the role of infection control, family engagement, staff performance, and the built environment ramifications of the recent COVID-19 global pandemic. A comprehensive review of this literature is reported summarizing recent advancements in this rapidly expanding body of knowledge. PURPOSE AND AIM: This comprehensive review conceptually structures the recent medical intensive care literature to provide conceptual clarity and identify current priorities and future evidence-based research and design priorities. METHOD AND RESULT: Each source reviewed was classified as one of the five types—opinion pieces/essays, cross-sectional empirical investigations, nonrandomized comparative investigations, randomized studies, and policy review essays—and into nine content categories: nature engagement and outdoor views; family accommodations; intensive care unit (ICU), neonatal ICU, and pediatric ICU spatial configuration and amenity; noise considerations; artificial and natural lighting; patient safety and infection control; portable critical care field hospitals and disaster mitigation facilities including COVID-19; ecological sustainability; and recent planning and design trends and prognostications. CONCLUSIONS: Among the findings embodied in the 135 literature sources reviewed, single-bed ICU rooms have increasingly become the norm; family engagement in the ICU experience has increased; acknowledgment of the therapeutic role of staff amenities; exposure to nature, view, and natural daylight has increased; the importance of ecological sustainability; and pandemic concerns have increased significantly in the wake of the coronavirus pandemic. Discussion of the results of this comprehensive review includes topics noticeably overlooked or underinvestigated in the 2005–2020 period and priorities for future research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8597197
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85971972021-11-18 Intensive Care Unit Built Environments: A Comprehensive Literature Review (2005–2020) Verderber, Stephen Gray, Seth Suresh-Kumar, Shivathmikha Kercz, Damian Parshuram, Christopher HERD Literature Reviews BACKGROUND: The intensive care environment in hospitals has been the subject of significant empirical and qualitative research in the 2005–2020 period. Particular attention has been devoted to the role of infection control, family engagement, staff performance, and the built environment ramifications of the recent COVID-19 global pandemic. A comprehensive review of this literature is reported summarizing recent advancements in this rapidly expanding body of knowledge. PURPOSE AND AIM: This comprehensive review conceptually structures the recent medical intensive care literature to provide conceptual clarity and identify current priorities and future evidence-based research and design priorities. METHOD AND RESULT: Each source reviewed was classified as one of the five types—opinion pieces/essays, cross-sectional empirical investigations, nonrandomized comparative investigations, randomized studies, and policy review essays—and into nine content categories: nature engagement and outdoor views; family accommodations; intensive care unit (ICU), neonatal ICU, and pediatric ICU spatial configuration and amenity; noise considerations; artificial and natural lighting; patient safety and infection control; portable critical care field hospitals and disaster mitigation facilities including COVID-19; ecological sustainability; and recent planning and design trends and prognostications. CONCLUSIONS: Among the findings embodied in the 135 literature sources reviewed, single-bed ICU rooms have increasingly become the norm; family engagement in the ICU experience has increased; acknowledgment of the therapeutic role of staff amenities; exposure to nature, view, and natural daylight has increased; the importance of ecological sustainability; and pandemic concerns have increased significantly in the wake of the coronavirus pandemic. Discussion of the results of this comprehensive review includes topics noticeably overlooked or underinvestigated in the 2005–2020 period and priorities for future research. SAGE Publications 2021-05-18 2021-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8597197/ /pubmed/34000842 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/19375867211009273 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Literature Reviews
Verderber, Stephen
Gray, Seth
Suresh-Kumar, Shivathmikha
Kercz, Damian
Parshuram, Christopher
Intensive Care Unit Built Environments: A Comprehensive Literature Review (2005–2020)
title Intensive Care Unit Built Environments: A Comprehensive Literature Review (2005–2020)
title_full Intensive Care Unit Built Environments: A Comprehensive Literature Review (2005–2020)
title_fullStr Intensive Care Unit Built Environments: A Comprehensive Literature Review (2005–2020)
title_full_unstemmed Intensive Care Unit Built Environments: A Comprehensive Literature Review (2005–2020)
title_short Intensive Care Unit Built Environments: A Comprehensive Literature Review (2005–2020)
title_sort intensive care unit built environments: a comprehensive literature review (2005–2020)
topic Literature Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8597197/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34000842
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/19375867211009273
work_keys_str_mv AT verderberstephen intensivecareunitbuiltenvironmentsacomprehensiveliteraturereview20052020
AT grayseth intensivecareunitbuiltenvironmentsacomprehensiveliteraturereview20052020
AT sureshkumarshivathmikha intensivecareunitbuiltenvironmentsacomprehensiveliteraturereview20052020
AT kerczdamian intensivecareunitbuiltenvironmentsacomprehensiveliteraturereview20052020
AT parshuramchristopher intensivecareunitbuiltenvironmentsacomprehensiveliteraturereview20052020