Cargando…

Periorbital aesthetic concerns in patients seeking corneal refractive surgery

PURPOSE: To report the frequency of periorbital aesthetic abnormalities in patients undergoing refractive surgery and to report the ability of the patient and the refractive surgeon in picking up these findings compared to the oculoplastic surgeon. METHODS: Single-center, prospective observational c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Naik, Milind N, Khader, Mohammed A, Murthy, Somasheila I
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8597454/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34571632
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_471_21
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: To report the frequency of periorbital aesthetic abnormalities in patients undergoing refractive surgery and to report the ability of the patient and the refractive surgeon in picking up these findings compared to the oculoplastic surgeon. METHODS: Single-center, prospective observational case series. All patients underwent standard pre-operative work-up for refractive surgery, answered a study questionnaire, and underwent face photographs (with and without glasses). The patient, the refractive, and the oculoplastic surgeons evaluated the photographs to categorize the concerns as none, presence of ptosis, tear trough deformity, scleral show, and others. The findings of the oculoplastic surgeon were taken as the standard of reference. RESULTS: The photographs of 121 patients were analyzed. The mean age was 25.76 ± 3.75 years and 72% were males. The main indication for surgery was to eliminate dependency on glasses in a majority (76%) followed by cosmesis in 23%. The oculoplastic surgeon noted tear trough deformity in 14 (11.5%) cases, scleral show in 51 (42.1%), ptosis in 35 (28.9%), and other findings in 45 (37.1%). When the symmetrical scleral show was excluded, the patient picked up aesthetic concerns in only 8.26%, the refractive surgeon in 14% as compared to 39% by the oculoplastic surgeon (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Periorbital aesthetic significant findings were noted in 39% of the patients undergoing corneal refractive surgery when assessed by an oculoplastic surgeon. The refractive surgeon was able to pick up less than 50% of these. We recommend a basic aesthetic initial evaluation prior to refractive surgery and photographic documentation, especially in cosmetically aware patients.