Cargando…

3D Rapid Prototyping Heart Model Validation for Teaching and Training - A Pilot Project in a Teaching Institution

INTRODUCTION: Rapid prototyping is a process by which three-dimensional (3D) computerized surface models are converted into physical models. In this study, a 3D heart bio model was created using the rapid prototyping method and the accuracy of this heart model was assessed by clinicians. METHODS: Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Krishnasamy, Sivakumar, Mokhtar, Raja Amin Raja, Singh, Ramesh, Sivallingam, Sivakumar, Aziz, Yang Faridah Abdul, Mathaneswaran, Vickneswaran
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8597603/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33438849
http://dx.doi.org/10.21470/1678-9741-2020-0433
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: Rapid prototyping is a process by which three-dimensional (3D) computerized surface models are converted into physical models. In this study, a 3D heart bio model was created using the rapid prototyping method and the accuracy of this heart model was assessed by clinicians. METHODS: The two-dimensional images of normal heart from gated computed tomography scan datasets were used to create a 3D model of the heart. The slices were then processed using the software BioModroid and printed with the 3D printer. The evaluation of the model was performed by a questionnaire answered by four cardiothoracic surgeons, 12 cardiologists, five radiologists, and nine surgical registrars. RESULTS: Eighty-six percent of the anatomy structures showed in this model scored 100% accuracy. Structures such as circumflex branch of left coronary artery, great cardiac vein, papillary muscle, and coronary sinus were each rated 77%, 70%, 70%, and 57% accurate. Among 30 clinicians, a total of 93% rated the model accuracy as good and above; 64% of the clinicians evaluated this model as an excellent teaching tool for anatomy class. As a visual aid for surgery or interventional procedures, the model was rated excellent (40%), good (50%), average (23%), and poor (3%); 70% of the clinicians scored the model as above average for training purpose. Overall, this 3D rapid prototyping cardiac model was rated as excellent (33%), good (50%), and average (17%). CONCLUSION: This 3D rapid prototyping heart model will be a valuable source of anatomical education and cardiac interventional management.