Cargando…

Single Institution Experience of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Comparison of Two Dose Regimes and a Perspective on Ideal Dose Regimens

Introduction Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an effective treatment for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who are either medically inoperable or who decline surgery. SBRT improves tumor control and overall survival (OS) in medically inoperable, early-stage, NSCLC...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nittala, Mary R, Duggar, William N, Mundra, Eswar, Packianathan, Satya, Smith, Maria L, Woods, William C, Otts, Jeremy, Bhandari, Rahul, Allbright, Robert, De Delva, Pierre E, Moremen, Jacob R, Yang, Claus Chunli, Vijayakumar, Srinivasan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8597860/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34804715
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.18862
_version_ 1784600686829240320
author Nittala, Mary R
Duggar, William N
Mundra, Eswar
Packianathan, Satya
Smith, Maria L
Woods, William C
Otts, Jeremy
Bhandari, Rahul
Allbright, Robert
De Delva, Pierre E
Moremen, Jacob R
Yang, Claus Chunli
Vijayakumar, Srinivasan
author_facet Nittala, Mary R
Duggar, William N
Mundra, Eswar
Packianathan, Satya
Smith, Maria L
Woods, William C
Otts, Jeremy
Bhandari, Rahul
Allbright, Robert
De Delva, Pierre E
Moremen, Jacob R
Yang, Claus Chunli
Vijayakumar, Srinivasan
author_sort Nittala, Mary R
collection PubMed
description Introduction Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an effective treatment for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who are either medically inoperable or who decline surgery. SBRT improves tumor control and overall survival (OS) in medically inoperable, early-stage, NSCLC patients. In this study, we investigated the effectiveness of two different SBRT doses commonly used and present our institutional experience. Purpose To determine the clinical outcomes between two treatment regiments (50 Gray [Gy] vs. 55 Gy in five fractions) among Stage I NSCLC patients treated with SBRT at a state academic medical center. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of 114 patients with Stage I (T1-2 N0 M0) NSCLC treated at a state academic medical center between October 2009 and April 2019. Survival analyses with treatment regimens of 50 Gy and 55 Gy in five fractions were conducted to detect any improvement in outcomes associated with the higher dose. The primary endpoints of this study included OS, local control (LC), and disease-free survival (DFS). Log-rank test and the Kaplan-Meier method were used to analyze the survival curves of the two treatment doses. The SPSS v.24.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) was used for statistical analyses. Results The 114 early-stage NSCLC patients (median age, 68 years; range 12 to 87 years) had a median follow-up of 25 months (range two to 86 months). The number of males (n = 72; 63.2 %) exceeded the number of females (n = 42; 36.8 %). The majority of patients in this study were Caucasians (n = 68; 59.6 %) and 46 patients were African Americans (40.4 %). Two-thirds of the patients (n = 76; 66.7 %) were treated with 50 Gy in five fractions, and 38 patients (33.3 %) with 55 Gy in five fractions. The one-, two-, and three-year OS and DFS rates were improved in the patients treated with 55 Gy [OS, 81.7 % vs. 72.8 %; 81.7 % vs. 58.9 %; 81.7 % vs. 46.7 % (p = 0.049)], [DFS, 69.7 % vs. 69.7 %; 61.9 % vs. 55.7 %; 61.9 % vs. 52.0 % (p = 0.842)], compared to those treated with 50 Gy. Adenocarcinoma was the most common histology in both groups (51.3 % and 68.4 %). Failure rates were elevated for the 50 Gy regimen [39 (34.2 %) vs. 12 (8.5 %)]. Three year control rates were (66.3 % vs. 96.6 %; p = 0.002) local control; (63.3 % vs. 94.4 %; p = 0.000) regional control; and (65.7 % vs. 97.1 %; p = 0.000) distant control, compared to those treated with 55 Gy. Conclusion Early-stage NSCLC patients treated with SBRT 55 Gy in five fractions did better in terms of local control, overall survival, and disease-free survival rates compared to the 50 Gy in five fractions group.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8597860
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85978602021-11-20 Single Institution Experience of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Comparison of Two Dose Regimes and a Perspective on Ideal Dose Regimens Nittala, Mary R Duggar, William N Mundra, Eswar Packianathan, Satya Smith, Maria L Woods, William C Otts, Jeremy Bhandari, Rahul Allbright, Robert De Delva, Pierre E Moremen, Jacob R Yang, Claus Chunli Vijayakumar, Srinivasan Cureus Radiation Oncology Introduction Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an effective treatment for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who are either medically inoperable or who decline surgery. SBRT improves tumor control and overall survival (OS) in medically inoperable, early-stage, NSCLC patients. In this study, we investigated the effectiveness of two different SBRT doses commonly used and present our institutional experience. Purpose To determine the clinical outcomes between two treatment regiments (50 Gray [Gy] vs. 55 Gy in five fractions) among Stage I NSCLC patients treated with SBRT at a state academic medical center. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of 114 patients with Stage I (T1-2 N0 M0) NSCLC treated at a state academic medical center between October 2009 and April 2019. Survival analyses with treatment regimens of 50 Gy and 55 Gy in five fractions were conducted to detect any improvement in outcomes associated with the higher dose. The primary endpoints of this study included OS, local control (LC), and disease-free survival (DFS). Log-rank test and the Kaplan-Meier method were used to analyze the survival curves of the two treatment doses. The SPSS v.24.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) was used for statistical analyses. Results The 114 early-stage NSCLC patients (median age, 68 years; range 12 to 87 years) had a median follow-up of 25 months (range two to 86 months). The number of males (n = 72; 63.2 %) exceeded the number of females (n = 42; 36.8 %). The majority of patients in this study were Caucasians (n = 68; 59.6 %) and 46 patients were African Americans (40.4 %). Two-thirds of the patients (n = 76; 66.7 %) were treated with 50 Gy in five fractions, and 38 patients (33.3 %) with 55 Gy in five fractions. The one-, two-, and three-year OS and DFS rates were improved in the patients treated with 55 Gy [OS, 81.7 % vs. 72.8 %; 81.7 % vs. 58.9 %; 81.7 % vs. 46.7 % (p = 0.049)], [DFS, 69.7 % vs. 69.7 %; 61.9 % vs. 55.7 %; 61.9 % vs. 52.0 % (p = 0.842)], compared to those treated with 50 Gy. Adenocarcinoma was the most common histology in both groups (51.3 % and 68.4 %). Failure rates were elevated for the 50 Gy regimen [39 (34.2 %) vs. 12 (8.5 %)]. Three year control rates were (66.3 % vs. 96.6 %; p = 0.002) local control; (63.3 % vs. 94.4 %; p = 0.000) regional control; and (65.7 % vs. 97.1 %; p = 0.000) distant control, compared to those treated with 55 Gy. Conclusion Early-stage NSCLC patients treated with SBRT 55 Gy in five fractions did better in terms of local control, overall survival, and disease-free survival rates compared to the 50 Gy in five fractions group. Cureus 2021-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8597860/ /pubmed/34804715 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.18862 Text en Copyright © 2021, Nittala et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology
Nittala, Mary R
Duggar, William N
Mundra, Eswar
Packianathan, Satya
Smith, Maria L
Woods, William C
Otts, Jeremy
Bhandari, Rahul
Allbright, Robert
De Delva, Pierre E
Moremen, Jacob R
Yang, Claus Chunli
Vijayakumar, Srinivasan
Single Institution Experience of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Comparison of Two Dose Regimes and a Perspective on Ideal Dose Regimens
title Single Institution Experience of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Comparison of Two Dose Regimes and a Perspective on Ideal Dose Regimens
title_full Single Institution Experience of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Comparison of Two Dose Regimes and a Perspective on Ideal Dose Regimens
title_fullStr Single Institution Experience of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Comparison of Two Dose Regimes and a Perspective on Ideal Dose Regimens
title_full_unstemmed Single Institution Experience of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Comparison of Two Dose Regimes and a Perspective on Ideal Dose Regimens
title_short Single Institution Experience of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Comparison of Two Dose Regimes and a Perspective on Ideal Dose Regimens
title_sort single institution experience of stereotactic body radiation therapy in non-small cell lung cancer: comparison of two dose regimes and a perspective on ideal dose regimens
topic Radiation Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8597860/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34804715
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.18862
work_keys_str_mv AT nittalamaryr singleinstitutionexperienceofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyinnonsmallcelllungcancercomparisonoftwodoseregimesandaperspectiveonidealdoseregimens
AT duggarwilliamn singleinstitutionexperienceofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyinnonsmallcelllungcancercomparisonoftwodoseregimesandaperspectiveonidealdoseregimens
AT mundraeswar singleinstitutionexperienceofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyinnonsmallcelllungcancercomparisonoftwodoseregimesandaperspectiveonidealdoseregimens
AT packianathansatya singleinstitutionexperienceofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyinnonsmallcelllungcancercomparisonoftwodoseregimesandaperspectiveonidealdoseregimens
AT smithmarial singleinstitutionexperienceofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyinnonsmallcelllungcancercomparisonoftwodoseregimesandaperspectiveonidealdoseregimens
AT woodswilliamc singleinstitutionexperienceofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyinnonsmallcelllungcancercomparisonoftwodoseregimesandaperspectiveonidealdoseregimens
AT ottsjeremy singleinstitutionexperienceofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyinnonsmallcelllungcancercomparisonoftwodoseregimesandaperspectiveonidealdoseregimens
AT bhandarirahul singleinstitutionexperienceofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyinnonsmallcelllungcancercomparisonoftwodoseregimesandaperspectiveonidealdoseregimens
AT allbrightrobert singleinstitutionexperienceofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyinnonsmallcelllungcancercomparisonoftwodoseregimesandaperspectiveonidealdoseregimens
AT dedelvapierree singleinstitutionexperienceofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyinnonsmallcelllungcancercomparisonoftwodoseregimesandaperspectiveonidealdoseregimens
AT moremenjacobr singleinstitutionexperienceofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyinnonsmallcelllungcancercomparisonoftwodoseregimesandaperspectiveonidealdoseregimens
AT yangclauschunli singleinstitutionexperienceofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyinnonsmallcelllungcancercomparisonoftwodoseregimesandaperspectiveonidealdoseregimens
AT vijayakumarsrinivasan singleinstitutionexperienceofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyinnonsmallcelllungcancercomparisonoftwodoseregimesandaperspectiveonidealdoseregimens