Cargando…
Single Institution Experience of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Comparison of Two Dose Regimes and a Perspective on Ideal Dose Regimens
Introduction Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an effective treatment for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who are either medically inoperable or who decline surgery. SBRT improves tumor control and overall survival (OS) in medically inoperable, early-stage, NSCLC...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8597860/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34804715 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.18862 |
_version_ | 1784600686829240320 |
---|---|
author | Nittala, Mary R Duggar, William N Mundra, Eswar Packianathan, Satya Smith, Maria L Woods, William C Otts, Jeremy Bhandari, Rahul Allbright, Robert De Delva, Pierre E Moremen, Jacob R Yang, Claus Chunli Vijayakumar, Srinivasan |
author_facet | Nittala, Mary R Duggar, William N Mundra, Eswar Packianathan, Satya Smith, Maria L Woods, William C Otts, Jeremy Bhandari, Rahul Allbright, Robert De Delva, Pierre E Moremen, Jacob R Yang, Claus Chunli Vijayakumar, Srinivasan |
author_sort | Nittala, Mary R |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an effective treatment for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who are either medically inoperable or who decline surgery. SBRT improves tumor control and overall survival (OS) in medically inoperable, early-stage, NSCLC patients. In this study, we investigated the effectiveness of two different SBRT doses commonly used and present our institutional experience. Purpose To determine the clinical outcomes between two treatment regiments (50 Gray [Gy] vs. 55 Gy in five fractions) among Stage I NSCLC patients treated with SBRT at a state academic medical center. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of 114 patients with Stage I (T1-2 N0 M0) NSCLC treated at a state academic medical center between October 2009 and April 2019. Survival analyses with treatment regimens of 50 Gy and 55 Gy in five fractions were conducted to detect any improvement in outcomes associated with the higher dose. The primary endpoints of this study included OS, local control (LC), and disease-free survival (DFS). Log-rank test and the Kaplan-Meier method were used to analyze the survival curves of the two treatment doses. The SPSS v.24.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) was used for statistical analyses. Results The 114 early-stage NSCLC patients (median age, 68 years; range 12 to 87 years) had a median follow-up of 25 months (range two to 86 months). The number of males (n = 72; 63.2 %) exceeded the number of females (n = 42; 36.8 %). The majority of patients in this study were Caucasians (n = 68; 59.6 %) and 46 patients were African Americans (40.4 %). Two-thirds of the patients (n = 76; 66.7 %) were treated with 50 Gy in five fractions, and 38 patients (33.3 %) with 55 Gy in five fractions. The one-, two-, and three-year OS and DFS rates were improved in the patients treated with 55 Gy [OS, 81.7 % vs. 72.8 %; 81.7 % vs. 58.9 %; 81.7 % vs. 46.7 % (p = 0.049)], [DFS, 69.7 % vs. 69.7 %; 61.9 % vs. 55.7 %; 61.9 % vs. 52.0 % (p = 0.842)], compared to those treated with 50 Gy. Adenocarcinoma was the most common histology in both groups (51.3 % and 68.4 %). Failure rates were elevated for the 50 Gy regimen [39 (34.2 %) vs. 12 (8.5 %)]. Three year control rates were (66.3 % vs. 96.6 %; p = 0.002) local control; (63.3 % vs. 94.4 %; p = 0.000) regional control; and (65.7 % vs. 97.1 %; p = 0.000) distant control, compared to those treated with 55 Gy. Conclusion Early-stage NSCLC patients treated with SBRT 55 Gy in five fractions did better in terms of local control, overall survival, and disease-free survival rates compared to the 50 Gy in five fractions group. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8597860 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85978602021-11-20 Single Institution Experience of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Comparison of Two Dose Regimes and a Perspective on Ideal Dose Regimens Nittala, Mary R Duggar, William N Mundra, Eswar Packianathan, Satya Smith, Maria L Woods, William C Otts, Jeremy Bhandari, Rahul Allbright, Robert De Delva, Pierre E Moremen, Jacob R Yang, Claus Chunli Vijayakumar, Srinivasan Cureus Radiation Oncology Introduction Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an effective treatment for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who are either medically inoperable or who decline surgery. SBRT improves tumor control and overall survival (OS) in medically inoperable, early-stage, NSCLC patients. In this study, we investigated the effectiveness of two different SBRT doses commonly used and present our institutional experience. Purpose To determine the clinical outcomes between two treatment regiments (50 Gray [Gy] vs. 55 Gy in five fractions) among Stage I NSCLC patients treated with SBRT at a state academic medical center. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of 114 patients with Stage I (T1-2 N0 M0) NSCLC treated at a state academic medical center between October 2009 and April 2019. Survival analyses with treatment regimens of 50 Gy and 55 Gy in five fractions were conducted to detect any improvement in outcomes associated with the higher dose. The primary endpoints of this study included OS, local control (LC), and disease-free survival (DFS). Log-rank test and the Kaplan-Meier method were used to analyze the survival curves of the two treatment doses. The SPSS v.24.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) was used for statistical analyses. Results The 114 early-stage NSCLC patients (median age, 68 years; range 12 to 87 years) had a median follow-up of 25 months (range two to 86 months). The number of males (n = 72; 63.2 %) exceeded the number of females (n = 42; 36.8 %). The majority of patients in this study were Caucasians (n = 68; 59.6 %) and 46 patients were African Americans (40.4 %). Two-thirds of the patients (n = 76; 66.7 %) were treated with 50 Gy in five fractions, and 38 patients (33.3 %) with 55 Gy in five fractions. The one-, two-, and three-year OS and DFS rates were improved in the patients treated with 55 Gy [OS, 81.7 % vs. 72.8 %; 81.7 % vs. 58.9 %; 81.7 % vs. 46.7 % (p = 0.049)], [DFS, 69.7 % vs. 69.7 %; 61.9 % vs. 55.7 %; 61.9 % vs. 52.0 % (p = 0.842)], compared to those treated with 50 Gy. Adenocarcinoma was the most common histology in both groups (51.3 % and 68.4 %). Failure rates were elevated for the 50 Gy regimen [39 (34.2 %) vs. 12 (8.5 %)]. Three year control rates were (66.3 % vs. 96.6 %; p = 0.002) local control; (63.3 % vs. 94.4 %; p = 0.000) regional control; and (65.7 % vs. 97.1 %; p = 0.000) distant control, compared to those treated with 55 Gy. Conclusion Early-stage NSCLC patients treated with SBRT 55 Gy in five fractions did better in terms of local control, overall survival, and disease-free survival rates compared to the 50 Gy in five fractions group. Cureus 2021-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8597860/ /pubmed/34804715 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.18862 Text en Copyright © 2021, Nittala et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Nittala, Mary R Duggar, William N Mundra, Eswar Packianathan, Satya Smith, Maria L Woods, William C Otts, Jeremy Bhandari, Rahul Allbright, Robert De Delva, Pierre E Moremen, Jacob R Yang, Claus Chunli Vijayakumar, Srinivasan Single Institution Experience of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Comparison of Two Dose Regimes and a Perspective on Ideal Dose Regimens |
title | Single Institution Experience of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Comparison of Two Dose Regimes and a Perspective on Ideal Dose Regimens |
title_full | Single Institution Experience of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Comparison of Two Dose Regimes and a Perspective on Ideal Dose Regimens |
title_fullStr | Single Institution Experience of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Comparison of Two Dose Regimes and a Perspective on Ideal Dose Regimens |
title_full_unstemmed | Single Institution Experience of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Comparison of Two Dose Regimes and a Perspective on Ideal Dose Regimens |
title_short | Single Institution Experience of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Comparison of Two Dose Regimes and a Perspective on Ideal Dose Regimens |
title_sort | single institution experience of stereotactic body radiation therapy in non-small cell lung cancer: comparison of two dose regimes and a perspective on ideal dose regimens |
topic | Radiation Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8597860/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34804715 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.18862 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nittalamaryr singleinstitutionexperienceofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyinnonsmallcelllungcancercomparisonoftwodoseregimesandaperspectiveonidealdoseregimens AT duggarwilliamn singleinstitutionexperienceofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyinnonsmallcelllungcancercomparisonoftwodoseregimesandaperspectiveonidealdoseregimens AT mundraeswar singleinstitutionexperienceofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyinnonsmallcelllungcancercomparisonoftwodoseregimesandaperspectiveonidealdoseregimens AT packianathansatya singleinstitutionexperienceofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyinnonsmallcelllungcancercomparisonoftwodoseregimesandaperspectiveonidealdoseregimens AT smithmarial singleinstitutionexperienceofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyinnonsmallcelllungcancercomparisonoftwodoseregimesandaperspectiveonidealdoseregimens AT woodswilliamc singleinstitutionexperienceofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyinnonsmallcelllungcancercomparisonoftwodoseregimesandaperspectiveonidealdoseregimens AT ottsjeremy singleinstitutionexperienceofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyinnonsmallcelllungcancercomparisonoftwodoseregimesandaperspectiveonidealdoseregimens AT bhandarirahul singleinstitutionexperienceofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyinnonsmallcelllungcancercomparisonoftwodoseregimesandaperspectiveonidealdoseregimens AT allbrightrobert singleinstitutionexperienceofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyinnonsmallcelllungcancercomparisonoftwodoseregimesandaperspectiveonidealdoseregimens AT dedelvapierree singleinstitutionexperienceofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyinnonsmallcelllungcancercomparisonoftwodoseregimesandaperspectiveonidealdoseregimens AT moremenjacobr singleinstitutionexperienceofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyinnonsmallcelllungcancercomparisonoftwodoseregimesandaperspectiveonidealdoseregimens AT yangclauschunli singleinstitutionexperienceofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyinnonsmallcelllungcancercomparisonoftwodoseregimesandaperspectiveonidealdoseregimens AT vijayakumarsrinivasan singleinstitutionexperienceofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyinnonsmallcelllungcancercomparisonoftwodoseregimesandaperspectiveonidealdoseregimens |