Cargando…
A randomised controlled trial of the 5:2 diet
OBJECTIVE: The 5:2 diet is a popular intermittent energy restriction method of weight management that awaits further evaluation. We compared the effects of one-off 5:2 instructions with the effects of one-off standard multicomponent weight-management advice; and also examined whether additional beha...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8598045/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34788298 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258853 |
_version_ | 1784600729152913408 |
---|---|
author | Hajek, Peter Przulj, Dunja Pesola, Francesca McRobbie, Hayden Peerbux, Sarrah Phillips-Waller, Anna Bisal, Natalie Myers Smith, Katie |
author_facet | Hajek, Peter Przulj, Dunja Pesola, Francesca McRobbie, Hayden Peerbux, Sarrah Phillips-Waller, Anna Bisal, Natalie Myers Smith, Katie |
author_sort | Hajek, Peter |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The 5:2 diet is a popular intermittent energy restriction method of weight management that awaits further evaluation. We compared the effects of one-off 5:2 instructions with the effects of one-off standard multicomponent weight-management advice; and also examined whether additional behavioural support enhances 5:2 adherence and efficacy compared to one-off instructions. METHODS: Three hundred adults with obesity were randomised to receive a Standard Brief Advice (SBA) covering diet and physical activity (N = 100); 5:2 self-help instructions (5:2SH) (N = 100); or 5:2SH plus six once-weekly group support sessions (N = 100). Participants were followed up for one year. RESULTS: Adherence to 5:2SH was initially high (74% at 6 weeks), but it declined over time (31% at 6 months and 22% at one year). 5:2SH and SBA achieved similar weight-loss at six months (-1.8kg (SD = 3.5) vs -1.7kg (SD = 4.4); b = 0.23, 95%CI:-0.79–1.27, p = 0.7) and at one year (-1.9kg (SD = 4.9) vs -1.8kg (SD = 5.7), b = 0.20, 95%CI:-1.21–1.60, p = 0.79), with 18% vs 15% participants losing ≥5% of their body weight with 5:2SH and SBA, respectively at one year (RR = 0.83, 95%CI:0.44–1.54, p = 0.55). Both interventions received positive ratings, but 5:2SH ratings were significantly higher. 5:2SH had no negative effect on fat and fiber intake and physical activity compared to SBA. Compared to 5:2SH, 5:2G generated a greater weight loss at 6 weeks (-2.3kg vs -1.5kg; b = 0.74, 95%CI:1.37–0.11, p = 0.02), but by one year, the difference was no longer significant (-2.6kg vs -1.9kg, p = 0.37; ≥5% body weight loss 28% vs 18%, p = 0.10). CONCLUSIONS: Simple 5:2 advice and multicomponent weight management advice generated similar modest results. The 5:2 diet did not undermine other health behaviours, and it received more favourable ratings. Adding initial group support enhanced 5:2 adherence and effects, but the impact diminished over time. Health professionals who provide brief weight management advice may consider including the 5:2 advice as an option. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN registry (ISRCTN79408248). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8598045 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85980452021-11-18 A randomised controlled trial of the 5:2 diet Hajek, Peter Przulj, Dunja Pesola, Francesca McRobbie, Hayden Peerbux, Sarrah Phillips-Waller, Anna Bisal, Natalie Myers Smith, Katie PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: The 5:2 diet is a popular intermittent energy restriction method of weight management that awaits further evaluation. We compared the effects of one-off 5:2 instructions with the effects of one-off standard multicomponent weight-management advice; and also examined whether additional behavioural support enhances 5:2 adherence and efficacy compared to one-off instructions. METHODS: Three hundred adults with obesity were randomised to receive a Standard Brief Advice (SBA) covering diet and physical activity (N = 100); 5:2 self-help instructions (5:2SH) (N = 100); or 5:2SH plus six once-weekly group support sessions (N = 100). Participants were followed up for one year. RESULTS: Adherence to 5:2SH was initially high (74% at 6 weeks), but it declined over time (31% at 6 months and 22% at one year). 5:2SH and SBA achieved similar weight-loss at six months (-1.8kg (SD = 3.5) vs -1.7kg (SD = 4.4); b = 0.23, 95%CI:-0.79–1.27, p = 0.7) and at one year (-1.9kg (SD = 4.9) vs -1.8kg (SD = 5.7), b = 0.20, 95%CI:-1.21–1.60, p = 0.79), with 18% vs 15% participants losing ≥5% of their body weight with 5:2SH and SBA, respectively at one year (RR = 0.83, 95%CI:0.44–1.54, p = 0.55). Both interventions received positive ratings, but 5:2SH ratings were significantly higher. 5:2SH had no negative effect on fat and fiber intake and physical activity compared to SBA. Compared to 5:2SH, 5:2G generated a greater weight loss at 6 weeks (-2.3kg vs -1.5kg; b = 0.74, 95%CI:1.37–0.11, p = 0.02), but by one year, the difference was no longer significant (-2.6kg vs -1.9kg, p = 0.37; ≥5% body weight loss 28% vs 18%, p = 0.10). CONCLUSIONS: Simple 5:2 advice and multicomponent weight management advice generated similar modest results. The 5:2 diet did not undermine other health behaviours, and it received more favourable ratings. Adding initial group support enhanced 5:2 adherence and effects, but the impact diminished over time. Health professionals who provide brief weight management advice may consider including the 5:2 advice as an option. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN registry (ISRCTN79408248). Public Library of Science 2021-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8598045/ /pubmed/34788298 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258853 Text en © 2021 Hajek et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hajek, Peter Przulj, Dunja Pesola, Francesca McRobbie, Hayden Peerbux, Sarrah Phillips-Waller, Anna Bisal, Natalie Myers Smith, Katie A randomised controlled trial of the 5:2 diet |
title | A randomised controlled trial of the 5:2 diet |
title_full | A randomised controlled trial of the 5:2 diet |
title_fullStr | A randomised controlled trial of the 5:2 diet |
title_full_unstemmed | A randomised controlled trial of the 5:2 diet |
title_short | A randomised controlled trial of the 5:2 diet |
title_sort | randomised controlled trial of the 5:2 diet |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8598045/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34788298 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258853 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hajekpeter arandomisedcontrolledtrialofthe52diet AT przuljdunja arandomisedcontrolledtrialofthe52diet AT pesolafrancesca arandomisedcontrolledtrialofthe52diet AT mcrobbiehayden arandomisedcontrolledtrialofthe52diet AT peerbuxsarrah arandomisedcontrolledtrialofthe52diet AT phillipswalleranna arandomisedcontrolledtrialofthe52diet AT bisalnatalie arandomisedcontrolledtrialofthe52diet AT myerssmithkatie arandomisedcontrolledtrialofthe52diet AT hajekpeter randomisedcontrolledtrialofthe52diet AT przuljdunja randomisedcontrolledtrialofthe52diet AT pesolafrancesca randomisedcontrolledtrialofthe52diet AT mcrobbiehayden randomisedcontrolledtrialofthe52diet AT peerbuxsarrah randomisedcontrolledtrialofthe52diet AT phillipswalleranna randomisedcontrolledtrialofthe52diet AT bisalnatalie randomisedcontrolledtrialofthe52diet AT myerssmithkatie randomisedcontrolledtrialofthe52diet |