Cargando…

A randomised controlled trial of the 5:2 diet

OBJECTIVE: The 5:2 diet is a popular intermittent energy restriction method of weight management that awaits further evaluation. We compared the effects of one-off 5:2 instructions with the effects of one-off standard multicomponent weight-management advice; and also examined whether additional beha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hajek, Peter, Przulj, Dunja, Pesola, Francesca, McRobbie, Hayden, Peerbux, Sarrah, Phillips-Waller, Anna, Bisal, Natalie, Myers Smith, Katie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8598045/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34788298
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258853
_version_ 1784600729152913408
author Hajek, Peter
Przulj, Dunja
Pesola, Francesca
McRobbie, Hayden
Peerbux, Sarrah
Phillips-Waller, Anna
Bisal, Natalie
Myers Smith, Katie
author_facet Hajek, Peter
Przulj, Dunja
Pesola, Francesca
McRobbie, Hayden
Peerbux, Sarrah
Phillips-Waller, Anna
Bisal, Natalie
Myers Smith, Katie
author_sort Hajek, Peter
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The 5:2 diet is a popular intermittent energy restriction method of weight management that awaits further evaluation. We compared the effects of one-off 5:2 instructions with the effects of one-off standard multicomponent weight-management advice; and also examined whether additional behavioural support enhances 5:2 adherence and efficacy compared to one-off instructions. METHODS: Three hundred adults with obesity were randomised to receive a Standard Brief Advice (SBA) covering diet and physical activity (N = 100); 5:2 self-help instructions (5:2SH) (N = 100); or 5:2SH plus six once-weekly group support sessions (N = 100). Participants were followed up for one year. RESULTS: Adherence to 5:2SH was initially high (74% at 6 weeks), but it declined over time (31% at 6 months and 22% at one year). 5:2SH and SBA achieved similar weight-loss at six months (-1.8kg (SD = 3.5) vs -1.7kg (SD = 4.4); b = 0.23, 95%CI:-0.79–1.27, p = 0.7) and at one year (-1.9kg (SD = 4.9) vs -1.8kg (SD = 5.7), b = 0.20, 95%CI:-1.21–1.60, p = 0.79), with 18% vs 15% participants losing ≥5% of their body weight with 5:2SH and SBA, respectively at one year (RR = 0.83, 95%CI:0.44–1.54, p = 0.55). Both interventions received positive ratings, but 5:2SH ratings were significantly higher. 5:2SH had no negative effect on fat and fiber intake and physical activity compared to SBA. Compared to 5:2SH, 5:2G generated a greater weight loss at 6 weeks (-2.3kg vs -1.5kg; b = 0.74, 95%CI:1.37–0.11, p = 0.02), but by one year, the difference was no longer significant (-2.6kg vs -1.9kg, p = 0.37; ≥5% body weight loss 28% vs 18%, p = 0.10). CONCLUSIONS: Simple 5:2 advice and multicomponent weight management advice generated similar modest results. The 5:2 diet did not undermine other health behaviours, and it received more favourable ratings. Adding initial group support enhanced 5:2 adherence and effects, but the impact diminished over time. Health professionals who provide brief weight management advice may consider including the 5:2 advice as an option. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN registry (ISRCTN79408248).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8598045
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85980452021-11-18 A randomised controlled trial of the 5:2 diet Hajek, Peter Przulj, Dunja Pesola, Francesca McRobbie, Hayden Peerbux, Sarrah Phillips-Waller, Anna Bisal, Natalie Myers Smith, Katie PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: The 5:2 diet is a popular intermittent energy restriction method of weight management that awaits further evaluation. We compared the effects of one-off 5:2 instructions with the effects of one-off standard multicomponent weight-management advice; and also examined whether additional behavioural support enhances 5:2 adherence and efficacy compared to one-off instructions. METHODS: Three hundred adults with obesity were randomised to receive a Standard Brief Advice (SBA) covering diet and physical activity (N = 100); 5:2 self-help instructions (5:2SH) (N = 100); or 5:2SH plus six once-weekly group support sessions (N = 100). Participants were followed up for one year. RESULTS: Adherence to 5:2SH was initially high (74% at 6 weeks), but it declined over time (31% at 6 months and 22% at one year). 5:2SH and SBA achieved similar weight-loss at six months (-1.8kg (SD = 3.5) vs -1.7kg (SD = 4.4); b = 0.23, 95%CI:-0.79–1.27, p = 0.7) and at one year (-1.9kg (SD = 4.9) vs -1.8kg (SD = 5.7), b = 0.20, 95%CI:-1.21–1.60, p = 0.79), with 18% vs 15% participants losing ≥5% of their body weight with 5:2SH and SBA, respectively at one year (RR = 0.83, 95%CI:0.44–1.54, p = 0.55). Both interventions received positive ratings, but 5:2SH ratings were significantly higher. 5:2SH had no negative effect on fat and fiber intake and physical activity compared to SBA. Compared to 5:2SH, 5:2G generated a greater weight loss at 6 weeks (-2.3kg vs -1.5kg; b = 0.74, 95%CI:1.37–0.11, p = 0.02), but by one year, the difference was no longer significant (-2.6kg vs -1.9kg, p = 0.37; ≥5% body weight loss 28% vs 18%, p = 0.10). CONCLUSIONS: Simple 5:2 advice and multicomponent weight management advice generated similar modest results. The 5:2 diet did not undermine other health behaviours, and it received more favourable ratings. Adding initial group support enhanced 5:2 adherence and effects, but the impact diminished over time. Health professionals who provide brief weight management advice may consider including the 5:2 advice as an option. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN registry (ISRCTN79408248). Public Library of Science 2021-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8598045/ /pubmed/34788298 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258853 Text en © 2021 Hajek et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hajek, Peter
Przulj, Dunja
Pesola, Francesca
McRobbie, Hayden
Peerbux, Sarrah
Phillips-Waller, Anna
Bisal, Natalie
Myers Smith, Katie
A randomised controlled trial of the 5:2 diet
title A randomised controlled trial of the 5:2 diet
title_full A randomised controlled trial of the 5:2 diet
title_fullStr A randomised controlled trial of the 5:2 diet
title_full_unstemmed A randomised controlled trial of the 5:2 diet
title_short A randomised controlled trial of the 5:2 diet
title_sort randomised controlled trial of the 5:2 diet
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8598045/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34788298
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258853
work_keys_str_mv AT hajekpeter arandomisedcontrolledtrialofthe52diet
AT przuljdunja arandomisedcontrolledtrialofthe52diet
AT pesolafrancesca arandomisedcontrolledtrialofthe52diet
AT mcrobbiehayden arandomisedcontrolledtrialofthe52diet
AT peerbuxsarrah arandomisedcontrolledtrialofthe52diet
AT phillipswalleranna arandomisedcontrolledtrialofthe52diet
AT bisalnatalie arandomisedcontrolledtrialofthe52diet
AT myerssmithkatie arandomisedcontrolledtrialofthe52diet
AT hajekpeter randomisedcontrolledtrialofthe52diet
AT przuljdunja randomisedcontrolledtrialofthe52diet
AT pesolafrancesca randomisedcontrolledtrialofthe52diet
AT mcrobbiehayden randomisedcontrolledtrialofthe52diet
AT peerbuxsarrah randomisedcontrolledtrialofthe52diet
AT phillipswalleranna randomisedcontrolledtrialofthe52diet
AT bisalnatalie randomisedcontrolledtrialofthe52diet
AT myerssmithkatie randomisedcontrolledtrialofthe52diet