Cargando…
Evaluation of the United States COVID-19 vaccine allocation strategy
BACKGROUND: Anticipating an initial shortage of vaccines for COVID-19, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) in the United States developed priority vaccine allocations for specific demographic groups in the population. This study evaluates the performance of the CDC vaccine allocation strategy with...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8598051/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34788345 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259700 |
_version_ | 1784600730683834368 |
---|---|
author | Islam, Md Rafiul Oraby, Tamer McCombs, Audrey Chowdhury, Mohammad Mihrab Al-Mamun, Mohammad Tyshenko, Michael G. Kadelka, Claus |
author_facet | Islam, Md Rafiul Oraby, Tamer McCombs, Audrey Chowdhury, Mohammad Mihrab Al-Mamun, Mohammad Tyshenko, Michael G. Kadelka, Claus |
author_sort | Islam, Md Rafiul |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Anticipating an initial shortage of vaccines for COVID-19, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) in the United States developed priority vaccine allocations for specific demographic groups in the population. This study evaluates the performance of the CDC vaccine allocation strategy with respect to multiple potentially competing vaccination goals (minimizing mortality, cases, infections, and years of life lost (YLL)), under the same framework as the CDC allocation: four priority vaccination groups and population demographics stratified by age, comorbidities, occupation and living condition (congested or non-congested). METHODS AND FINDINGS: We developed a compartmental disease model that incorporates key elements of the current pandemic including age-varying susceptibility to infection, age-varying clinical fraction, an active case-count dependent social distancing level, and time-varying infectivity (accounting for the emergence of more infectious virus strains). The CDC allocation strategy is compared to all other possibly optimal allocations that stagger vaccine roll-out in up to four phases (17.5 million strategies). The CDC allocation strategy performed well in all vaccination goals but never optimally. Under the developed model, the CDC allocation deviated from the optimal allocations by small amounts, with 0.19% more deaths, 4.0% more cases, 4.07% more infections, and 0.97% higher YLL, than the respective optimal strategies. The CDC decision to not prioritize the vaccination of individuals under the age of 16 was optimal, as was the prioritization of health-care workers and other essential workers over non-essential workers. Finally, a higher prioritization of individuals with comorbidities in all age groups improved outcomes compared to the CDC allocation. CONCLUSION: The developed approach can be used to inform the design of future vaccine allocation strategies in the United States, or adapted for use by other countries seeking to optimize the effectiveness of their vaccine allocation strategies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8598051 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85980512021-11-18 Evaluation of the United States COVID-19 vaccine allocation strategy Islam, Md Rafiul Oraby, Tamer McCombs, Audrey Chowdhury, Mohammad Mihrab Al-Mamun, Mohammad Tyshenko, Michael G. Kadelka, Claus PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Anticipating an initial shortage of vaccines for COVID-19, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) in the United States developed priority vaccine allocations for specific demographic groups in the population. This study evaluates the performance of the CDC vaccine allocation strategy with respect to multiple potentially competing vaccination goals (minimizing mortality, cases, infections, and years of life lost (YLL)), under the same framework as the CDC allocation: four priority vaccination groups and population demographics stratified by age, comorbidities, occupation and living condition (congested or non-congested). METHODS AND FINDINGS: We developed a compartmental disease model that incorporates key elements of the current pandemic including age-varying susceptibility to infection, age-varying clinical fraction, an active case-count dependent social distancing level, and time-varying infectivity (accounting for the emergence of more infectious virus strains). The CDC allocation strategy is compared to all other possibly optimal allocations that stagger vaccine roll-out in up to four phases (17.5 million strategies). The CDC allocation strategy performed well in all vaccination goals but never optimally. Under the developed model, the CDC allocation deviated from the optimal allocations by small amounts, with 0.19% more deaths, 4.0% more cases, 4.07% more infections, and 0.97% higher YLL, than the respective optimal strategies. The CDC decision to not prioritize the vaccination of individuals under the age of 16 was optimal, as was the prioritization of health-care workers and other essential workers over non-essential workers. Finally, a higher prioritization of individuals with comorbidities in all age groups improved outcomes compared to the CDC allocation. CONCLUSION: The developed approach can be used to inform the design of future vaccine allocation strategies in the United States, or adapted for use by other countries seeking to optimize the effectiveness of their vaccine allocation strategies. Public Library of Science 2021-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8598051/ /pubmed/34788345 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259700 Text en © 2021 Islam et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Islam, Md Rafiul Oraby, Tamer McCombs, Audrey Chowdhury, Mohammad Mihrab Al-Mamun, Mohammad Tyshenko, Michael G. Kadelka, Claus Evaluation of the United States COVID-19 vaccine allocation strategy |
title | Evaluation of the United States COVID-19 vaccine allocation strategy |
title_full | Evaluation of the United States COVID-19 vaccine allocation strategy |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of the United States COVID-19 vaccine allocation strategy |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the United States COVID-19 vaccine allocation strategy |
title_short | Evaluation of the United States COVID-19 vaccine allocation strategy |
title_sort | evaluation of the united states covid-19 vaccine allocation strategy |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8598051/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34788345 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259700 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT islammdrafiul evaluationoftheunitedstatescovid19vaccineallocationstrategy AT orabytamer evaluationoftheunitedstatescovid19vaccineallocationstrategy AT mccombsaudrey evaluationoftheunitedstatescovid19vaccineallocationstrategy AT chowdhurymohammadmihrab evaluationoftheunitedstatescovid19vaccineallocationstrategy AT almamunmohammad evaluationoftheunitedstatescovid19vaccineallocationstrategy AT tyshenkomichaelg evaluationoftheunitedstatescovid19vaccineallocationstrategy AT kadelkaclaus evaluationoftheunitedstatescovid19vaccineallocationstrategy |