Cargando…

Performance optimization of a tri‐hybrid method for estimation of patient scatter into the EPID

On‐treatment EPID images are contaminated with patient‐generated scattered photons. If this component can be accurately estimated, its effect can be removed, and therefore a corresponding in vivo patient dose estimate will be more accurate. Our group previously developed a "tri‐hybrid" (TH...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guo, Kaiming, Ingleby, Harry, Van Uytven, Eric, Elbakri, Idris, Van Beek, Timothy, McCurdy, Boyd
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8598147/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34697889
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13439
_version_ 1784600752372580352
author Guo, Kaiming
Ingleby, Harry
Van Uytven, Eric
Elbakri, Idris
Van Beek, Timothy
McCurdy, Boyd
author_facet Guo, Kaiming
Ingleby, Harry
Van Uytven, Eric
Elbakri, Idris
Van Beek, Timothy
McCurdy, Boyd
author_sort Guo, Kaiming
collection PubMed
description On‐treatment EPID images are contaminated with patient‐generated scattered photons. If this component can be accurately estimated, its effect can be removed, and therefore a corresponding in vivo patient dose estimate will be more accurate. Our group previously developed a "tri‐hybrid" (TH) algorithm to provide fast but accurate estimates of patient‐generated photon scatter. The algorithm uses an analytical method to solve for singly‐scattered photon fluence, a modified Monte Carlo hybrid method to solve for multiply‐scattered photon fluence, and a pencil beam scatter kernel method to solve for electron interaction generated scattered photon fluence. However, for efficient clinical implementation, spatial and energy sampling must be optimized for speed while maintaining overall accuracy. In this work, the most significant sampling issues were examined, including spatial sampling settings for the patient voxel size, the number of Monte Carlo histories used in the modified hybrid MC method, scatter order sampling for the hybrid method, and also a range of energy spectrum sampling (i.e., energy bin sizes). The total predicted patient‐scattered photon fluence entering the EPID was compared with full MC simulation (EGSnrc) for validation. Three phantoms were tested with 6 and 18 MV beam energies, field sizes of 4 × 4, 10 × 10, and 20 × 20 cm(2), and source‐to‐imager distance of 140 cm to develop a set of optimal sampling settings. With the recommended sampling, accuracy and precision of the total‐scattered energy fluence of the TH patient scatter prediction method are within 0.9% and 1.2%, respectively, for all test cases compared with full MC simulation results. For the mean energy spectrum across the imaging plane, comparison of TH with full MC simulation showed 95% overlap. This study has optimized sampling settings so that they have minimal impact on patient scatter prediction accuracy while maintaining maximum execution speed, a critical step for future clinical implementation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8598147
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85981472021-12-02 Performance optimization of a tri‐hybrid method for estimation of patient scatter into the EPID Guo, Kaiming Ingleby, Harry Van Uytven, Eric Elbakri, Idris Van Beek, Timothy McCurdy, Boyd J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics On‐treatment EPID images are contaminated with patient‐generated scattered photons. If this component can be accurately estimated, its effect can be removed, and therefore a corresponding in vivo patient dose estimate will be more accurate. Our group previously developed a "tri‐hybrid" (TH) algorithm to provide fast but accurate estimates of patient‐generated photon scatter. The algorithm uses an analytical method to solve for singly‐scattered photon fluence, a modified Monte Carlo hybrid method to solve for multiply‐scattered photon fluence, and a pencil beam scatter kernel method to solve for electron interaction generated scattered photon fluence. However, for efficient clinical implementation, spatial and energy sampling must be optimized for speed while maintaining overall accuracy. In this work, the most significant sampling issues were examined, including spatial sampling settings for the patient voxel size, the number of Monte Carlo histories used in the modified hybrid MC method, scatter order sampling for the hybrid method, and also a range of energy spectrum sampling (i.e., energy bin sizes). The total predicted patient‐scattered photon fluence entering the EPID was compared with full MC simulation (EGSnrc) for validation. Three phantoms were tested with 6 and 18 MV beam energies, field sizes of 4 × 4, 10 × 10, and 20 × 20 cm(2), and source‐to‐imager distance of 140 cm to develop a set of optimal sampling settings. With the recommended sampling, accuracy and precision of the total‐scattered energy fluence of the TH patient scatter prediction method are within 0.9% and 1.2%, respectively, for all test cases compared with full MC simulation results. For the mean energy spectrum across the imaging plane, comparison of TH with full MC simulation showed 95% overlap. This study has optimized sampling settings so that they have minimal impact on patient scatter prediction accuracy while maintaining maximum execution speed, a critical step for future clinical implementation. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8598147/ /pubmed/34697889 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13439 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Guo, Kaiming
Ingleby, Harry
Van Uytven, Eric
Elbakri, Idris
Van Beek, Timothy
McCurdy, Boyd
Performance optimization of a tri‐hybrid method for estimation of patient scatter into the EPID
title Performance optimization of a tri‐hybrid method for estimation of patient scatter into the EPID
title_full Performance optimization of a tri‐hybrid method for estimation of patient scatter into the EPID
title_fullStr Performance optimization of a tri‐hybrid method for estimation of patient scatter into the EPID
title_full_unstemmed Performance optimization of a tri‐hybrid method for estimation of patient scatter into the EPID
title_short Performance optimization of a tri‐hybrid method for estimation of patient scatter into the EPID
title_sort performance optimization of a tri‐hybrid method for estimation of patient scatter into the epid
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8598147/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34697889
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13439
work_keys_str_mv AT guokaiming performanceoptimizationofatrihybridmethodforestimationofpatientscatterintotheepid
AT inglebyharry performanceoptimizationofatrihybridmethodforestimationofpatientscatterintotheepid
AT vanuytveneric performanceoptimizationofatrihybridmethodforestimationofpatientscatterintotheepid
AT elbakriidris performanceoptimizationofatrihybridmethodforestimationofpatientscatterintotheepid
AT vanbeektimothy performanceoptimizationofatrihybridmethodforestimationofpatientscatterintotheepid
AT mccurdyboyd performanceoptimizationofatrihybridmethodforestimationofpatientscatterintotheepid