Cargando…

Determining the longitudinal accuracy and reproducibility of T(1) and T(2) in a 3T MRI scanner

PURPOSE: To determine baseline accuracy and reproducibility of T(1) and T(2) relaxation times over 12 months on a dedicated radiotherapy MRI scanner. METHODS: An International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine/National Institute of Standards and Technology (ISMRM/NIST) System Phantom was sca...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carr, Madeline E., Keenan, Kathryn E., Rai, Robba, Metcalfe, Peter, Walker, Amy, Holloway, Lois
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8598150/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34562341
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13432
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: To determine baseline accuracy and reproducibility of T(1) and T(2) relaxation times over 12 months on a dedicated radiotherapy MRI scanner. METHODS: An International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine/National Institute of Standards and Technology (ISMRM/NIST) System Phantom was scanned monthly on a 3T MRI scanner for 1 year. T(1) was measured using inversion recovery (T(1)‐IR) and variable flip angle (T(1)‐VFA) sequences and T(2) was measured using a multi‐echo spin echo (T(2)‐SE) sequence. For each vial in the phantom, accuracy errors (%bias) were determined by the relative differences in measured T(1) and T(2) times compared to reference values. Reproducibility was measured by the coefficient of variation (CV) of T(1) and T(2) measurements across monthly scans. Accuracy and reproducibility were mainly assessed on vials with relaxation times expected to be in physiological ranges at 3T. RESULTS: A strong linear correlation between measured and reference relaxation times was found for all sequences tested (R (2 )> 0.997). Baseline bias (and CV[%]) for T(1)‐IR, T(1)‐VFA and T(2)‐SE sequences were +2.0% (2.1), +6.5% (4.2), and +8.5% (1.9), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy and reproducibility of T(1) and T(2) on the scanner were considered sufficient for the sequences tested. No longitudinal trends of variation were deduced, suggesting less frequent measurements are required following the establishment of baselines.