Cargando…
Interpretation of intrafraction motion review data and method for verification
The current clinical interface for Varian's intrafraction motion review (IMR) is limited, providing only qualitative data for review at the treatment console. This study provides a method of extracting and interpreting data from combined log files for quantitative evaluation. Combined log files...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8598153/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34582118 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13379 |
_version_ | 1784600754175082496 |
---|---|
author | Graeper, Gavin Cetnar, Ashley Ayan, Ahmet S. Weldon, Michael |
author_facet | Graeper, Gavin Cetnar, Ashley Ayan, Ahmet S. Weldon, Michael |
author_sort | Graeper, Gavin |
collection | PubMed |
description | The current clinical interface for Varian's intrafraction motion review (IMR) is limited, providing only qualitative data for review at the treatment console. This study provides a method of extracting and interpreting data from combined log files for quantitative evaluation. Combined log files acquired during patient treatment and a parsing code was developed to scan the combined log file looking for unique identifiers pertaining to the data of interest. We were able to extract clinically relevant parameters from the log files including date and time, gantry angle, expected marker position, found marker position, pixel size, and detection result. This study details how to compare IMR data to Calypso investigating dual‐surrogates for intrafraction monitoring during treatment for other researchers to build on these methods. Understanding data recorded during treatment within the combined log files can be helpful in quality improvement of patient care by retrospectively reviewing intrafraction motion. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8598153 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85981532021-12-02 Interpretation of intrafraction motion review data and method for verification Graeper, Gavin Cetnar, Ashley Ayan, Ahmet S. Weldon, Michael J Appl Clin Med Phys Technical Note The current clinical interface for Varian's intrafraction motion review (IMR) is limited, providing only qualitative data for review at the treatment console. This study provides a method of extracting and interpreting data from combined log files for quantitative evaluation. Combined log files acquired during patient treatment and a parsing code was developed to scan the combined log file looking for unique identifiers pertaining to the data of interest. We were able to extract clinically relevant parameters from the log files including date and time, gantry angle, expected marker position, found marker position, pixel size, and detection result. This study details how to compare IMR data to Calypso investigating dual‐surrogates for intrafraction monitoring during treatment for other researchers to build on these methods. Understanding data recorded during treatment within the combined log files can be helpful in quality improvement of patient care by retrospectively reviewing intrafraction motion. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8598153/ /pubmed/34582118 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13379 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Technical Note Graeper, Gavin Cetnar, Ashley Ayan, Ahmet S. Weldon, Michael Interpretation of intrafraction motion review data and method for verification |
title | Interpretation of intrafraction motion review data and method for verification |
title_full | Interpretation of intrafraction motion review data and method for verification |
title_fullStr | Interpretation of intrafraction motion review data and method for verification |
title_full_unstemmed | Interpretation of intrafraction motion review data and method for verification |
title_short | Interpretation of intrafraction motion review data and method for verification |
title_sort | interpretation of intrafraction motion review data and method for verification |
topic | Technical Note |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8598153/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34582118 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13379 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT graepergavin interpretationofintrafractionmotionreviewdataandmethodforverification AT cetnarashley interpretationofintrafractionmotionreviewdataandmethodforverification AT ayanahmets interpretationofintrafractionmotionreviewdataandmethodforverification AT weldonmichael interpretationofintrafractionmotionreviewdataandmethodforverification |