Cargando…

Silicone Oil Adhesion to Hydrophobic Acrylic Intraocular Lenses: A Comparative Laboratory Study of a New versus an Established Hydrophobic Acrylic Intraocular Lens Material

BACKGROUND: In vitro assessment of silicone oil adhesion to a new hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens (IOL) material, the Clareon model CNA0T0, compared with the established AcrySof model SN60WF was carried out. METHODS: Silicone oil adhesion was assessed for two types of IOLs, Clareon CNA0T0 (n = ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Auffarth, Gerd U., Fang, Hui, Wang, Qiang, Hengerer, Fritz, Khoramnia, Ramin, Son, Hyeck-Soo, Schickhardt, Sonja
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8598322/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34804605
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/1387987
_version_ 1784600798203740160
author Auffarth, Gerd U.
Fang, Hui
Wang, Qiang
Hengerer, Fritz
Khoramnia, Ramin
Son, Hyeck-Soo
Schickhardt, Sonja
author_facet Auffarth, Gerd U.
Fang, Hui
Wang, Qiang
Hengerer, Fritz
Khoramnia, Ramin
Son, Hyeck-Soo
Schickhardt, Sonja
author_sort Auffarth, Gerd U.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In vitro assessment of silicone oil adhesion to a new hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens (IOL) material, the Clareon model CNA0T0, compared with the established AcrySof model SN60WF was carried out. METHODS: Silicone oil adhesion was assessed for two types of IOLs, Clareon CNA0T0 (n = 10) and AcrySof SN60WF (n = 10). Lenses were immersed in an aqueous sodium chloride solution for 12 hours and then incubated at room temperature in silicone oil for 12 hours. The lenses were washed with distilled water and photographed at 25x magnification using a microscope. The percent coverage was calculated by dividing the area of oil coverage by the total surface area of the lens. RESULTS: Silicone oil adhesion to the surface of the CNA0T0 lens ranged from 4% to 22%, with a mean ± SD coverage of 8% ± 4%. Silicone oil adhesion to the surface of the SN60WF lens ranged from 1% to 17%, with a mean coverage of 9% ± 4%. The silicone oil adhesion of CNA0T0 was equivalent to that of SN60WF (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The new Clareon model CNA0T0 IOL has silicone oil adhesion and interaction that are equivalent to the established AcrySof IOL.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8598322
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85983222021-11-18 Silicone Oil Adhesion to Hydrophobic Acrylic Intraocular Lenses: A Comparative Laboratory Study of a New versus an Established Hydrophobic Acrylic Intraocular Lens Material Auffarth, Gerd U. Fang, Hui Wang, Qiang Hengerer, Fritz Khoramnia, Ramin Son, Hyeck-Soo Schickhardt, Sonja J Ophthalmol Research Article BACKGROUND: In vitro assessment of silicone oil adhesion to a new hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens (IOL) material, the Clareon model CNA0T0, compared with the established AcrySof model SN60WF was carried out. METHODS: Silicone oil adhesion was assessed for two types of IOLs, Clareon CNA0T0 (n = 10) and AcrySof SN60WF (n = 10). Lenses were immersed in an aqueous sodium chloride solution for 12 hours and then incubated at room temperature in silicone oil for 12 hours. The lenses were washed with distilled water and photographed at 25x magnification using a microscope. The percent coverage was calculated by dividing the area of oil coverage by the total surface area of the lens. RESULTS: Silicone oil adhesion to the surface of the CNA0T0 lens ranged from 4% to 22%, with a mean ± SD coverage of 8% ± 4%. Silicone oil adhesion to the surface of the SN60WF lens ranged from 1% to 17%, with a mean coverage of 9% ± 4%. The silicone oil adhesion of CNA0T0 was equivalent to that of SN60WF (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The new Clareon model CNA0T0 IOL has silicone oil adhesion and interaction that are equivalent to the established AcrySof IOL. Hindawi 2021-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8598322/ /pubmed/34804605 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/1387987 Text en Copyright © 2021 Gerd U. Auffarth et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Auffarth, Gerd U.
Fang, Hui
Wang, Qiang
Hengerer, Fritz
Khoramnia, Ramin
Son, Hyeck-Soo
Schickhardt, Sonja
Silicone Oil Adhesion to Hydrophobic Acrylic Intraocular Lenses: A Comparative Laboratory Study of a New versus an Established Hydrophobic Acrylic Intraocular Lens Material
title Silicone Oil Adhesion to Hydrophobic Acrylic Intraocular Lenses: A Comparative Laboratory Study of a New versus an Established Hydrophobic Acrylic Intraocular Lens Material
title_full Silicone Oil Adhesion to Hydrophobic Acrylic Intraocular Lenses: A Comparative Laboratory Study of a New versus an Established Hydrophobic Acrylic Intraocular Lens Material
title_fullStr Silicone Oil Adhesion to Hydrophobic Acrylic Intraocular Lenses: A Comparative Laboratory Study of a New versus an Established Hydrophobic Acrylic Intraocular Lens Material
title_full_unstemmed Silicone Oil Adhesion to Hydrophobic Acrylic Intraocular Lenses: A Comparative Laboratory Study of a New versus an Established Hydrophobic Acrylic Intraocular Lens Material
title_short Silicone Oil Adhesion to Hydrophobic Acrylic Intraocular Lenses: A Comparative Laboratory Study of a New versus an Established Hydrophobic Acrylic Intraocular Lens Material
title_sort silicone oil adhesion to hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses: a comparative laboratory study of a new versus an established hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens material
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8598322/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34804605
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/1387987
work_keys_str_mv AT auffarthgerdu siliconeoiladhesiontohydrophobicacrylicintraocularlensesacomparativelaboratorystudyofanewversusanestablishedhydrophobicacrylicintraocularlensmaterial
AT fanghui siliconeoiladhesiontohydrophobicacrylicintraocularlensesacomparativelaboratorystudyofanewversusanestablishedhydrophobicacrylicintraocularlensmaterial
AT wangqiang siliconeoiladhesiontohydrophobicacrylicintraocularlensesacomparativelaboratorystudyofanewversusanestablishedhydrophobicacrylicintraocularlensmaterial
AT hengererfritz siliconeoiladhesiontohydrophobicacrylicintraocularlensesacomparativelaboratorystudyofanewversusanestablishedhydrophobicacrylicintraocularlensmaterial
AT khoramniaramin siliconeoiladhesiontohydrophobicacrylicintraocularlensesacomparativelaboratorystudyofanewversusanestablishedhydrophobicacrylicintraocularlensmaterial
AT sonhyecksoo siliconeoiladhesiontohydrophobicacrylicintraocularlensesacomparativelaboratorystudyofanewversusanestablishedhydrophobicacrylicintraocularlensmaterial
AT schickhardtsonja siliconeoiladhesiontohydrophobicacrylicintraocularlensesacomparativelaboratorystudyofanewversusanestablishedhydrophobicacrylicintraocularlensmaterial