Cargando…

Comparison of mice’ sperm parameters exposed to some hazardous physical agents

The present study was aimed to compare the effects of exposure to noise, vibration, lighting, and microwave on male mice’ sperm parameters. The mice were randomly assigned to five groups of eight, which comprised of the unexposed group and exposure groups including the lighting (1000 lux), noise (10...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abdollahi, Mohammad-Bagher, Dehghan, Somayeh Farhang, Balochkhaneh, Faezeh Abasi, Moghadam, Manouchehr Ahmadi, Mohammadi, Hamzeh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Environmental Health and Toxicology/Korea Society for Environmental Analysis 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8598403/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34353003
http://dx.doi.org/10.5620/eaht.2021013
_version_ 1784600821518827520
author Abdollahi, Mohammad-Bagher
Dehghan, Somayeh Farhang
Balochkhaneh, Faezeh Abasi
Moghadam, Manouchehr Ahmadi
Mohammadi, Hamzeh
author_facet Abdollahi, Mohammad-Bagher
Dehghan, Somayeh Farhang
Balochkhaneh, Faezeh Abasi
Moghadam, Manouchehr Ahmadi
Mohammadi, Hamzeh
author_sort Abdollahi, Mohammad-Bagher
collection PubMed
description The present study was aimed to compare the effects of exposure to noise, vibration, lighting, and microwave on male mice’ sperm parameters. The mice were randomly assigned to five groups of eight, which comprised of the unexposed group and exposure groups including the lighting (1000 lux), noise (100 dB(A)), vibration (acceleration of 1.2 m/s(2)) and microwave (power density of 5 watts). The exposure groups were subjected to the four agents for 8 hours a day, 5 days a week during a 2-week period. Semen analysis were done according to World Health Organization guidelines. The highest significant mean difference in sperm count (−1.35×10(6)/mL) had being observed between the microwave group and the control one (P=0.001). The highest difference in immotile percent (25.88 %) had being observed between the noise group and the control one (P=0.001). The highest difference in normal morphology (−27.06 %) observed between the lighting exposure group and the control group (P=0.001). The four agents can cause changes in different sperm parameters, however for definite conclusion; more laboratory and field studies are required. In total, exposure to microwave has had the greatest effect on sperm count and exposure to light has had the greatest effect on normal morphology and non-progressive motility. Moreover, exposure to noise has had the greatest effect on progressive motility and immotile percent, respectively.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8598403
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Korean Society of Environmental Health and Toxicology/Korea Society for Environmental Analysis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85984032021-12-01 Comparison of mice’ sperm parameters exposed to some hazardous physical agents Abdollahi, Mohammad-Bagher Dehghan, Somayeh Farhang Balochkhaneh, Faezeh Abasi Moghadam, Manouchehr Ahmadi Mohammadi, Hamzeh Environ Anal Health Toxicol Original Article The present study was aimed to compare the effects of exposure to noise, vibration, lighting, and microwave on male mice’ sperm parameters. The mice were randomly assigned to five groups of eight, which comprised of the unexposed group and exposure groups including the lighting (1000 lux), noise (100 dB(A)), vibration (acceleration of 1.2 m/s(2)) and microwave (power density of 5 watts). The exposure groups were subjected to the four agents for 8 hours a day, 5 days a week during a 2-week period. Semen analysis were done according to World Health Organization guidelines. The highest significant mean difference in sperm count (−1.35×10(6)/mL) had being observed between the microwave group and the control one (P=0.001). The highest difference in immotile percent (25.88 %) had being observed between the noise group and the control one (P=0.001). The highest difference in normal morphology (−27.06 %) observed between the lighting exposure group and the control group (P=0.001). The four agents can cause changes in different sperm parameters, however for definite conclusion; more laboratory and field studies are required. In total, exposure to microwave has had the greatest effect on sperm count and exposure to light has had the greatest effect on normal morphology and non-progressive motility. Moreover, exposure to noise has had the greatest effect on progressive motility and immotile percent, respectively. Korean Society of Environmental Health and Toxicology/Korea Society for Environmental Analysis 2021-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8598403/ /pubmed/34353003 http://dx.doi.org/10.5620/eaht.2021013 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Korean Society of Environmental Health and Toxicology/Korea Society for Environmental Analysis https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Abdollahi, Mohammad-Bagher
Dehghan, Somayeh Farhang
Balochkhaneh, Faezeh Abasi
Moghadam, Manouchehr Ahmadi
Mohammadi, Hamzeh
Comparison of mice’ sperm parameters exposed to some hazardous physical agents
title Comparison of mice’ sperm parameters exposed to some hazardous physical agents
title_full Comparison of mice’ sperm parameters exposed to some hazardous physical agents
title_fullStr Comparison of mice’ sperm parameters exposed to some hazardous physical agents
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of mice’ sperm parameters exposed to some hazardous physical agents
title_short Comparison of mice’ sperm parameters exposed to some hazardous physical agents
title_sort comparison of mice’ sperm parameters exposed to some hazardous physical agents
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8598403/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34353003
http://dx.doi.org/10.5620/eaht.2021013
work_keys_str_mv AT abdollahimohammadbagher comparisonofmicespermparametersexposedtosomehazardousphysicalagents
AT dehghansomayehfarhang comparisonofmicespermparametersexposedtosomehazardousphysicalagents
AT balochkhanehfaezehabasi comparisonofmicespermparametersexposedtosomehazardousphysicalagents
AT moghadammanouchehrahmadi comparisonofmicespermparametersexposedtosomehazardousphysicalagents
AT mohammadihamzeh comparisonofmicespermparametersexposedtosomehazardousphysicalagents