Cargando…

Robotic radical prostatectomy: analysis of midterm pathologic and oncologic outcomes: A historical series from a high-volume center

BACKGROUND: Identifying predictors of positive surgical margins (PSM) and biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy (RP) may assist clinicians in formulating prognosis. Aim of the study was to report the midterm oncologic outcomes, to identify the risk factors for PSM and BCR and asse...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Asimakopoulos, Anastasios D., Annino, Filippo, Mugnier, Camille, Lopez, Laurent, Hoepffner, Jean Luc, Gaston, Richard, Piechaud, Thierry
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8599245/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33289056
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08177-0
_version_ 1784600905742548992
author Asimakopoulos, Anastasios D.
Annino, Filippo
Mugnier, Camille
Lopez, Laurent
Hoepffner, Jean Luc
Gaston, Richard
Piechaud, Thierry
author_facet Asimakopoulos, Anastasios D.
Annino, Filippo
Mugnier, Camille
Lopez, Laurent
Hoepffner, Jean Luc
Gaston, Richard
Piechaud, Thierry
author_sort Asimakopoulos, Anastasios D.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Identifying predictors of positive surgical margins (PSM) and biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy (RP) may assist clinicians in formulating prognosis. Aim of the study was to report the midterm oncologic outcomes, to identify the risk factors for PSM and BCR and assess the impact of the PSM on BCR-free survival following robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP). METHODS: From 2005 to 2010, 1679 consecutive patients underwent transperitoneal RALP. Data was retrospectively collected by an independent statistical company and analyzed in 2014. Median postoperative follow-up was 33.5 mo. BCR was defined as any detectable serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≥ 0.2 ng/mL in two consecutive measurements. BCR-free survival was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analysis were applied to identify risk factors for PSM and BCR. RESULTS: In pN0/pNx cancers, pathologic stage was pT2 in 1186 patients (71.8%), pT3 in 455 patients (27.6%), and pT4 in 11 patients (0.6%). PSM rate was 17.4% and 36.9% of pT2 and pT3 cancers, respectively. Pathologic Gleason score was < 7, = 7 and > 7 in 42.1%, 53% and 4.9% of the patients, respectively. Overall BCR-free survival was 73.1% at 5 years; the 5-year BCR-free survival was 87.9% for pT2 with negative surgical margins. PSA, Gleason score (both bioptic and pathologic), pathologic stage (pT) and surgeon's volume were significant independent predictors of PSM. PSA, pathologic Gleason score, pT and PSM were significant independent predictors of BCR-free survival. Seminal vesicle-sparing, nerve-sparing approach and the extent of nerve-sparing (intra vs interfascial dissection) did not negatively affect margin status or BCR rates. CONCLUSIONS: PSMs are a predictor of BCR. Being the only modifiable factor influencing the PSM rate, surgical experience is confirmed as a key factor for high-quality oncologic outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8599245
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85992452021-11-24 Robotic radical prostatectomy: analysis of midterm pathologic and oncologic outcomes: A historical series from a high-volume center Asimakopoulos, Anastasios D. Annino, Filippo Mugnier, Camille Lopez, Laurent Hoepffner, Jean Luc Gaston, Richard Piechaud, Thierry Surg Endosc Article BACKGROUND: Identifying predictors of positive surgical margins (PSM) and biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy (RP) may assist clinicians in formulating prognosis. Aim of the study was to report the midterm oncologic outcomes, to identify the risk factors for PSM and BCR and assess the impact of the PSM on BCR-free survival following robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP). METHODS: From 2005 to 2010, 1679 consecutive patients underwent transperitoneal RALP. Data was retrospectively collected by an independent statistical company and analyzed in 2014. Median postoperative follow-up was 33.5 mo. BCR was defined as any detectable serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≥ 0.2 ng/mL in two consecutive measurements. BCR-free survival was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analysis were applied to identify risk factors for PSM and BCR. RESULTS: In pN0/pNx cancers, pathologic stage was pT2 in 1186 patients (71.8%), pT3 in 455 patients (27.6%), and pT4 in 11 patients (0.6%). PSM rate was 17.4% and 36.9% of pT2 and pT3 cancers, respectively. Pathologic Gleason score was < 7, = 7 and > 7 in 42.1%, 53% and 4.9% of the patients, respectively. Overall BCR-free survival was 73.1% at 5 years; the 5-year BCR-free survival was 87.9% for pT2 with negative surgical margins. PSA, Gleason score (both bioptic and pathologic), pathologic stage (pT) and surgeon's volume were significant independent predictors of PSM. PSA, pathologic Gleason score, pT and PSM were significant independent predictors of BCR-free survival. Seminal vesicle-sparing, nerve-sparing approach and the extent of nerve-sparing (intra vs interfascial dissection) did not negatively affect margin status or BCR rates. CONCLUSIONS: PSMs are a predictor of BCR. Being the only modifiable factor influencing the PSM rate, surgical experience is confirmed as a key factor for high-quality oncologic outcomes. Springer US 2020-12-07 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8599245/ /pubmed/33289056 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08177-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Asimakopoulos, Anastasios D.
Annino, Filippo
Mugnier, Camille
Lopez, Laurent
Hoepffner, Jean Luc
Gaston, Richard
Piechaud, Thierry
Robotic radical prostatectomy: analysis of midterm pathologic and oncologic outcomes: A historical series from a high-volume center
title Robotic radical prostatectomy: analysis of midterm pathologic and oncologic outcomes: A historical series from a high-volume center
title_full Robotic radical prostatectomy: analysis of midterm pathologic and oncologic outcomes: A historical series from a high-volume center
title_fullStr Robotic radical prostatectomy: analysis of midterm pathologic and oncologic outcomes: A historical series from a high-volume center
title_full_unstemmed Robotic radical prostatectomy: analysis of midterm pathologic and oncologic outcomes: A historical series from a high-volume center
title_short Robotic radical prostatectomy: analysis of midterm pathologic and oncologic outcomes: A historical series from a high-volume center
title_sort robotic radical prostatectomy: analysis of midterm pathologic and oncologic outcomes: a historical series from a high-volume center
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8599245/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33289056
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08177-0
work_keys_str_mv AT asimakopoulosanastasiosd roboticradicalprostatectomyanalysisofmidtermpathologicandoncologicoutcomesahistoricalseriesfromahighvolumecenter
AT anninofilippo roboticradicalprostatectomyanalysisofmidtermpathologicandoncologicoutcomesahistoricalseriesfromahighvolumecenter
AT mugniercamille roboticradicalprostatectomyanalysisofmidtermpathologicandoncologicoutcomesahistoricalseriesfromahighvolumecenter
AT lopezlaurent roboticradicalprostatectomyanalysisofmidtermpathologicandoncologicoutcomesahistoricalseriesfromahighvolumecenter
AT hoepffnerjeanluc roboticradicalprostatectomyanalysisofmidtermpathologicandoncologicoutcomesahistoricalseriesfromahighvolumecenter
AT gastonrichard roboticradicalprostatectomyanalysisofmidtermpathologicandoncologicoutcomesahistoricalseriesfromahighvolumecenter
AT piechaudthierry roboticradicalprostatectomyanalysisofmidtermpathologicandoncologicoutcomesahistoricalseriesfromahighvolumecenter