Cargando…

EUS is accurate in characterizing pancreatic cystic lesions; a prospective comparison with cross-sectional imaging in resected cases

BACKGROUND: Imaging modalities for characterizing pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) is a known uncertainty. The aim of this prospective study was to compare the diagnostic performance of endoscopic ultrasound morphology, cytology and cyst fluid carcinoembryonic antigen (EUS-FNA-CEA) with cross-sectio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wesali, Sahar, Demir, Mehmet A., Verbeke, Caroline S., Andersson, Mats, Bratlie, Svein Olav, Sadik, Riadh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8599246/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33259018
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08166-3
_version_ 1784600906089627648
author Wesali, Sahar
Demir, Mehmet A.
Verbeke, Caroline S.
Andersson, Mats
Bratlie, Svein Olav
Sadik, Riadh
author_facet Wesali, Sahar
Demir, Mehmet A.
Verbeke, Caroline S.
Andersson, Mats
Bratlie, Svein Olav
Sadik, Riadh
author_sort Wesali, Sahar
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Imaging modalities for characterizing pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) is a known uncertainty. The aim of this prospective study was to compare the diagnostic performance of endoscopic ultrasound morphology, cytology and cyst fluid carcinoembryonic antigen (EUS-FNA-CEA) with cross-sectional imaging in resected PCLs. METHODS: The cross-sectional imaging and EUS-FNA-CEA results were collected in an academic tertiary referral centre using histology of the surgical specimen as the diagnostic standard. RESULTS: Of 289 patients undergoing evaluation for PCL with cross-sectional imaging and EUS-FNA between February 2007 and March 2017, 58 underwent surgical resection providing a final diagnosis of the PCLs: 45 mucinous, 5 serous, 1 pseudocyst, 2 endocrine, 2 solid pseudopapillary neoplasms and 3 other. EUS-FNA-CEA was more accurate than cross-sectional imaging in diagnosing mucinous PCLs (95% vs. 83%, p = 0.04). Ninety-two percent of the PCLs with high-grade dysplasia or adenocarcinoma were smaller than 3 cm in diameter. The sensitivity of EUS-FNA-CEA and cross-sectional imaging for detecting PCLs with high-grade dysplasia or adenocarcinoma were 33% and 5% (p = 0.03), respectively. However, there was no difference in accuracy between the modalities (62% vs. 66%, p = 0.79). The sensitivity for detecting pancreatic adenocarcinomas only was 64% for EUS-FNA-CEA and 9% for cross-sectional imaging (p = 0.03). Overall, EUS-FNA-CEA provided a correct diagnosis in more patients with PCLs than cross-sectional imaging (72% vs. 50%, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: EUS-FNA-CEA is accurate and should be considered a complementary test in the diagnosis of PCLs. However, the detection of PCLs with high-grade dysplasia or adenocarcinoma needs to be improved. Cyst size does not seem to be a reliable predictor of high-grade dysplasia or adenocarcinoma. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00464-020-08166-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8599246
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85992462021-11-24 EUS is accurate in characterizing pancreatic cystic lesions; a prospective comparison with cross-sectional imaging in resected cases Wesali, Sahar Demir, Mehmet A. Verbeke, Caroline S. Andersson, Mats Bratlie, Svein Olav Sadik, Riadh Surg Endosc Article BACKGROUND: Imaging modalities for characterizing pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) is a known uncertainty. The aim of this prospective study was to compare the diagnostic performance of endoscopic ultrasound morphology, cytology and cyst fluid carcinoembryonic antigen (EUS-FNA-CEA) with cross-sectional imaging in resected PCLs. METHODS: The cross-sectional imaging and EUS-FNA-CEA results were collected in an academic tertiary referral centre using histology of the surgical specimen as the diagnostic standard. RESULTS: Of 289 patients undergoing evaluation for PCL with cross-sectional imaging and EUS-FNA between February 2007 and March 2017, 58 underwent surgical resection providing a final diagnosis of the PCLs: 45 mucinous, 5 serous, 1 pseudocyst, 2 endocrine, 2 solid pseudopapillary neoplasms and 3 other. EUS-FNA-CEA was more accurate than cross-sectional imaging in diagnosing mucinous PCLs (95% vs. 83%, p = 0.04). Ninety-two percent of the PCLs with high-grade dysplasia or adenocarcinoma were smaller than 3 cm in diameter. The sensitivity of EUS-FNA-CEA and cross-sectional imaging for detecting PCLs with high-grade dysplasia or adenocarcinoma were 33% and 5% (p = 0.03), respectively. However, there was no difference in accuracy between the modalities (62% vs. 66%, p = 0.79). The sensitivity for detecting pancreatic adenocarcinomas only was 64% for EUS-FNA-CEA and 9% for cross-sectional imaging (p = 0.03). Overall, EUS-FNA-CEA provided a correct diagnosis in more patients with PCLs than cross-sectional imaging (72% vs. 50%, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: EUS-FNA-CEA is accurate and should be considered a complementary test in the diagnosis of PCLs. However, the detection of PCLs with high-grade dysplasia or adenocarcinoma needs to be improved. Cyst size does not seem to be a reliable predictor of high-grade dysplasia or adenocarcinoma. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00464-020-08166-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2020-12-01 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8599246/ /pubmed/33259018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08166-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Wesali, Sahar
Demir, Mehmet A.
Verbeke, Caroline S.
Andersson, Mats
Bratlie, Svein Olav
Sadik, Riadh
EUS is accurate in characterizing pancreatic cystic lesions; a prospective comparison with cross-sectional imaging in resected cases
title EUS is accurate in characterizing pancreatic cystic lesions; a prospective comparison with cross-sectional imaging in resected cases
title_full EUS is accurate in characterizing pancreatic cystic lesions; a prospective comparison with cross-sectional imaging in resected cases
title_fullStr EUS is accurate in characterizing pancreatic cystic lesions; a prospective comparison with cross-sectional imaging in resected cases
title_full_unstemmed EUS is accurate in characterizing pancreatic cystic lesions; a prospective comparison with cross-sectional imaging in resected cases
title_short EUS is accurate in characterizing pancreatic cystic lesions; a prospective comparison with cross-sectional imaging in resected cases
title_sort eus is accurate in characterizing pancreatic cystic lesions; a prospective comparison with cross-sectional imaging in resected cases
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8599246/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33259018
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08166-3
work_keys_str_mv AT wesalisahar eusisaccurateincharacterizingpancreaticcysticlesionsaprospectivecomparisonwithcrosssectionalimaginginresectedcases
AT demirmehmeta eusisaccurateincharacterizingpancreaticcysticlesionsaprospectivecomparisonwithcrosssectionalimaginginresectedcases
AT verbekecarolines eusisaccurateincharacterizingpancreaticcysticlesionsaprospectivecomparisonwithcrosssectionalimaginginresectedcases
AT anderssonmats eusisaccurateincharacterizingpancreaticcysticlesionsaprospectivecomparisonwithcrosssectionalimaginginresectedcases
AT bratliesveinolav eusisaccurateincharacterizingpancreaticcysticlesionsaprospectivecomparisonwithcrosssectionalimaginginresectedcases
AT sadikriadh eusisaccurateincharacterizingpancreaticcysticlesionsaprospectivecomparisonwithcrosssectionalimaginginresectedcases