Cargando…
Procedural virtual reality simulation training for robotic surgery: a randomised controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Virtual reality (VR) training is widely used for surgical training, supported by comprehensive, high-quality validation. Technological advances have enabled the development of procedural-based VR training. This study assesses the effectiveness of procedural VR compared to basic skills VR...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8599326/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33398587 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08197-w |
_version_ | 1784600924312829952 |
---|---|
author | Raison, Nicholas Harrison, Patrick Abe, Takashige Aydin, Abdullatif Ahmed, Kamran Dasgupta, Prokar |
author_facet | Raison, Nicholas Harrison, Patrick Abe, Takashige Aydin, Abdullatif Ahmed, Kamran Dasgupta, Prokar |
author_sort | Raison, Nicholas |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Virtual reality (VR) training is widely used for surgical training, supported by comprehensive, high-quality validation. Technological advances have enabled the development of procedural-based VR training. This study assesses the effectiveness of procedural VR compared to basic skills VR in minimally invasive surgery. METHODS: 26 novice participants were randomised to either procedural VR (n = 13) or basic VR simulation (n = 13). Both cohorts completed a structured training programme. Simulator metric data were used to plot learning curves. All participants then performed parts of a robotic radical prostatectomy (RARP) on a fresh frozen cadaver. Performances were compared against a cohort of 9 control participants without any training experience. Performances were video recorded and assessed blindly using GEARS post hoc. RESULTS: Learning curve analysis demonstrated improvements in technical skill for both training modalities although procedural training was associated with greater training effects. Any VR training resulted in significantly higher GEARS scores than no training (GEARS score 11.3 ± 0.58 vs. 8.8 ± 2.9, p = 0.002). Procedural VR training was found to be more effective than both basic VR training and no training (GEARS 11.9 ± 2.9 vs. 10.7 ± 2.8 vs. 8.8 ± 1.4, respectively, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: This trial has shown that a structured programme of procedural VR simulation is effective for robotic training with technical skills successfully transferred to a clinical task in cadavers. Further work to evaluate the role of procedural-based VR for more advanced surgical skills training is required. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00464-020-08197-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8599326 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85993262021-11-24 Procedural virtual reality simulation training for robotic surgery: a randomised controlled trial Raison, Nicholas Harrison, Patrick Abe, Takashige Aydin, Abdullatif Ahmed, Kamran Dasgupta, Prokar Surg Endosc Article BACKGROUND: Virtual reality (VR) training is widely used for surgical training, supported by comprehensive, high-quality validation. Technological advances have enabled the development of procedural-based VR training. This study assesses the effectiveness of procedural VR compared to basic skills VR in minimally invasive surgery. METHODS: 26 novice participants were randomised to either procedural VR (n = 13) or basic VR simulation (n = 13). Both cohorts completed a structured training programme. Simulator metric data were used to plot learning curves. All participants then performed parts of a robotic radical prostatectomy (RARP) on a fresh frozen cadaver. Performances were compared against a cohort of 9 control participants without any training experience. Performances were video recorded and assessed blindly using GEARS post hoc. RESULTS: Learning curve analysis demonstrated improvements in technical skill for both training modalities although procedural training was associated with greater training effects. Any VR training resulted in significantly higher GEARS scores than no training (GEARS score 11.3 ± 0.58 vs. 8.8 ± 2.9, p = 0.002). Procedural VR training was found to be more effective than both basic VR training and no training (GEARS 11.9 ± 2.9 vs. 10.7 ± 2.8 vs. 8.8 ± 1.4, respectively, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: This trial has shown that a structured programme of procedural VR simulation is effective for robotic training with technical skills successfully transferred to a clinical task in cadavers. Further work to evaluate the role of procedural-based VR for more advanced surgical skills training is required. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00464-020-08197-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2021-01-04 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8599326/ /pubmed/33398587 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08197-w Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Raison, Nicholas Harrison, Patrick Abe, Takashige Aydin, Abdullatif Ahmed, Kamran Dasgupta, Prokar Procedural virtual reality simulation training for robotic surgery: a randomised controlled trial |
title | Procedural virtual reality simulation training for robotic surgery: a randomised controlled trial |
title_full | Procedural virtual reality simulation training for robotic surgery: a randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Procedural virtual reality simulation training for robotic surgery: a randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Procedural virtual reality simulation training for robotic surgery: a randomised controlled trial |
title_short | Procedural virtual reality simulation training for robotic surgery: a randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | procedural virtual reality simulation training for robotic surgery: a randomised controlled trial |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8599326/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33398587 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08197-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT raisonnicholas proceduralvirtualrealitysimulationtrainingforroboticsurgeryarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT harrisonpatrick proceduralvirtualrealitysimulationtrainingforroboticsurgeryarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT abetakashige proceduralvirtualrealitysimulationtrainingforroboticsurgeryarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT aydinabdullatif proceduralvirtualrealitysimulationtrainingforroboticsurgeryarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT ahmedkamran proceduralvirtualrealitysimulationtrainingforroboticsurgeryarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT dasguptaprokar proceduralvirtualrealitysimulationtrainingforroboticsurgeryarandomisedcontrolledtrial |