Cargando…

Procedural virtual reality simulation training for robotic surgery: a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Virtual reality (VR) training is widely used for surgical training, supported by comprehensive, high-quality validation. Technological advances have enabled the development of procedural-based VR training. This study assesses the effectiveness of procedural VR compared to basic skills VR...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Raison, Nicholas, Harrison, Patrick, Abe, Takashige, Aydin, Abdullatif, Ahmed, Kamran, Dasgupta, Prokar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8599326/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33398587
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08197-w
_version_ 1784600924312829952
author Raison, Nicholas
Harrison, Patrick
Abe, Takashige
Aydin, Abdullatif
Ahmed, Kamran
Dasgupta, Prokar
author_facet Raison, Nicholas
Harrison, Patrick
Abe, Takashige
Aydin, Abdullatif
Ahmed, Kamran
Dasgupta, Prokar
author_sort Raison, Nicholas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Virtual reality (VR) training is widely used for surgical training, supported by comprehensive, high-quality validation. Technological advances have enabled the development of procedural-based VR training. This study assesses the effectiveness of procedural VR compared to basic skills VR in minimally invasive surgery. METHODS: 26 novice participants were randomised to either procedural VR (n = 13) or basic VR simulation (n = 13). Both cohorts completed a structured training programme. Simulator metric data were used to plot learning curves. All participants then performed parts of a robotic radical prostatectomy (RARP) on a fresh frozen cadaver. Performances were compared against a cohort of 9 control participants without any training experience. Performances were video recorded and assessed blindly using GEARS post hoc. RESULTS: Learning curve analysis demonstrated improvements in technical skill for both training modalities although procedural training was associated with greater training effects. Any VR training resulted in significantly higher GEARS scores than no training (GEARS score 11.3 ± 0.58 vs. 8.8 ± 2.9, p = 0.002). Procedural VR training was found to be more effective than both basic VR training and no training (GEARS 11.9 ± 2.9 vs. 10.7 ± 2.8 vs. 8.8 ± 1.4, respectively, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: This trial has shown that a structured programme of procedural VR simulation is effective for robotic training with technical skills successfully transferred to a clinical task in cadavers. Further work to evaluate the role of procedural-based VR for more advanced surgical skills training is required. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00464-020-08197-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8599326
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85993262021-11-24 Procedural virtual reality simulation training for robotic surgery: a randomised controlled trial Raison, Nicholas Harrison, Patrick Abe, Takashige Aydin, Abdullatif Ahmed, Kamran Dasgupta, Prokar Surg Endosc Article BACKGROUND: Virtual reality (VR) training is widely used for surgical training, supported by comprehensive, high-quality validation. Technological advances have enabled the development of procedural-based VR training. This study assesses the effectiveness of procedural VR compared to basic skills VR in minimally invasive surgery. METHODS: 26 novice participants were randomised to either procedural VR (n = 13) or basic VR simulation (n = 13). Both cohorts completed a structured training programme. Simulator metric data were used to plot learning curves. All participants then performed parts of a robotic radical prostatectomy (RARP) on a fresh frozen cadaver. Performances were compared against a cohort of 9 control participants without any training experience. Performances were video recorded and assessed blindly using GEARS post hoc. RESULTS: Learning curve analysis demonstrated improvements in technical skill for both training modalities although procedural training was associated with greater training effects. Any VR training resulted in significantly higher GEARS scores than no training (GEARS score 11.3 ± 0.58 vs. 8.8 ± 2.9, p = 0.002). Procedural VR training was found to be more effective than both basic VR training and no training (GEARS 11.9 ± 2.9 vs. 10.7 ± 2.8 vs. 8.8 ± 1.4, respectively, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: This trial has shown that a structured programme of procedural VR simulation is effective for robotic training with technical skills successfully transferred to a clinical task in cadavers. Further work to evaluate the role of procedural-based VR for more advanced surgical skills training is required. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00464-020-08197-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2021-01-04 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8599326/ /pubmed/33398587 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08197-w Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Raison, Nicholas
Harrison, Patrick
Abe, Takashige
Aydin, Abdullatif
Ahmed, Kamran
Dasgupta, Prokar
Procedural virtual reality simulation training for robotic surgery: a randomised controlled trial
title Procedural virtual reality simulation training for robotic surgery: a randomised controlled trial
title_full Procedural virtual reality simulation training for robotic surgery: a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Procedural virtual reality simulation training for robotic surgery: a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Procedural virtual reality simulation training for robotic surgery: a randomised controlled trial
title_short Procedural virtual reality simulation training for robotic surgery: a randomised controlled trial
title_sort procedural virtual reality simulation training for robotic surgery: a randomised controlled trial
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8599326/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33398587
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08197-w
work_keys_str_mv AT raisonnicholas proceduralvirtualrealitysimulationtrainingforroboticsurgeryarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT harrisonpatrick proceduralvirtualrealitysimulationtrainingforroboticsurgeryarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT abetakashige proceduralvirtualrealitysimulationtrainingforroboticsurgeryarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT aydinabdullatif proceduralvirtualrealitysimulationtrainingforroboticsurgeryarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT ahmedkamran proceduralvirtualrealitysimulationtrainingforroboticsurgeryarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT dasguptaprokar proceduralvirtualrealitysimulationtrainingforroboticsurgeryarandomisedcontrolledtrial