Cargando…
Retrograde urethrography, sonouretrography and magnetic resonance urethrography in evaluation of male urethral strictures. Should the novel methods become the new standard in radiological diagnosis of urethral stricture disease?
PURPOSE: To verify which of the diagnostic modalities: Voiding cystouretrography (VCUG), Sonouretrography (SUG) or Magnetic resonance uretrography (MRU) is the most accurate in the assessment of urethral strictures in males and in what cases the application of novel imaging techniques benefits most....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8599374/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34599423 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11255-021-02994-5 |
_version_ | 1784600936803467264 |
---|---|
author | Mikolaj, Frankiewicz Karolina, Markiet Oliwia, Kozak Jakub, Krukowski Adam, Kałużny Mariusz, Belka Patrycja, Naumczyk Marcin, Matuszewski |
author_facet | Mikolaj, Frankiewicz Karolina, Markiet Oliwia, Kozak Jakub, Krukowski Adam, Kałużny Mariusz, Belka Patrycja, Naumczyk Marcin, Matuszewski |
author_sort | Mikolaj, Frankiewicz |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To verify which of the diagnostic modalities: Voiding cystouretrography (VCUG), Sonouretrography (SUG) or Magnetic resonance uretrography (MRU) is the most accurate in the assessment of urethral strictures in males and in what cases the application of novel imaging techniques benefits most. METHODS: 55 male patients with a diagnosis of urethral stricture, were enrolled in this prospective study. Initial diagnosis of urethral stricture was based on anamnesis, uroflowmetry and VCUG. Additional imaging procedures—SUG and MRU were performed before the surgery. Virtual models and 3D printed models of the urethra with the stricture were created based on the MRU data. Exact stricture length and location were evaluated by each radiological method and accuracy was verified intraoperatively. Agreement between SUG and MRU assessments of spongiofibrosis was evaluated. MRU images were independently interpreted by two radiologists (MRU 1, MRU 2) and rater reliability was calculated. RESULTS: MRU was the most accurate [(95% CI 0.786–0.882), p < 0.0005] with an average overestimation of 1.145 mm (MRU 1) and 0.727 mm (MRU 2) as compared with the operative measure. VCUG was less accurate [(95% CI 0.536–0.769), p < 0.0005] with an average underestimation of 1.509 mm as compared with operative measure. SUG was the least accurate method [(95% CI 0.510–0.776), p < 0.0005] with an average overestimation of 2.127 mm as compared with the operative measure. There was almost perfect agreement of MRU interpretations between the radiologists. CONCLUSIONS: VCUG is still considered as a ‘gold standard’ in diagnosing urethral stricture disease despite its limitations. SUG and MRU provide extra guidance in preoperative planning and should be considered as supplemental for diagnosing urethral stricture. Combination of VCUG and SUG may be an optimal set of radiological tools for diagnosing patients with urethral strictures located in the penile urethra. MRU is the most accurate method and should particularly be considered in cases of post-traumatic or multiple strictures and strictures located in the posterior urethra. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8599374 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85993742021-11-24 Retrograde urethrography, sonouretrography and magnetic resonance urethrography in evaluation of male urethral strictures. Should the novel methods become the new standard in radiological diagnosis of urethral stricture disease? Mikolaj, Frankiewicz Karolina, Markiet Oliwia, Kozak Jakub, Krukowski Adam, Kałużny Mariusz, Belka Patrycja, Naumczyk Marcin, Matuszewski Int Urol Nephrol Urology - Original Paper PURPOSE: To verify which of the diagnostic modalities: Voiding cystouretrography (VCUG), Sonouretrography (SUG) or Magnetic resonance uretrography (MRU) is the most accurate in the assessment of urethral strictures in males and in what cases the application of novel imaging techniques benefits most. METHODS: 55 male patients with a diagnosis of urethral stricture, were enrolled in this prospective study. Initial diagnosis of urethral stricture was based on anamnesis, uroflowmetry and VCUG. Additional imaging procedures—SUG and MRU were performed before the surgery. Virtual models and 3D printed models of the urethra with the stricture were created based on the MRU data. Exact stricture length and location were evaluated by each radiological method and accuracy was verified intraoperatively. Agreement between SUG and MRU assessments of spongiofibrosis was evaluated. MRU images were independently interpreted by two radiologists (MRU 1, MRU 2) and rater reliability was calculated. RESULTS: MRU was the most accurate [(95% CI 0.786–0.882), p < 0.0005] with an average overestimation of 1.145 mm (MRU 1) and 0.727 mm (MRU 2) as compared with the operative measure. VCUG was less accurate [(95% CI 0.536–0.769), p < 0.0005] with an average underestimation of 1.509 mm as compared with operative measure. SUG was the least accurate method [(95% CI 0.510–0.776), p < 0.0005] with an average overestimation of 2.127 mm as compared with the operative measure. There was almost perfect agreement of MRU interpretations between the radiologists. CONCLUSIONS: VCUG is still considered as a ‘gold standard’ in diagnosing urethral stricture disease despite its limitations. SUG and MRU provide extra guidance in preoperative planning and should be considered as supplemental for diagnosing urethral stricture. Combination of VCUG and SUG may be an optimal set of radiological tools for diagnosing patients with urethral strictures located in the penile urethra. MRU is the most accurate method and should particularly be considered in cases of post-traumatic or multiple strictures and strictures located in the posterior urethra. Springer Netherlands 2021-10-02 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8599374/ /pubmed/34599423 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11255-021-02994-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Urology - Original Paper Mikolaj, Frankiewicz Karolina, Markiet Oliwia, Kozak Jakub, Krukowski Adam, Kałużny Mariusz, Belka Patrycja, Naumczyk Marcin, Matuszewski Retrograde urethrography, sonouretrography and magnetic resonance urethrography in evaluation of male urethral strictures. Should the novel methods become the new standard in radiological diagnosis of urethral stricture disease? |
title | Retrograde urethrography, sonouretrography and magnetic resonance urethrography in evaluation of male urethral strictures. Should the novel methods become the new standard in radiological diagnosis of urethral stricture disease? |
title_full | Retrograde urethrography, sonouretrography and magnetic resonance urethrography in evaluation of male urethral strictures. Should the novel methods become the new standard in radiological diagnosis of urethral stricture disease? |
title_fullStr | Retrograde urethrography, sonouretrography and magnetic resonance urethrography in evaluation of male urethral strictures. Should the novel methods become the new standard in radiological diagnosis of urethral stricture disease? |
title_full_unstemmed | Retrograde urethrography, sonouretrography and magnetic resonance urethrography in evaluation of male urethral strictures. Should the novel methods become the new standard in radiological diagnosis of urethral stricture disease? |
title_short | Retrograde urethrography, sonouretrography and magnetic resonance urethrography in evaluation of male urethral strictures. Should the novel methods become the new standard in radiological diagnosis of urethral stricture disease? |
title_sort | retrograde urethrography, sonouretrography and magnetic resonance urethrography in evaluation of male urethral strictures. should the novel methods become the new standard in radiological diagnosis of urethral stricture disease? |
topic | Urology - Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8599374/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34599423 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11255-021-02994-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mikolajfrankiewicz retrogradeurethrographysonouretrographyandmagneticresonanceurethrographyinevaluationofmaleurethralstricturesshouldthenovelmethodsbecomethenewstandardinradiologicaldiagnosisofurethralstricturedisease AT karolinamarkiet retrogradeurethrographysonouretrographyandmagneticresonanceurethrographyinevaluationofmaleurethralstricturesshouldthenovelmethodsbecomethenewstandardinradiologicaldiagnosisofurethralstricturedisease AT oliwiakozak retrogradeurethrographysonouretrographyandmagneticresonanceurethrographyinevaluationofmaleurethralstricturesshouldthenovelmethodsbecomethenewstandardinradiologicaldiagnosisofurethralstricturedisease AT jakubkrukowski retrogradeurethrographysonouretrographyandmagneticresonanceurethrographyinevaluationofmaleurethralstricturesshouldthenovelmethodsbecomethenewstandardinradiologicaldiagnosisofurethralstricturedisease AT adamkałuzny retrogradeurethrographysonouretrographyandmagneticresonanceurethrographyinevaluationofmaleurethralstricturesshouldthenovelmethodsbecomethenewstandardinradiologicaldiagnosisofurethralstricturedisease AT mariuszbelka retrogradeurethrographysonouretrographyandmagneticresonanceurethrographyinevaluationofmaleurethralstricturesshouldthenovelmethodsbecomethenewstandardinradiologicaldiagnosisofurethralstricturedisease AT patrycjanaumczyk retrogradeurethrographysonouretrographyandmagneticresonanceurethrographyinevaluationofmaleurethralstricturesshouldthenovelmethodsbecomethenewstandardinradiologicaldiagnosisofurethralstricturedisease AT marcinmatuszewski retrogradeurethrographysonouretrographyandmagneticresonanceurethrographyinevaluationofmaleurethralstricturesshouldthenovelmethodsbecomethenewstandardinradiologicaldiagnosisofurethralstricturedisease |