Cargando…

Influence of advanced shoe technology on the top 100 annual performances in men’s marathon from 2015 to 2019

The NIKE Vaporfly shoe was introduced in May 2017 as part of the original #Breaking2 Project (an event aimed to run the first marathon under 2 h). This new advanced shoe technology (NAST) changed the footwear design conception. The aim of this study was (i) to analyse the effect of NAST in men’s mar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rodrigo-Carranza, Víctor, González-Mohíno, Fernando, Santos del Cerro, Jesús, Santos-Concejero, Jordan, González-Ravé, José María
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8599511/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34789828
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-01807-0
_version_ 1784600976744775680
author Rodrigo-Carranza, Víctor
González-Mohíno, Fernando
Santos del Cerro, Jesús
Santos-Concejero, Jordan
González-Ravé, José María
author_facet Rodrigo-Carranza, Víctor
González-Mohíno, Fernando
Santos del Cerro, Jesús
Santos-Concejero, Jordan
González-Ravé, José María
author_sort Rodrigo-Carranza, Víctor
collection PubMed
description The NIKE Vaporfly shoe was introduced in May 2017 as part of the original #Breaking2 Project (an event aimed to run the first marathon under 2 h). This new advanced shoe technology (NAST) changed the footwear design conception. The aim of this study was (i) to analyse the effect of NAST in men’s marathon performance, (ii) to analyse whether the changes in the environmental constraints (temperature and wind) and orography of the marathons, age and birthplace of the runners has changed from 2015 to 2019 and (iii) to analyse the impact of NAST on the historical 50 best performances. Data from top-100 men's marathon performances were collected in that timeframe. The shoes used by the athletes were identified (in 91.8% of the cases) by publicly available photographs. External and environmental conditions of each marathon and age and birthplace of the runners were also analysed. Marathon performances improved from 2017 onwards between 0.75 and 1.50% compared to 2015 and 2016 (p < 0.05). In addition, the improvement was greater in the upper deciles than in the lower ones (p < 0.001). Runners wearing NAST ran ~ 1% faster in marathon compared to runners that did not use it (p < 0.001). When conducting an individual analysis of athletes who ran with and without NAST, 72.5% of the athletes who completed a marathon wearing NAST improved their performance by 0.68% (p < 0.01). External and environmental conditions, age or birthplace of runners seems not to have influenced this performance improvement. NAST has had a clear impact on marathon performance unchanged in the environmental constraints (temperature and wind), orography, age, and birthplace of the runners but with differences between venues.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8599511
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85995112021-11-19 Influence of advanced shoe technology on the top 100 annual performances in men’s marathon from 2015 to 2019 Rodrigo-Carranza, Víctor González-Mohíno, Fernando Santos del Cerro, Jesús Santos-Concejero, Jordan González-Ravé, José María Sci Rep Article The NIKE Vaporfly shoe was introduced in May 2017 as part of the original #Breaking2 Project (an event aimed to run the first marathon under 2 h). This new advanced shoe technology (NAST) changed the footwear design conception. The aim of this study was (i) to analyse the effect of NAST in men’s marathon performance, (ii) to analyse whether the changes in the environmental constraints (temperature and wind) and orography of the marathons, age and birthplace of the runners has changed from 2015 to 2019 and (iii) to analyse the impact of NAST on the historical 50 best performances. Data from top-100 men's marathon performances were collected in that timeframe. The shoes used by the athletes were identified (in 91.8% of the cases) by publicly available photographs. External and environmental conditions of each marathon and age and birthplace of the runners were also analysed. Marathon performances improved from 2017 onwards between 0.75 and 1.50% compared to 2015 and 2016 (p < 0.05). In addition, the improvement was greater in the upper deciles than in the lower ones (p < 0.001). Runners wearing NAST ran ~ 1% faster in marathon compared to runners that did not use it (p < 0.001). When conducting an individual analysis of athletes who ran with and without NAST, 72.5% of the athletes who completed a marathon wearing NAST improved their performance by 0.68% (p < 0.01). External and environmental conditions, age or birthplace of runners seems not to have influenced this performance improvement. NAST has had a clear impact on marathon performance unchanged in the environmental constraints (temperature and wind), orography, age, and birthplace of the runners but with differences between venues. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8599511/ /pubmed/34789828 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-01807-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Rodrigo-Carranza, Víctor
González-Mohíno, Fernando
Santos del Cerro, Jesús
Santos-Concejero, Jordan
González-Ravé, José María
Influence of advanced shoe technology on the top 100 annual performances in men’s marathon from 2015 to 2019
title Influence of advanced shoe technology on the top 100 annual performances in men’s marathon from 2015 to 2019
title_full Influence of advanced shoe technology on the top 100 annual performances in men’s marathon from 2015 to 2019
title_fullStr Influence of advanced shoe technology on the top 100 annual performances in men’s marathon from 2015 to 2019
title_full_unstemmed Influence of advanced shoe technology on the top 100 annual performances in men’s marathon from 2015 to 2019
title_short Influence of advanced shoe technology on the top 100 annual performances in men’s marathon from 2015 to 2019
title_sort influence of advanced shoe technology on the top 100 annual performances in men’s marathon from 2015 to 2019
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8599511/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34789828
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-01807-0
work_keys_str_mv AT rodrigocarranzavictor influenceofadvancedshoetechnologyonthetop100annualperformancesinmensmarathonfrom2015to2019
AT gonzalezmohinofernando influenceofadvancedshoetechnologyonthetop100annualperformancesinmensmarathonfrom2015to2019
AT santosdelcerrojesus influenceofadvancedshoetechnologyonthetop100annualperformancesinmensmarathonfrom2015to2019
AT santosconcejerojordan influenceofadvancedshoetechnologyonthetop100annualperformancesinmensmarathonfrom2015to2019
AT gonzalezravejosemaria influenceofadvancedshoetechnologyonthetop100annualperformancesinmensmarathonfrom2015to2019