Cargando…

The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 vs. the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression in Assessing Major Depressive Disorder

Background: The Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD-17) has been used for several decades to assess the severity of depression. Multiple studies have documented defects in this scale and deemed it unsuitable for clinical evaluation. The HAMD-6, which is the abbreviated version of HAMD-17, has...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ma, Simeng, Yang, Jun, Yang, Bingxiang, Kang, Lijun, Wang, Peilin, Zhang, Nan, Wang, Wei, Zong, Xiaofen, Wang, Ying, Bai, Hanping, Guo, Qingshan, Yao, Lihua, Fang, Li, Liu, Zhongchun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8599822/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34803766
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.747139
_version_ 1784601026772336640
author Ma, Simeng
Yang, Jun
Yang, Bingxiang
Kang, Lijun
Wang, Peilin
Zhang, Nan
Wang, Wei
Zong, Xiaofen
Wang, Ying
Bai, Hanping
Guo, Qingshan
Yao, Lihua
Fang, Li
Liu, Zhongchun
author_facet Ma, Simeng
Yang, Jun
Yang, Bingxiang
Kang, Lijun
Wang, Peilin
Zhang, Nan
Wang, Wei
Zong, Xiaofen
Wang, Ying
Bai, Hanping
Guo, Qingshan
Yao, Lihua
Fang, Li
Liu, Zhongchun
author_sort Ma, Simeng
collection PubMed
description Background: The Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD-17) has been used for several decades to assess the severity of depression. Multiple studies have documented defects in this scale and deemed it unsuitable for clinical evaluation. The HAMD-6, which is the abbreviated version of HAMD-17, has been shown to be effective in assessing the core symptoms of depression with greater sensitivity than HAMD-17. And the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) is suggested as an effective alternative to the HAMD-17 because of its simplicity and ease-of-use. Methods: Research was completed involving 1,741 participants having major depressive disorder. Cronbach's alpha, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and weighted Kappa analysis was used to determine the reliability of the scales. Pearson correlation analysis and factor analysis were used to analyze validity. Item response theory (IRT) was used to analyze psychological characteristics of items in both the HAMD-17 and PHQ-9. Results: Reliability analysis showed that the Cronbach's alpha of the HAMD-17, HAMD-6 and PHQ-9 were 0.829, 0.764, and 0.893 respectively, and the ICC of the three scales ranged from 0.606 to 0.744. The Kappa score of the consistency of depression severity assessment was 0.248. Validity analysis showed that the PHQ-9 was a single factor structure, and the total score of the scale was strongly correlated with the HAMD-17 (r = 0.724, P < 0.001). The IRT analysis showed that the discrimination parameters of the PHQ-9 were higher than that of the HAMD-17 in all dimensions. The HAMD-6 had the lowest measurement accuracy in distinguishing the severity of depression, while the PHQ-9 had the highest measurement accuracy. Conclusion: Results showed that the PHQ-9 was satisfactory in terms of reliability, validity and distinguishing the severity of depression. It is a simple, rapid, effective and reliable tool which can be used as an alternative to the HAMD-17 to assess the severity of depression.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8599822
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85998222021-11-19 The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 vs. the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression in Assessing Major Depressive Disorder Ma, Simeng Yang, Jun Yang, Bingxiang Kang, Lijun Wang, Peilin Zhang, Nan Wang, Wei Zong, Xiaofen Wang, Ying Bai, Hanping Guo, Qingshan Yao, Lihua Fang, Li Liu, Zhongchun Front Psychiatry Psychiatry Background: The Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD-17) has been used for several decades to assess the severity of depression. Multiple studies have documented defects in this scale and deemed it unsuitable for clinical evaluation. The HAMD-6, which is the abbreviated version of HAMD-17, has been shown to be effective in assessing the core symptoms of depression with greater sensitivity than HAMD-17. And the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) is suggested as an effective alternative to the HAMD-17 because of its simplicity and ease-of-use. Methods: Research was completed involving 1,741 participants having major depressive disorder. Cronbach's alpha, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and weighted Kappa analysis was used to determine the reliability of the scales. Pearson correlation analysis and factor analysis were used to analyze validity. Item response theory (IRT) was used to analyze psychological characteristics of items in both the HAMD-17 and PHQ-9. Results: Reliability analysis showed that the Cronbach's alpha of the HAMD-17, HAMD-6 and PHQ-9 were 0.829, 0.764, and 0.893 respectively, and the ICC of the three scales ranged from 0.606 to 0.744. The Kappa score of the consistency of depression severity assessment was 0.248. Validity analysis showed that the PHQ-9 was a single factor structure, and the total score of the scale was strongly correlated with the HAMD-17 (r = 0.724, P < 0.001). The IRT analysis showed that the discrimination parameters of the PHQ-9 were higher than that of the HAMD-17 in all dimensions. The HAMD-6 had the lowest measurement accuracy in distinguishing the severity of depression, while the PHQ-9 had the highest measurement accuracy. Conclusion: Results showed that the PHQ-9 was satisfactory in terms of reliability, validity and distinguishing the severity of depression. It is a simple, rapid, effective and reliable tool which can be used as an alternative to the HAMD-17 to assess the severity of depression. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8599822/ /pubmed/34803766 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.747139 Text en Copyright © 2021 Ma, Yang, Yang, Kang, Wang, Zhang, Wang, Zong, Wang, Bai, Guo, Yao, Fang and Liu. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychiatry
Ma, Simeng
Yang, Jun
Yang, Bingxiang
Kang, Lijun
Wang, Peilin
Zhang, Nan
Wang, Wei
Zong, Xiaofen
Wang, Ying
Bai, Hanping
Guo, Qingshan
Yao, Lihua
Fang, Li
Liu, Zhongchun
The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 vs. the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression in Assessing Major Depressive Disorder
title The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 vs. the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression in Assessing Major Depressive Disorder
title_full The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 vs. the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression in Assessing Major Depressive Disorder
title_fullStr The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 vs. the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression in Assessing Major Depressive Disorder
title_full_unstemmed The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 vs. the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression in Assessing Major Depressive Disorder
title_short The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 vs. the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression in Assessing Major Depressive Disorder
title_sort patient health questionnaire-9 vs. the hamilton rating scale for depression in assessing major depressive disorder
topic Psychiatry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8599822/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34803766
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.747139
work_keys_str_mv AT masimeng thepatienthealthquestionnaire9vsthehamiltonratingscalefordepressioninassessingmajordepressivedisorder
AT yangjun thepatienthealthquestionnaire9vsthehamiltonratingscalefordepressioninassessingmajordepressivedisorder
AT yangbingxiang thepatienthealthquestionnaire9vsthehamiltonratingscalefordepressioninassessingmajordepressivedisorder
AT kanglijun thepatienthealthquestionnaire9vsthehamiltonratingscalefordepressioninassessingmajordepressivedisorder
AT wangpeilin thepatienthealthquestionnaire9vsthehamiltonratingscalefordepressioninassessingmajordepressivedisorder
AT zhangnan thepatienthealthquestionnaire9vsthehamiltonratingscalefordepressioninassessingmajordepressivedisorder
AT wangwei thepatienthealthquestionnaire9vsthehamiltonratingscalefordepressioninassessingmajordepressivedisorder
AT zongxiaofen thepatienthealthquestionnaire9vsthehamiltonratingscalefordepressioninassessingmajordepressivedisorder
AT wangying thepatienthealthquestionnaire9vsthehamiltonratingscalefordepressioninassessingmajordepressivedisorder
AT baihanping thepatienthealthquestionnaire9vsthehamiltonratingscalefordepressioninassessingmajordepressivedisorder
AT guoqingshan thepatienthealthquestionnaire9vsthehamiltonratingscalefordepressioninassessingmajordepressivedisorder
AT yaolihua thepatienthealthquestionnaire9vsthehamiltonratingscalefordepressioninassessingmajordepressivedisorder
AT fangli thepatienthealthquestionnaire9vsthehamiltonratingscalefordepressioninassessingmajordepressivedisorder
AT liuzhongchun thepatienthealthquestionnaire9vsthehamiltonratingscalefordepressioninassessingmajordepressivedisorder
AT masimeng patienthealthquestionnaire9vsthehamiltonratingscalefordepressioninassessingmajordepressivedisorder
AT yangjun patienthealthquestionnaire9vsthehamiltonratingscalefordepressioninassessingmajordepressivedisorder
AT yangbingxiang patienthealthquestionnaire9vsthehamiltonratingscalefordepressioninassessingmajordepressivedisorder
AT kanglijun patienthealthquestionnaire9vsthehamiltonratingscalefordepressioninassessingmajordepressivedisorder
AT wangpeilin patienthealthquestionnaire9vsthehamiltonratingscalefordepressioninassessingmajordepressivedisorder
AT zhangnan patienthealthquestionnaire9vsthehamiltonratingscalefordepressioninassessingmajordepressivedisorder
AT wangwei patienthealthquestionnaire9vsthehamiltonratingscalefordepressioninassessingmajordepressivedisorder
AT zongxiaofen patienthealthquestionnaire9vsthehamiltonratingscalefordepressioninassessingmajordepressivedisorder
AT wangying patienthealthquestionnaire9vsthehamiltonratingscalefordepressioninassessingmajordepressivedisorder
AT baihanping patienthealthquestionnaire9vsthehamiltonratingscalefordepressioninassessingmajordepressivedisorder
AT guoqingshan patienthealthquestionnaire9vsthehamiltonratingscalefordepressioninassessingmajordepressivedisorder
AT yaolihua patienthealthquestionnaire9vsthehamiltonratingscalefordepressioninassessingmajordepressivedisorder
AT fangli patienthealthquestionnaire9vsthehamiltonratingscalefordepressioninassessingmajordepressivedisorder
AT liuzhongchun patienthealthquestionnaire9vsthehamiltonratingscalefordepressioninassessingmajordepressivedisorder