Cargando…

Creeping Bentgrass Yield Prediction With Machine Learning Models

Nitrogen is the most limiting nutrient for turfgrass growth. Instead of pursuing the maximum yield, most turfgrass managers use nitrogen (N) to maintain a sub-maximal growth rate. Few tools or soil tests exist to help managers guide N fertilizer decisions. Turf growth prediction models have the pote...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhou, Qiyu, Soldat, Douglas J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8600360/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34804091
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.749854
_version_ 1784601139982893056
author Zhou, Qiyu
Soldat, Douglas J.
author_facet Zhou, Qiyu
Soldat, Douglas J.
author_sort Zhou, Qiyu
collection PubMed
description Nitrogen is the most limiting nutrient for turfgrass growth. Instead of pursuing the maximum yield, most turfgrass managers use nitrogen (N) to maintain a sub-maximal growth rate. Few tools or soil tests exist to help managers guide N fertilizer decisions. Turf growth prediction models have the potential to be useful, but the currently existing turf growth prediction model only takes temperature into account, limiting its accuracy. This study developed machine-learning-based turf growth models using the random forest (RF) algorithm to estimate short-term turfgrass clipping yield. To build the RF model, a large set of variables were extracted as predictors including the 7-day weather, traffic intensity, soil moisture content, N fertilization rate, and the normalized difference red edge (NDRE) vegetation index. In this study, the data were collected from two putting greens where the turfgrass received 0 to 1,800 round/week traffic rates, various irrigation rates to maintain the soil moisture content between 9 and 29%, and N fertilization rates of 0 to 17.5 kg ha(–1) applied biweekly. The RF model agreed with the actual clipping yield collected from the experimental results. The temperature and relative humidity were the most important weather factors. Including NDRE improved the prediction accuracy of the model. The highest coefficient of determination (R(2)) of the RF model was 0.64 for the training dataset and was 0.47 for the testing data set upon the evaluation of the model. This represented a large improvement over the existing growth prediction model (R(2) = 0.01). However, the machine-learning models created were not able to accurately predict the clipping production at other locations. Individual golf courses can create customized growth prediction models using clipping volume to eliminate the deviation caused by temporal and spatial variability. Overall, this study demonstrated the feasibility of creating machine-learning-based yield prediction models that may be able to guide N fertilization decisions on golf course putting greens and presumably other turfgrass areas.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8600360
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86003602021-11-19 Creeping Bentgrass Yield Prediction With Machine Learning Models Zhou, Qiyu Soldat, Douglas J. Front Plant Sci Plant Science Nitrogen is the most limiting nutrient for turfgrass growth. Instead of pursuing the maximum yield, most turfgrass managers use nitrogen (N) to maintain a sub-maximal growth rate. Few tools or soil tests exist to help managers guide N fertilizer decisions. Turf growth prediction models have the potential to be useful, but the currently existing turf growth prediction model only takes temperature into account, limiting its accuracy. This study developed machine-learning-based turf growth models using the random forest (RF) algorithm to estimate short-term turfgrass clipping yield. To build the RF model, a large set of variables were extracted as predictors including the 7-day weather, traffic intensity, soil moisture content, N fertilization rate, and the normalized difference red edge (NDRE) vegetation index. In this study, the data were collected from two putting greens where the turfgrass received 0 to 1,800 round/week traffic rates, various irrigation rates to maintain the soil moisture content between 9 and 29%, and N fertilization rates of 0 to 17.5 kg ha(–1) applied biweekly. The RF model agreed with the actual clipping yield collected from the experimental results. The temperature and relative humidity were the most important weather factors. Including NDRE improved the prediction accuracy of the model. The highest coefficient of determination (R(2)) of the RF model was 0.64 for the training dataset and was 0.47 for the testing data set upon the evaluation of the model. This represented a large improvement over the existing growth prediction model (R(2) = 0.01). However, the machine-learning models created were not able to accurately predict the clipping production at other locations. Individual golf courses can create customized growth prediction models using clipping volume to eliminate the deviation caused by temporal and spatial variability. Overall, this study demonstrated the feasibility of creating machine-learning-based yield prediction models that may be able to guide N fertilization decisions on golf course putting greens and presumably other turfgrass areas. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8600360/ /pubmed/34804091 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.749854 Text en Copyright © 2021 Zhou and Soldat. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Plant Science
Zhou, Qiyu
Soldat, Douglas J.
Creeping Bentgrass Yield Prediction With Machine Learning Models
title Creeping Bentgrass Yield Prediction With Machine Learning Models
title_full Creeping Bentgrass Yield Prediction With Machine Learning Models
title_fullStr Creeping Bentgrass Yield Prediction With Machine Learning Models
title_full_unstemmed Creeping Bentgrass Yield Prediction With Machine Learning Models
title_short Creeping Bentgrass Yield Prediction With Machine Learning Models
title_sort creeping bentgrass yield prediction with machine learning models
topic Plant Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8600360/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34804091
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.749854
work_keys_str_mv AT zhouqiyu creepingbentgrassyieldpredictionwithmachinelearningmodels
AT soldatdouglasj creepingbentgrassyieldpredictionwithmachinelearningmodels