Cargando…

Telemedicine in Intensive Care Units: Scoping Review

BACKGROUND: The role of telemedicine in intensive care has been increasing steadily. Tele–intensive care unit (ICU) interventions are varied and can be used in different levels of treatment, often with direct implications for the intensive care processes. Although a substantial body of primary and s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guinemer, Camille, Boeker, Martin, Fürstenau, Daniel, Poncette, Akira-Sebastian, Weiss, Björn, Mörgeli, Rudolf, Balzer, Felix
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8600441/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34730547
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/32264
_version_ 1784601158242795520
author Guinemer, Camille
Boeker, Martin
Fürstenau, Daniel
Poncette, Akira-Sebastian
Weiss, Björn
Mörgeli, Rudolf
Balzer, Felix
author_facet Guinemer, Camille
Boeker, Martin
Fürstenau, Daniel
Poncette, Akira-Sebastian
Weiss, Björn
Mörgeli, Rudolf
Balzer, Felix
author_sort Guinemer, Camille
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The role of telemedicine in intensive care has been increasing steadily. Tele–intensive care unit (ICU) interventions are varied and can be used in different levels of treatment, often with direct implications for the intensive care processes. Although a substantial body of primary and secondary literature has been published on the topic, there is a need for broadening the understanding of the organizational factors influencing the effectiveness of telemedical interventions in the ICU. OBJECTIVE: This scoping review aims to provide a map of existing evidence on tele-ICU interventions, focusing on the analysis of the implementation context and identifying areas for further technological research. METHODS: A research protocol outlining the method has been published in JMIR Research Protocols. This review follows the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews). A core research team was assembled to provide feedback and discuss findings. RESULTS: A total of 3019 results were retrieved. After screening, 25 studies were included in the final analysis. We were able to characterize the context of tele-ICU studies and identify three use cases for tele-ICU interventions. The first use case is extending coverage, which describes interventions aimed at extending the availability of intensive care capabilities. The second use case is improving compliance, which includes interventions targeted at improving patient safety, intensive care best practices, and quality of care. The third use case, facilitating transfer, describes telemedicine interventions targeted toward the management of patient transfers to or from the ICU. CONCLUSIONS: The benefits of tele-ICU interventions have been well documented for centralized systems aimed at extending critical care capabilities in a community setting and improving care compliance in tertiary hospitals. No strong evidence has been found on the reduction of patient transfers following tele-ICU intervention. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.2196/19695
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8600441
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86004412021-12-07 Telemedicine in Intensive Care Units: Scoping Review Guinemer, Camille Boeker, Martin Fürstenau, Daniel Poncette, Akira-Sebastian Weiss, Björn Mörgeli, Rudolf Balzer, Felix J Med Internet Res Review BACKGROUND: The role of telemedicine in intensive care has been increasing steadily. Tele–intensive care unit (ICU) interventions are varied and can be used in different levels of treatment, often with direct implications for the intensive care processes. Although a substantial body of primary and secondary literature has been published on the topic, there is a need for broadening the understanding of the organizational factors influencing the effectiveness of telemedical interventions in the ICU. OBJECTIVE: This scoping review aims to provide a map of existing evidence on tele-ICU interventions, focusing on the analysis of the implementation context and identifying areas for further technological research. METHODS: A research protocol outlining the method has been published in JMIR Research Protocols. This review follows the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews). A core research team was assembled to provide feedback and discuss findings. RESULTS: A total of 3019 results were retrieved. After screening, 25 studies were included in the final analysis. We were able to characterize the context of tele-ICU studies and identify three use cases for tele-ICU interventions. The first use case is extending coverage, which describes interventions aimed at extending the availability of intensive care capabilities. The second use case is improving compliance, which includes interventions targeted at improving patient safety, intensive care best practices, and quality of care. The third use case, facilitating transfer, describes telemedicine interventions targeted toward the management of patient transfers to or from the ICU. CONCLUSIONS: The benefits of tele-ICU interventions have been well documented for centralized systems aimed at extending critical care capabilities in a community setting and improving care compliance in tertiary hospitals. No strong evidence has been found on the reduction of patient transfers following tele-ICU intervention. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.2196/19695 JMIR Publications 2021-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8600441/ /pubmed/34730547 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/32264 Text en ©Camille Guinemer, Martin Boeker, Daniel Fürstenau, Akira-Sebastian Poncette, Björn Weiss, Rudolf Mörgeli, Felix Balzer. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 03.11.2021. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Review
Guinemer, Camille
Boeker, Martin
Fürstenau, Daniel
Poncette, Akira-Sebastian
Weiss, Björn
Mörgeli, Rudolf
Balzer, Felix
Telemedicine in Intensive Care Units: Scoping Review
title Telemedicine in Intensive Care Units: Scoping Review
title_full Telemedicine in Intensive Care Units: Scoping Review
title_fullStr Telemedicine in Intensive Care Units: Scoping Review
title_full_unstemmed Telemedicine in Intensive Care Units: Scoping Review
title_short Telemedicine in Intensive Care Units: Scoping Review
title_sort telemedicine in intensive care units: scoping review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8600441/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34730547
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/32264
work_keys_str_mv AT guinemercamille telemedicineinintensivecareunitsscopingreview
AT boekermartin telemedicineinintensivecareunitsscopingreview
AT furstenaudaniel telemedicineinintensivecareunitsscopingreview
AT poncetteakirasebastian telemedicineinintensivecareunitsscopingreview
AT weissbjorn telemedicineinintensivecareunitsscopingreview
AT morgelirudolf telemedicineinintensivecareunitsscopingreview
AT balzerfelix telemedicineinintensivecareunitsscopingreview