Engineered Repeat Protein Hybrids: The New Horizon for Biologic Medicines and Diagnostic Tools

[Image: see text] The last decades have witnessed unprecedented scientific breakthroughs in all the fields of knowledge, from basic sciences to translational research, resulting in the drastic improvement of the lifespan and overall quality of life. However, despite these great advances, the treatment and diagnosis of some diseases remain a challenge. Inspired by nature, scientists have been exploring biomolecules and their derivatives as novel therapeutic/diagnostic agents. Among biomolecules, proteins raise much interest due to their high versatility, biocompatibility, and biodegradability. Protein binders (binders) are proteins that bind other proteins, in certain cases, inhibiting or modulating their action. Given their therapeutic potential, binders are emerging as the next generation of biopharmaceuticals. The most well-known example of binders are antibodies, and inspired by them researchers have developed alternative binders using protein design approaches. Protein design can be based on naturally occurring proteins in which, by means of rational design or combinatorial approaches, new binding interfaces can be engineered to obtain specific functions or based on de novo proteins emerging from state-of-the-art computational methodologies. Among the novel designed proteins, a class of engineered repeat proteins, the consensus tetratricopeptide repeat (CTPR) proteins, stand out due to their stability and robustness. The CTPR unit is a helix-turn-helix motif constituted of 34 amino acids, of which only 8 are essential to ensure correct folding of the structure. The small number of conserved residues of CTPR proteins leaves plenty of freedom for functional mutations, making them a base scaffold that can be easily and reproducibly tailored to endow desired functions to the protein. For example, the introduction of metal-binding residues (e.g., histidines, cysteines) drives the coordination of metal ions and the subsequent formation of nanomaterials. Additionally, the CTPR unit can be conjugated with other peptides/proteins or repeated in tandem to encode larger CTPR proteins with superhelical structures. These properties allow for the design of both binder and nanomaterial-coordination modules as well as their combination within the same molecule, making the CTPR proteins, as we have demonstrated in several recent examples, the ideal platform to develop protein–nanomaterial hybrids. Generally, the fusion of two distinct materials exploits the best properties of each; however, in protein–nanomaterial hybrids, the fusion takes on a new dimension as new properties arise. These hybrids have ushered the use of protein-based nanomaterials as biopharmaceuticals beyond their original therapeutic scope and paved the way for their use as theranostic agents. Despite several reports of protein-stabilized nanomaterials found in the literature, these systems offer limited control in the synthesis and properties of the grown nanomaterials, as the protein acts just as a stabilizing agent with no significant functional contribution. Therefore, the rational design of protein-based nanomaterials as true theranostic agents is still incipient. In this context, CTPR proteins have emerged as promising scaffolds to hold simultaneously therapeutic and diagnostic functions through protein engineering, as it has been recently demonstrated in pioneering in vitro and in vivo examples.