Cargando…
Permissive hypotension/hypotensive resuscitation and restricted/controlled resuscitation in patients with severe trauma
Achieving a balance between organ perfusion and hemostasis is critical for optimal fluid resuscitation in patients with severe trauma. The concept of “permissive hypotension” refers to managing trauma patients by restricting the amount of resuscitation fluid and maintaining blood pressure in the low...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8600688/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34798698 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40560-016-0202-z |
_version_ | 1784601202025037824 |
---|---|
author | Kudo, Daisuke Yoshida, Yoshitaro Kushimoto, Shigeki |
author_facet | Kudo, Daisuke Yoshida, Yoshitaro Kushimoto, Shigeki |
author_sort | Kudo, Daisuke |
collection | PubMed |
description | Achieving a balance between organ perfusion and hemostasis is critical for optimal fluid resuscitation in patients with severe trauma. The concept of “permissive hypotension” refers to managing trauma patients by restricting the amount of resuscitation fluid and maintaining blood pressure in the lower than normal range if there is continuing bleeding during the acute period of injury. This treatment approach may avoid the adverse effects of early, high-dose fluid resuscitation, such as dilutional coagulopathy and acceleration of hemorrhage, but does carry the potential risk of tissue hypoperfusion. Current clinical guidelines recommend the use of permissive hypotension and controlled resuscitation. However, it is not mentioned which subjects would receive most benefit from this approach, when considering factors such as age, injury mechanism, setting, or the presence or absence of hypotension. Recently, two randomized clinical trials examined the efficacy of titrating blood pressure in younger patients with shock secondary to either penetrating or blunt injury; in both trials, overall mortality was not improved. Another two major clinical trials suggest that controlled resuscitation may be safe in patients with blunt injury in the pre-hospital setting and possibly lead to improved outcomes, especially in patients with pre-hospital hypotension. Some animal studies suggest that hypotensive resuscitation may improve outcomes in subjects with penetrating injury where bleeding occurs from only one site. On the other hand, hypotensive resuscitation in blunt trauma may worsen outcomes due to tissue hypoperfusion. The influence of these approaches on coagulation has not been sufficiently examined, even in animal studies. The effectiveness of permissive hypotension/hypotensive resuscitation and restricted/controlled resuscitation is still inconclusive, even when examining systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Further investigation is needed to elucidate the effectiveness of these approaches, so as to develop improved treatment strategies which take into account coagulopathy in the pathophysiology of trauma. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8600688 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86006882021-11-19 Permissive hypotension/hypotensive resuscitation and restricted/controlled resuscitation in patients with severe trauma Kudo, Daisuke Yoshida, Yoshitaro Kushimoto, Shigeki J Intensive Care Review Achieving a balance between organ perfusion and hemostasis is critical for optimal fluid resuscitation in patients with severe trauma. The concept of “permissive hypotension” refers to managing trauma patients by restricting the amount of resuscitation fluid and maintaining blood pressure in the lower than normal range if there is continuing bleeding during the acute period of injury. This treatment approach may avoid the adverse effects of early, high-dose fluid resuscitation, such as dilutional coagulopathy and acceleration of hemorrhage, but does carry the potential risk of tissue hypoperfusion. Current clinical guidelines recommend the use of permissive hypotension and controlled resuscitation. However, it is not mentioned which subjects would receive most benefit from this approach, when considering factors such as age, injury mechanism, setting, or the presence or absence of hypotension. Recently, two randomized clinical trials examined the efficacy of titrating blood pressure in younger patients with shock secondary to either penetrating or blunt injury; in both trials, overall mortality was not improved. Another two major clinical trials suggest that controlled resuscitation may be safe in patients with blunt injury in the pre-hospital setting and possibly lead to improved outcomes, especially in patients with pre-hospital hypotension. Some animal studies suggest that hypotensive resuscitation may improve outcomes in subjects with penetrating injury where bleeding occurs from only one site. On the other hand, hypotensive resuscitation in blunt trauma may worsen outcomes due to tissue hypoperfusion. The influence of these approaches on coagulation has not been sufficiently examined, even in animal studies. The effectiveness of permissive hypotension/hypotensive resuscitation and restricted/controlled resuscitation is still inconclusive, even when examining systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Further investigation is needed to elucidate the effectiveness of these approaches, so as to develop improved treatment strategies which take into account coagulopathy in the pathophysiology of trauma. BioMed Central 2017-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8600688/ /pubmed/34798698 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40560-016-0202-z Text en © The Author(s). 2017 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Review Kudo, Daisuke Yoshida, Yoshitaro Kushimoto, Shigeki Permissive hypotension/hypotensive resuscitation and restricted/controlled resuscitation in patients with severe trauma |
title | Permissive hypotension/hypotensive resuscitation and restricted/controlled resuscitation in patients with severe trauma |
title_full | Permissive hypotension/hypotensive resuscitation and restricted/controlled resuscitation in patients with severe trauma |
title_fullStr | Permissive hypotension/hypotensive resuscitation and restricted/controlled resuscitation in patients with severe trauma |
title_full_unstemmed | Permissive hypotension/hypotensive resuscitation and restricted/controlled resuscitation in patients with severe trauma |
title_short | Permissive hypotension/hypotensive resuscitation and restricted/controlled resuscitation in patients with severe trauma |
title_sort | permissive hypotension/hypotensive resuscitation and restricted/controlled resuscitation in patients with severe trauma |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8600688/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34798698 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40560-016-0202-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kudodaisuke permissivehypotensionhypotensiveresuscitationandrestrictedcontrolledresuscitationinpatientswithseveretrauma AT yoshidayoshitaro permissivehypotensionhypotensiveresuscitationandrestrictedcontrolledresuscitationinpatientswithseveretrauma AT kushimotoshigeki permissivehypotensionhypotensiveresuscitationandrestrictedcontrolledresuscitationinpatientswithseveretrauma |