Cargando…

Which elements were significant in reducing obstetric anal sphincter injury? A prospective follow-up study

BACKGROUND: To examine which elements of an obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) care bundle were protective for OASI. Several interventional trials showed that application of a care bundle involving a hands-on approach to perineal protection may reduce the risk of OASI. Previously, we found that...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rasmussen, Ole Bredahl, Yding, Annika, Andersen, Charlotte Sander, Boris, Jane, Lauszus, Finn Friis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8600779/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34794417
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-04260-z
_version_ 1784601220978049024
author Rasmussen, Ole Bredahl
Yding, Annika
Andersen, Charlotte Sander
Boris, Jane
Lauszus, Finn Friis
author_facet Rasmussen, Ole Bredahl
Yding, Annika
Andersen, Charlotte Sander
Boris, Jane
Lauszus, Finn Friis
author_sort Rasmussen, Ole Bredahl
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To examine which elements of an obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) care bundle were protective for OASI. Several interventional trials showed that application of a care bundle involving a hands-on approach to perineal protection may reduce the risk of OASI. Previously, we found that only the element “hand on the fetal head” in itself was protective, although the risk of a type 2 error was calculated to be 50%. METHODS: A prospective follow-up study in an obstetric department in Denmark with 3200 deliveries per year. We included a cohort of 10,383 women giving birth vaginally from gestational week 22 + 0 from 2016 through 2019. We documented on a person-level the five elements of the care bundle together with maternal and obstetrical characteristics. The elements were 1) communication, 2) visible perineum, 3) hand on fetal head, 4) perineal support and 5) certification. Regression analysis was used for analysis of associations. The primary outcome measure was OASI. RESULTS: The total rate of OASI in vaginally delivering women was 1.9%. The incidence was 3.2% in nulliparous women giving birth vaginally. The rate of cesarean section was 16.5% and for episiotomy 2.4%. The reduction in the incidence of OASI was sustained since 2013. Hand on the fetal head and perineal support both were protective factors for OASI. In case of a nulliparous woman with a neonate weighing 3500 g giving birth spontaneously, the relative risk (RR) for OASI was 0.50 (95% CI 0.49- 0.51) with use of hand on the fetal head together with perineal support against no use. Similarly, with a nulliparous woman giving birth to a neonate of 3500 g by vacuum extraction, the RR for OASI was 0.65 (95% CI 0.62-0.68) against no use. CONCLUSIONS: Both hand on the fetal head and perineal support were associated with a reduced risk of OASI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8600779
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86007792021-11-19 Which elements were significant in reducing obstetric anal sphincter injury? A prospective follow-up study Rasmussen, Ole Bredahl Yding, Annika Andersen, Charlotte Sander Boris, Jane Lauszus, Finn Friis BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: To examine which elements of an obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) care bundle were protective for OASI. Several interventional trials showed that application of a care bundle involving a hands-on approach to perineal protection may reduce the risk of OASI. Previously, we found that only the element “hand on the fetal head” in itself was protective, although the risk of a type 2 error was calculated to be 50%. METHODS: A prospective follow-up study in an obstetric department in Denmark with 3200 deliveries per year. We included a cohort of 10,383 women giving birth vaginally from gestational week 22 + 0 from 2016 through 2019. We documented on a person-level the five elements of the care bundle together with maternal and obstetrical characteristics. The elements were 1) communication, 2) visible perineum, 3) hand on fetal head, 4) perineal support and 5) certification. Regression analysis was used for analysis of associations. The primary outcome measure was OASI. RESULTS: The total rate of OASI in vaginally delivering women was 1.9%. The incidence was 3.2% in nulliparous women giving birth vaginally. The rate of cesarean section was 16.5% and for episiotomy 2.4%. The reduction in the incidence of OASI was sustained since 2013. Hand on the fetal head and perineal support both were protective factors for OASI. In case of a nulliparous woman with a neonate weighing 3500 g giving birth spontaneously, the relative risk (RR) for OASI was 0.50 (95% CI 0.49- 0.51) with use of hand on the fetal head together with perineal support against no use. Similarly, with a nulliparous woman giving birth to a neonate of 3500 g by vacuum extraction, the RR for OASI was 0.65 (95% CI 0.62-0.68) against no use. CONCLUSIONS: Both hand on the fetal head and perineal support were associated with a reduced risk of OASI. BioMed Central 2021-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8600779/ /pubmed/34794417 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-04260-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Rasmussen, Ole Bredahl
Yding, Annika
Andersen, Charlotte Sander
Boris, Jane
Lauszus, Finn Friis
Which elements were significant in reducing obstetric anal sphincter injury? A prospective follow-up study
title Which elements were significant in reducing obstetric anal sphincter injury? A prospective follow-up study
title_full Which elements were significant in reducing obstetric anal sphincter injury? A prospective follow-up study
title_fullStr Which elements were significant in reducing obstetric anal sphincter injury? A prospective follow-up study
title_full_unstemmed Which elements were significant in reducing obstetric anal sphincter injury? A prospective follow-up study
title_short Which elements were significant in reducing obstetric anal sphincter injury? A prospective follow-up study
title_sort which elements were significant in reducing obstetric anal sphincter injury? a prospective follow-up study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8600779/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34794417
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-04260-z
work_keys_str_mv AT rasmussenolebredahl whichelementsweresignificantinreducingobstetricanalsphincterinjuryaprospectivefollowupstudy
AT ydingannika whichelementsweresignificantinreducingobstetricanalsphincterinjuryaprospectivefollowupstudy
AT andersencharlottesander whichelementsweresignificantinreducingobstetricanalsphincterinjuryaprospectivefollowupstudy
AT borisjane whichelementsweresignificantinreducingobstetricanalsphincterinjuryaprospectivefollowupstudy
AT lauszusfinnfriis whichelementsweresignificantinreducingobstetricanalsphincterinjuryaprospectivefollowupstudy