Cargando…
Clinical Prognostic Factors for Patients With Esophageal Cancer Treated With Definitive Chemoradiotherapy
Background Treatment with definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the best option for patients with locally advanced esophageal tumors considered unresectable or for patients without clinical conditions to undergo surgical treatment. Technological advances in radiotherapy in the last decades have made...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8601089/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34820218 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.18894 |
_version_ | 1784601274887438336 |
---|---|
author | Favareto, Sergio L Sousa, Cecilia F Pinto, Pedro J Ramos, Henderson Chen, Michael J Castro, Douglas G Silva, Maria L Gondim, Guilherme Pellizzon, Antonio Cassio A Fogaroli, Ricardo C |
author_facet | Favareto, Sergio L Sousa, Cecilia F Pinto, Pedro J Ramos, Henderson Chen, Michael J Castro, Douglas G Silva, Maria L Gondim, Guilherme Pellizzon, Antonio Cassio A Fogaroli, Ricardo C |
author_sort | Favareto, Sergio L |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background Treatment with definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the best option for patients with locally advanced esophageal tumors considered unresectable or for patients without clinical conditions to undergo surgical treatment. Technological advances in radiotherapy in the last decades have made treatment more accurate with less toxicity, and the association with more effective systemic treatment has been gradually improving survival rates. Aim Evaluate clinical prognostic factors for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with esophageal cancer treated with definitive radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy (ChT). Material and methods The clinical records of 60 patients treated from April 2011 until December 2019 with esophageal cancer considered unresectable and/or without clinical conditions for surgery, treated with definitive CRT, were analyzed. All patients had upper digestive endoscopy (UDE) with positive biopsy, neck, chest, and abdominal CT scan, and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography (PET-CT). Patients were followed with physical examination and CTs every three months in the first and second years and every six months from the third year of follow-up. UDE was made every three to six months after the end of the treatment or in suspicion of tumor recurrence. PET-CT was also performed in the follow-up when clinically necessary. Local and regional failure (LRF) was defined as abnormalities in the image tests within the planning target volume (PTV) and/or positive biopsy on UDE. Any other failure was defined as a distant failure (DF). PFS was defined in the record of the first tumor recurrence site and OS in the death record from the date of the start of treatment. Results The median age of the patients was 66 years (range: 33 to 83 years) and 46 patients (76.7%) were male. Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) was the most frequent histological type (85%). Most patients had tumors located in the mid-thoracic esophagus (53.3%) and stage III or IV (59.9%). All patients were treated using 3D (76.7%) or intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT; 23.3%). The median total dose was 50.4Gy (41.4-50.4). All patients received platinum-based ChT concomitant with RT. The most common regimen used was carboplatin and paclitaxel, with a median of five cycles. With a median follow-up of 19 months, the median PFS and OS were 10 and 20 months, respectively. LRF and DF as the first site of failure were observed in 22 (36.6%) and 26 (43.3%) patients, respectively. In the univariate analysis, tumor length lower than 2.6 cm, gross tumor volume (GTV) volume lower than 28 cm(3), clinical tumor stages T1 and T2, clinical node stage N0, clinical prognostic stage groups I and II, and complete response to treatment, were statistically significant factors for better PFS and OS. In the multivariate analysis, the presence of clinical nodal stage N0 was related to better PFS (p=0.02). Conclusion Node clinical status was the most important clinical factor for PFS. Despite all the technical progress observed in radiotherapy, treatments concomitant with platinum-based chemotherapy are associated with high levels of LRF and DF. New strategies in systemic therapy and radiotherapy are necessary for improving outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8601089 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86010892021-11-23 Clinical Prognostic Factors for Patients With Esophageal Cancer Treated With Definitive Chemoradiotherapy Favareto, Sergio L Sousa, Cecilia F Pinto, Pedro J Ramos, Henderson Chen, Michael J Castro, Douglas G Silva, Maria L Gondim, Guilherme Pellizzon, Antonio Cassio A Fogaroli, Ricardo C Cureus Radiation Oncology Background Treatment with definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the best option for patients with locally advanced esophageal tumors considered unresectable or for patients without clinical conditions to undergo surgical treatment. Technological advances in radiotherapy in the last decades have made treatment more accurate with less toxicity, and the association with more effective systemic treatment has been gradually improving survival rates. Aim Evaluate clinical prognostic factors for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with esophageal cancer treated with definitive radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy (ChT). Material and methods The clinical records of 60 patients treated from April 2011 until December 2019 with esophageal cancer considered unresectable and/or without clinical conditions for surgery, treated with definitive CRT, were analyzed. All patients had upper digestive endoscopy (UDE) with positive biopsy, neck, chest, and abdominal CT scan, and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography (PET-CT). Patients were followed with physical examination and CTs every three months in the first and second years and every six months from the third year of follow-up. UDE was made every three to six months after the end of the treatment or in suspicion of tumor recurrence. PET-CT was also performed in the follow-up when clinically necessary. Local and regional failure (LRF) was defined as abnormalities in the image tests within the planning target volume (PTV) and/or positive biopsy on UDE. Any other failure was defined as a distant failure (DF). PFS was defined in the record of the first tumor recurrence site and OS in the death record from the date of the start of treatment. Results The median age of the patients was 66 years (range: 33 to 83 years) and 46 patients (76.7%) were male. Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) was the most frequent histological type (85%). Most patients had tumors located in the mid-thoracic esophagus (53.3%) and stage III or IV (59.9%). All patients were treated using 3D (76.7%) or intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT; 23.3%). The median total dose was 50.4Gy (41.4-50.4). All patients received platinum-based ChT concomitant with RT. The most common regimen used was carboplatin and paclitaxel, with a median of five cycles. With a median follow-up of 19 months, the median PFS and OS were 10 and 20 months, respectively. LRF and DF as the first site of failure were observed in 22 (36.6%) and 26 (43.3%) patients, respectively. In the univariate analysis, tumor length lower than 2.6 cm, gross tumor volume (GTV) volume lower than 28 cm(3), clinical tumor stages T1 and T2, clinical node stage N0, clinical prognostic stage groups I and II, and complete response to treatment, were statistically significant factors for better PFS and OS. In the multivariate analysis, the presence of clinical nodal stage N0 was related to better PFS (p=0.02). Conclusion Node clinical status was the most important clinical factor for PFS. Despite all the technical progress observed in radiotherapy, treatments concomitant with platinum-based chemotherapy are associated with high levels of LRF and DF. New strategies in systemic therapy and radiotherapy are necessary for improving outcomes. Cureus 2021-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8601089/ /pubmed/34820218 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.18894 Text en Copyright © 2021, Favareto et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Favareto, Sergio L Sousa, Cecilia F Pinto, Pedro J Ramos, Henderson Chen, Michael J Castro, Douglas G Silva, Maria L Gondim, Guilherme Pellizzon, Antonio Cassio A Fogaroli, Ricardo C Clinical Prognostic Factors for Patients With Esophageal Cancer Treated With Definitive Chemoradiotherapy |
title | Clinical Prognostic Factors for Patients With Esophageal Cancer Treated With Definitive Chemoradiotherapy |
title_full | Clinical Prognostic Factors for Patients With Esophageal Cancer Treated With Definitive Chemoradiotherapy |
title_fullStr | Clinical Prognostic Factors for Patients With Esophageal Cancer Treated With Definitive Chemoradiotherapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical Prognostic Factors for Patients With Esophageal Cancer Treated With Definitive Chemoradiotherapy |
title_short | Clinical Prognostic Factors for Patients With Esophageal Cancer Treated With Definitive Chemoradiotherapy |
title_sort | clinical prognostic factors for patients with esophageal cancer treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy |
topic | Radiation Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8601089/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34820218 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.18894 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT favaretosergiol clinicalprognosticfactorsforpatientswithesophagealcancertreatedwithdefinitivechemoradiotherapy AT sousaceciliaf clinicalprognosticfactorsforpatientswithesophagealcancertreatedwithdefinitivechemoradiotherapy AT pintopedroj clinicalprognosticfactorsforpatientswithesophagealcancertreatedwithdefinitivechemoradiotherapy AT ramoshenderson clinicalprognosticfactorsforpatientswithesophagealcancertreatedwithdefinitivechemoradiotherapy AT chenmichaelj clinicalprognosticfactorsforpatientswithesophagealcancertreatedwithdefinitivechemoradiotherapy AT castrodouglasg clinicalprognosticfactorsforpatientswithesophagealcancertreatedwithdefinitivechemoradiotherapy AT silvamarial clinicalprognosticfactorsforpatientswithesophagealcancertreatedwithdefinitivechemoradiotherapy AT gondimguilherme clinicalprognosticfactorsforpatientswithesophagealcancertreatedwithdefinitivechemoradiotherapy AT pellizzonantoniocassioa clinicalprognosticfactorsforpatientswithesophagealcancertreatedwithdefinitivechemoradiotherapy AT fogaroliricardoc clinicalprognosticfactorsforpatientswithesophagealcancertreatedwithdefinitivechemoradiotherapy |