Cargando…

Differential health and economic impacts from the COVID-19 lockdown between the developed and developing countries: Perspective on air pollution()

It is enlightening to determine the discrepancies and potential reasons for the degree of impact from the COVID-19 control measures on air quality as well as the associated health and economic impacts. Analysis of air quality, socio-economic factors, and meteorological data from 447 cities in 46 cou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Yichen, Wu, Rui, Liu, Lang, Yuan, Yuan, Liu, ChenGuang, Hang Ho, Steven Sai, Ren, Honghao, Wang, Qiyuan, Lv, Yang, Yan, Mengyuan, Cao, Junji
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Ltd. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8601204/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34801622
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.118544
Descripción
Sumario:It is enlightening to determine the discrepancies and potential reasons for the degree of impact from the COVID-19 control measures on air quality as well as the associated health and economic impacts. Analysis of air quality, socio-economic factors, and meteorological data from 447 cities in 46 countries indicated that the COVID-19 control measures had significant impacts on the PM(2.5) (particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter less than 2.5 μm) concentrations in 20 (reduced PM(2.5) concentrations of −7.4–29.1 μg m(−3)) of the selected 46 countries. In these 20 countries, the robustly distinguished changes in the PM(2.5) concentrations caused by the control measures differed between the developed (95% confidence interval (CI): −2.7–5.5 μg m(−3)) and developing countries (95% CI: 8.3–23.2 μg m(−3)). As a result, the COVID-19 lockdown reduced death and hospital admissions change from the decreased PM(2.5) concentrations by 7909 and 82,025 cases in the 12 developing countries, and by 78 and 1214 cases in the eight developed countries. The COVID-19 lockdown reduced the economic cost from the PM(2.5) related health burden by 54.0 million dollars in the 12 developing countries and by 8.3 million dollars in the eight developed countries. The disparity was related to the different chemical compositions of PM(2.5). In particular, the concentrations of primary PM(2.5) (e.g., BC) in cities of developing countries were 3–45 times higher than those in developed countries, so the mass concentration of PM(2.5) was more sensitive to the reduced local emissions in developing countries during the COVID-19 control period. The mass fractions of secondary PM(2.5) in developed countries were generally higher than those in developing countries. As a result, these countries were more sensitive to the secondary atmospheric processing that may have been enhanced due to reduced local emissions.