Cargando…
Efficacy and Safety of Vilobelimab (IFX-1), a Novel Monoclonal Anti-C5a Antibody, in Patients With Early Severe Sepsis or Septic Shock—A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Multicenter, Phase IIa Trial (SCIENS Study)
Anaphylatoxin C5a, a proinflammatory complement split product, plays a central role in mediating organ dysfunction. OBJECTIVES: This phase II clinical trial was conducted to study safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of vilobelimab, a recombinant monoclonal antibody against C...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8601347/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34806021 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000577 |
_version_ | 1784601326761541632 |
---|---|
author | Bauer, Michael Weyland, Andreas Marx, Gernot Bloos, Frank Weber, Stephan Weiler, Norbert Kluge, Stefan Diers, Anja Simon, Tim Philipp Lautenschläger, Ingmar Gründling, Matthias Jaschinski, Ulrich Simon, Philipp Nierhaus, Axel Moerer, Onnen Reill, Lorenz Jörres, Achim Guo, Renfeng Loeffler, Markus Reinhart, Konrad Riedemann, Niels |
author_facet | Bauer, Michael Weyland, Andreas Marx, Gernot Bloos, Frank Weber, Stephan Weiler, Norbert Kluge, Stefan Diers, Anja Simon, Tim Philipp Lautenschläger, Ingmar Gründling, Matthias Jaschinski, Ulrich Simon, Philipp Nierhaus, Axel Moerer, Onnen Reill, Lorenz Jörres, Achim Guo, Renfeng Loeffler, Markus Reinhart, Konrad Riedemann, Niels |
author_sort | Bauer, Michael |
collection | PubMed |
description | Anaphylatoxin C5a, a proinflammatory complement split product, plays a central role in mediating organ dysfunction. OBJECTIVES: This phase II clinical trial was conducted to study safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of vilobelimab, a recombinant monoclonal antibody against C5a, in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. DESIGN: Multicenter, randomized, and placebo-controlled study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Eleven multidisciplinary ICUs across Germany. Adult patients with severe sepsis or septic shock and with early onset of infection-associated organ dysfunction. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Patients were randomly assigned in a ratio of 2:1 to three subsequent dosing cohorts for IV vilobelimab or placebo receiving either 2 × 2 mg/kg (0 and 12 hr), 2 × 4 mg/kg (0 and 24 hr), and 3 × 4 mg/kg (0, 24, and 72 hr). Co-primary endpoints were pharmacodynamics (assessed by C5a concentrations), pharmacokinetics (assessed by vilobelimab concentrations), and safety of vilobelimab. Preliminary efficacy was evaluated by secondary objectives. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients were randomized (16 patients for each vilobelimab dosing cohort and eight patients for each placebo dosing cohort). Vilobelimab application was associated with dosing dependent decrease in C5a compared with baseline (p < 0.001). Duration of C5a decrease increased with more frequent dosing. Membrane attack complex lysis capacity measured by 50% hemolytic complement was not affected. Vilobelimab was well tolerated with similar safety findings in all dose cohorts. No vilobelimab-specific adverse events emerged. For vilobelimab-treated patients, investigators attributed less treatment-emergent adverse events as related compared with placebo. Dosing cohorts 2 and 3 had the highest ICU-free and ventilator-free days. There was no difference in mortality, vasopressor-free days, or renal replacement therapy-free days between the groups. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Administration of vilobelimab in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock selectively neutralizes C5a in a dose-dependent manner without blocking formation of the membrane attack complex and without resulting in detected safety issues. The data warrant further investigation of C5a inhibition in sepsis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8601347 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86013472021-11-19 Efficacy and Safety of Vilobelimab (IFX-1), a Novel Monoclonal Anti-C5a Antibody, in Patients With Early Severe Sepsis or Septic Shock—A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Multicenter, Phase IIa Trial (SCIENS Study) Bauer, Michael Weyland, Andreas Marx, Gernot Bloos, Frank Weber, Stephan Weiler, Norbert Kluge, Stefan Diers, Anja Simon, Tim Philipp Lautenschläger, Ingmar Gründling, Matthias Jaschinski, Ulrich Simon, Philipp Nierhaus, Axel Moerer, Onnen Reill, Lorenz Jörres, Achim Guo, Renfeng Loeffler, Markus Reinhart, Konrad Riedemann, Niels Crit Care Explor Original Clinical Report Anaphylatoxin C5a, a proinflammatory complement split product, plays a central role in mediating organ dysfunction. OBJECTIVES: This phase II clinical trial was conducted to study safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of vilobelimab, a recombinant monoclonal antibody against C5a, in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. DESIGN: Multicenter, randomized, and placebo-controlled study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Eleven multidisciplinary ICUs across Germany. Adult patients with severe sepsis or septic shock and with early onset of infection-associated organ dysfunction. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Patients were randomly assigned in a ratio of 2:1 to three subsequent dosing cohorts for IV vilobelimab or placebo receiving either 2 × 2 mg/kg (0 and 12 hr), 2 × 4 mg/kg (0 and 24 hr), and 3 × 4 mg/kg (0, 24, and 72 hr). Co-primary endpoints were pharmacodynamics (assessed by C5a concentrations), pharmacokinetics (assessed by vilobelimab concentrations), and safety of vilobelimab. Preliminary efficacy was evaluated by secondary objectives. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients were randomized (16 patients for each vilobelimab dosing cohort and eight patients for each placebo dosing cohort). Vilobelimab application was associated with dosing dependent decrease in C5a compared with baseline (p < 0.001). Duration of C5a decrease increased with more frequent dosing. Membrane attack complex lysis capacity measured by 50% hemolytic complement was not affected. Vilobelimab was well tolerated with similar safety findings in all dose cohorts. No vilobelimab-specific adverse events emerged. For vilobelimab-treated patients, investigators attributed less treatment-emergent adverse events as related compared with placebo. Dosing cohorts 2 and 3 had the highest ICU-free and ventilator-free days. There was no difference in mortality, vasopressor-free days, or renal replacement therapy-free days between the groups. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Administration of vilobelimab in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock selectively neutralizes C5a in a dose-dependent manner without blocking formation of the membrane attack complex and without resulting in detected safety issues. The data warrant further investigation of C5a inhibition in sepsis. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8601347/ /pubmed/34806021 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000577 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Society of Critical Care Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Original Clinical Report Bauer, Michael Weyland, Andreas Marx, Gernot Bloos, Frank Weber, Stephan Weiler, Norbert Kluge, Stefan Diers, Anja Simon, Tim Philipp Lautenschläger, Ingmar Gründling, Matthias Jaschinski, Ulrich Simon, Philipp Nierhaus, Axel Moerer, Onnen Reill, Lorenz Jörres, Achim Guo, Renfeng Loeffler, Markus Reinhart, Konrad Riedemann, Niels Efficacy and Safety of Vilobelimab (IFX-1), a Novel Monoclonal Anti-C5a Antibody, in Patients With Early Severe Sepsis or Septic Shock—A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Multicenter, Phase IIa Trial (SCIENS Study) |
title | Efficacy and Safety of Vilobelimab (IFX-1), a Novel Monoclonal Anti-C5a Antibody, in Patients With Early Severe Sepsis or Septic Shock—A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Multicenter, Phase IIa Trial (SCIENS Study) |
title_full | Efficacy and Safety of Vilobelimab (IFX-1), a Novel Monoclonal Anti-C5a Antibody, in Patients With Early Severe Sepsis or Septic Shock—A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Multicenter, Phase IIa Trial (SCIENS Study) |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and Safety of Vilobelimab (IFX-1), a Novel Monoclonal Anti-C5a Antibody, in Patients With Early Severe Sepsis or Septic Shock—A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Multicenter, Phase IIa Trial (SCIENS Study) |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and Safety of Vilobelimab (IFX-1), a Novel Monoclonal Anti-C5a Antibody, in Patients With Early Severe Sepsis or Septic Shock—A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Multicenter, Phase IIa Trial (SCIENS Study) |
title_short | Efficacy and Safety of Vilobelimab (IFX-1), a Novel Monoclonal Anti-C5a Antibody, in Patients With Early Severe Sepsis or Septic Shock—A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Multicenter, Phase IIa Trial (SCIENS Study) |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of vilobelimab (ifx-1), a novel monoclonal anti-c5a antibody, in patients with early severe sepsis or septic shock—a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicenter, phase iia trial (sciens study) |
topic | Original Clinical Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8601347/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34806021 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000577 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bauermichael efficacyandsafetyofvilobelimabifx1anovelmonoclonalantic5aantibodyinpatientswithearlyseveresepsisorsepticshockarandomizedplacebocontrolleddoubleblindmulticenterphaseiiatrialsciensstudy AT weylandandreas efficacyandsafetyofvilobelimabifx1anovelmonoclonalantic5aantibodyinpatientswithearlyseveresepsisorsepticshockarandomizedplacebocontrolleddoubleblindmulticenterphaseiiatrialsciensstudy AT marxgernot efficacyandsafetyofvilobelimabifx1anovelmonoclonalantic5aantibodyinpatientswithearlyseveresepsisorsepticshockarandomizedplacebocontrolleddoubleblindmulticenterphaseiiatrialsciensstudy AT bloosfrank efficacyandsafetyofvilobelimabifx1anovelmonoclonalantic5aantibodyinpatientswithearlyseveresepsisorsepticshockarandomizedplacebocontrolleddoubleblindmulticenterphaseiiatrialsciensstudy AT weberstephan efficacyandsafetyofvilobelimabifx1anovelmonoclonalantic5aantibodyinpatientswithearlyseveresepsisorsepticshockarandomizedplacebocontrolleddoubleblindmulticenterphaseiiatrialsciensstudy AT weilernorbert efficacyandsafetyofvilobelimabifx1anovelmonoclonalantic5aantibodyinpatientswithearlyseveresepsisorsepticshockarandomizedplacebocontrolleddoubleblindmulticenterphaseiiatrialsciensstudy AT klugestefan efficacyandsafetyofvilobelimabifx1anovelmonoclonalantic5aantibodyinpatientswithearlyseveresepsisorsepticshockarandomizedplacebocontrolleddoubleblindmulticenterphaseiiatrialsciensstudy AT diersanja efficacyandsafetyofvilobelimabifx1anovelmonoclonalantic5aantibodyinpatientswithearlyseveresepsisorsepticshockarandomizedplacebocontrolleddoubleblindmulticenterphaseiiatrialsciensstudy AT simontimphilipp efficacyandsafetyofvilobelimabifx1anovelmonoclonalantic5aantibodyinpatientswithearlyseveresepsisorsepticshockarandomizedplacebocontrolleddoubleblindmulticenterphaseiiatrialsciensstudy AT lautenschlageringmar efficacyandsafetyofvilobelimabifx1anovelmonoclonalantic5aantibodyinpatientswithearlyseveresepsisorsepticshockarandomizedplacebocontrolleddoubleblindmulticenterphaseiiatrialsciensstudy AT grundlingmatthias efficacyandsafetyofvilobelimabifx1anovelmonoclonalantic5aantibodyinpatientswithearlyseveresepsisorsepticshockarandomizedplacebocontrolleddoubleblindmulticenterphaseiiatrialsciensstudy AT jaschinskiulrich efficacyandsafetyofvilobelimabifx1anovelmonoclonalantic5aantibodyinpatientswithearlyseveresepsisorsepticshockarandomizedplacebocontrolleddoubleblindmulticenterphaseiiatrialsciensstudy AT simonphilipp efficacyandsafetyofvilobelimabifx1anovelmonoclonalantic5aantibodyinpatientswithearlyseveresepsisorsepticshockarandomizedplacebocontrolleddoubleblindmulticenterphaseiiatrialsciensstudy AT nierhausaxel efficacyandsafetyofvilobelimabifx1anovelmonoclonalantic5aantibodyinpatientswithearlyseveresepsisorsepticshockarandomizedplacebocontrolleddoubleblindmulticenterphaseiiatrialsciensstudy AT moereronnen efficacyandsafetyofvilobelimabifx1anovelmonoclonalantic5aantibodyinpatientswithearlyseveresepsisorsepticshockarandomizedplacebocontrolleddoubleblindmulticenterphaseiiatrialsciensstudy AT reilllorenz efficacyandsafetyofvilobelimabifx1anovelmonoclonalantic5aantibodyinpatientswithearlyseveresepsisorsepticshockarandomizedplacebocontrolleddoubleblindmulticenterphaseiiatrialsciensstudy AT jorresachim efficacyandsafetyofvilobelimabifx1anovelmonoclonalantic5aantibodyinpatientswithearlyseveresepsisorsepticshockarandomizedplacebocontrolleddoubleblindmulticenterphaseiiatrialsciensstudy AT guorenfeng efficacyandsafetyofvilobelimabifx1anovelmonoclonalantic5aantibodyinpatientswithearlyseveresepsisorsepticshockarandomizedplacebocontrolleddoubleblindmulticenterphaseiiatrialsciensstudy AT loefflermarkus efficacyandsafetyofvilobelimabifx1anovelmonoclonalantic5aantibodyinpatientswithearlyseveresepsisorsepticshockarandomizedplacebocontrolleddoubleblindmulticenterphaseiiatrialsciensstudy AT reinhartkonrad efficacyandsafetyofvilobelimabifx1anovelmonoclonalantic5aantibodyinpatientswithearlyseveresepsisorsepticshockarandomizedplacebocontrolleddoubleblindmulticenterphaseiiatrialsciensstudy AT riedemannniels efficacyandsafetyofvilobelimabifx1anovelmonoclonalantic5aantibodyinpatientswithearlyseveresepsisorsepticshockarandomizedplacebocontrolleddoubleblindmulticenterphaseiiatrialsciensstudy |