Cargando…
Patient perspectives and experiences of the rapid implementation of digital consultations during COVID-19 — a qualitative study among women with gynecological cancer
PURPOSE: Due to the first COVID-19 outbreak and subsequent restrictions, standard practice for gynecological cancer quickly evolved to include additional digital consultations. Women with gynecological cancer have a high need for information and experience a high symptom burden. We aimed to explore...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8601371/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34796401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-021-06651-6 |
_version_ | 1784601333243838464 |
---|---|
author | Christiansen, Mille Guldager Pappot, Helle Pedersen, Charlotte Jarden, Mary Mirza, Mansoor Raza Piil, Karin |
author_facet | Christiansen, Mille Guldager Pappot, Helle Pedersen, Charlotte Jarden, Mary Mirza, Mansoor Raza Piil, Karin |
author_sort | Christiansen, Mille Guldager |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Due to the first COVID-19 outbreak and subsequent restrictions, standard practice for gynecological cancer quickly evolved to include additional digital consultations. Women with gynecological cancer have a high need for information and experience a high symptom burden. We aimed to explore the experiences and perspectives of the rapid implementation of digital consultations during COVID-19. METHODS: We conducted individual telephone interviews with patients with gynecological cancer 1–4 days after a telephone or video consultation during the COVID-19 outbreak in April and May 2020. We applied Braun and Clarke’s thematic analysis to analyze the qualitative data. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients with ovarian (50%), cervical (35%), vulvar (12%), and vaginal cancer (3%) participated in the study. The patients experienced that, combined, cancer and COVID-19 restrictions made their situation twice as challenging. In general, the patients valued face-to-face consultations, recommending that they were ideal for the initial appointment to build trust. Overall, there was a willingness to participate in digital consultations because of the restrictions, but the results also showed varying degrees of openness and that individual solutions were favored. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study show that digital consultations were an accepted alternative during COVID-19. Even though this temporary solution was deemed to be beneficial for practical reasons, patients also experienced digital consultations to be impersonal. A key message is that face–to–face encounters create the foundation to establish a trusting relationship from where a valuable dialogue arises. Digital consultations should therefore be implemented with caution since no one-size-fits-all model is recommended. Among patients with gynecological cancer, however, digital technologies represent a promising and flexible method depending on the purpose of consultations, patient preferences, and needs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8601371 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86013712021-11-19 Patient perspectives and experiences of the rapid implementation of digital consultations during COVID-19 — a qualitative study among women with gynecological cancer Christiansen, Mille Guldager Pappot, Helle Pedersen, Charlotte Jarden, Mary Mirza, Mansoor Raza Piil, Karin Support Care Cancer Original Article PURPOSE: Due to the first COVID-19 outbreak and subsequent restrictions, standard practice for gynecological cancer quickly evolved to include additional digital consultations. Women with gynecological cancer have a high need for information and experience a high symptom burden. We aimed to explore the experiences and perspectives of the rapid implementation of digital consultations during COVID-19. METHODS: We conducted individual telephone interviews with patients with gynecological cancer 1–4 days after a telephone or video consultation during the COVID-19 outbreak in April and May 2020. We applied Braun and Clarke’s thematic analysis to analyze the qualitative data. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients with ovarian (50%), cervical (35%), vulvar (12%), and vaginal cancer (3%) participated in the study. The patients experienced that, combined, cancer and COVID-19 restrictions made their situation twice as challenging. In general, the patients valued face-to-face consultations, recommending that they were ideal for the initial appointment to build trust. Overall, there was a willingness to participate in digital consultations because of the restrictions, but the results also showed varying degrees of openness and that individual solutions were favored. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study show that digital consultations were an accepted alternative during COVID-19. Even though this temporary solution was deemed to be beneficial for practical reasons, patients also experienced digital consultations to be impersonal. A key message is that face–to–face encounters create the foundation to establish a trusting relationship from where a valuable dialogue arises. Digital consultations should therefore be implemented with caution since no one-size-fits-all model is recommended. Among patients with gynecological cancer, however, digital technologies represent a promising and flexible method depending on the purpose of consultations, patient preferences, and needs. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-11-18 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8601371/ /pubmed/34796401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-021-06651-6 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Christiansen, Mille Guldager Pappot, Helle Pedersen, Charlotte Jarden, Mary Mirza, Mansoor Raza Piil, Karin Patient perspectives and experiences of the rapid implementation of digital consultations during COVID-19 — a qualitative study among women with gynecological cancer |
title | Patient perspectives and experiences of the rapid implementation of digital consultations during COVID-19 — a qualitative study among women with gynecological cancer |
title_full | Patient perspectives and experiences of the rapid implementation of digital consultations during COVID-19 — a qualitative study among women with gynecological cancer |
title_fullStr | Patient perspectives and experiences of the rapid implementation of digital consultations during COVID-19 — a qualitative study among women with gynecological cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Patient perspectives and experiences of the rapid implementation of digital consultations during COVID-19 — a qualitative study among women with gynecological cancer |
title_short | Patient perspectives and experiences of the rapid implementation of digital consultations during COVID-19 — a qualitative study among women with gynecological cancer |
title_sort | patient perspectives and experiences of the rapid implementation of digital consultations during covid-19 — a qualitative study among women with gynecological cancer |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8601371/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34796401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-021-06651-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT christiansenmilleguldager patientperspectivesandexperiencesoftherapidimplementationofdigitalconsultationsduringcovid19aqualitativestudyamongwomenwithgynecologicalcancer AT pappothelle patientperspectivesandexperiencesoftherapidimplementationofdigitalconsultationsduringcovid19aqualitativestudyamongwomenwithgynecologicalcancer AT pedersencharlotte patientperspectivesandexperiencesoftherapidimplementationofdigitalconsultationsduringcovid19aqualitativestudyamongwomenwithgynecologicalcancer AT jardenmary patientperspectivesandexperiencesoftherapidimplementationofdigitalconsultationsduringcovid19aqualitativestudyamongwomenwithgynecologicalcancer AT mirzamansoorraza patientperspectivesandexperiencesoftherapidimplementationofdigitalconsultationsduringcovid19aqualitativestudyamongwomenwithgynecologicalcancer AT piilkarin patientperspectivesandexperiencesoftherapidimplementationofdigitalconsultationsduringcovid19aqualitativestudyamongwomenwithgynecologicalcancer |