Cargando…
Downstream funding success of early career researchers for resubmitted versus new applications: A matched cohort
BACKGROUND: Early career researchers face a hypercompetitive funding environment. To help identify effective intervention strategies for early career researchers, we examined whether first-time NIH R01 applicants who resubmitted their original, unfunded R01 application were more successful at obtain...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8601543/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34793439 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257559 |
_version_ | 1784601375178489856 |
---|---|
author | Doyle, Jamie Mihoko Baiocchi, Michael T. Kiernan, Michaela |
author_facet | Doyle, Jamie Mihoko Baiocchi, Michael T. Kiernan, Michaela |
author_sort | Doyle, Jamie Mihoko |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Early career researchers face a hypercompetitive funding environment. To help identify effective intervention strategies for early career researchers, we examined whether first-time NIH R01 applicants who resubmitted their original, unfunded R01 application were more successful at obtaining any R01 funding within 3 and 5 years than original, unfunded applicants who submitted new NIH applications, and we examined whether underrepresented minority (URM) applicants differentially benefited from resubmission. Our observational study is consistent with an NIH working group’s recommendations to develop interventions to encourage resubmission. METHODS AND FINDINGS: First-time applicants with US medical school academic faculty appointments who submitted an unfunded R01 application between 2000–2014 yielded 4,789 discussed and 7,019 not discussed applications. We then created comparable groups of first-time R01 applicants (resubmitted original R01 application or submitted new NIH applications) using optimal full matching that included applicant and application characteristics. Primary and subgroup analyses used generalized mixed models with obtaining any NIH R01 funding within 3 and 5 years as the two outcomes. A gamma sensitivity analysis was performed. URM applicants represented 11% and 12% of discussed and not discussed applications, respectively. First-time R01 applicants resubmitting their original, unfunded R01 application were more successful obtaining R01 funding within 3 and 5 years than applicants submitting new applications—for both discussed and not discussed applications: discussed within 3 years (OR 4.17 [95 CI 3.53, 4.93]) and 5 years (3.33 [2.82–3.92]); and not discussed within 3 years (2.81 [2.52, 3.13]) and 5 years (2.47 [2.22–2.74]). URM applicants additionally benefited within 5 years for not discussed applications. CONCLUSIONS: Encouraging early career researchers applying as faculty at a school of medicine to resubmit R01 applications is a promising potential modifiable factor and intervention strategy. First-time R01 applicants who resubmitted their original, unfunded R01 application had log-odds of obtaining downstream R01 funding within 3 and 5 years 2–4 times higher than applicants who did not resubmit their original application and submitted new NIH applications instead. Findings held for both discussed and not discussed applications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8601543 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86015432021-11-19 Downstream funding success of early career researchers for resubmitted versus new applications: A matched cohort Doyle, Jamie Mihoko Baiocchi, Michael T. Kiernan, Michaela PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Early career researchers face a hypercompetitive funding environment. To help identify effective intervention strategies for early career researchers, we examined whether first-time NIH R01 applicants who resubmitted their original, unfunded R01 application were more successful at obtaining any R01 funding within 3 and 5 years than original, unfunded applicants who submitted new NIH applications, and we examined whether underrepresented minority (URM) applicants differentially benefited from resubmission. Our observational study is consistent with an NIH working group’s recommendations to develop interventions to encourage resubmission. METHODS AND FINDINGS: First-time applicants with US medical school academic faculty appointments who submitted an unfunded R01 application between 2000–2014 yielded 4,789 discussed and 7,019 not discussed applications. We then created comparable groups of first-time R01 applicants (resubmitted original R01 application or submitted new NIH applications) using optimal full matching that included applicant and application characteristics. Primary and subgroup analyses used generalized mixed models with obtaining any NIH R01 funding within 3 and 5 years as the two outcomes. A gamma sensitivity analysis was performed. URM applicants represented 11% and 12% of discussed and not discussed applications, respectively. First-time R01 applicants resubmitting their original, unfunded R01 application were more successful obtaining R01 funding within 3 and 5 years than applicants submitting new applications—for both discussed and not discussed applications: discussed within 3 years (OR 4.17 [95 CI 3.53, 4.93]) and 5 years (3.33 [2.82–3.92]); and not discussed within 3 years (2.81 [2.52, 3.13]) and 5 years (2.47 [2.22–2.74]). URM applicants additionally benefited within 5 years for not discussed applications. CONCLUSIONS: Encouraging early career researchers applying as faculty at a school of medicine to resubmit R01 applications is a promising potential modifiable factor and intervention strategy. First-time R01 applicants who resubmitted their original, unfunded R01 application had log-odds of obtaining downstream R01 funding within 3 and 5 years 2–4 times higher than applicants who did not resubmit their original application and submitted new NIH applications instead. Findings held for both discussed and not discussed applications. Public Library of Science 2021-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8601543/ /pubmed/34793439 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257559 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) public domain dedication. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Doyle, Jamie Mihoko Baiocchi, Michael T. Kiernan, Michaela Downstream funding success of early career researchers for resubmitted versus new applications: A matched cohort |
title | Downstream funding success of early career researchers for resubmitted versus new applications: A matched cohort |
title_full | Downstream funding success of early career researchers for resubmitted versus new applications: A matched cohort |
title_fullStr | Downstream funding success of early career researchers for resubmitted versus new applications: A matched cohort |
title_full_unstemmed | Downstream funding success of early career researchers for resubmitted versus new applications: A matched cohort |
title_short | Downstream funding success of early career researchers for resubmitted versus new applications: A matched cohort |
title_sort | downstream funding success of early career researchers for resubmitted versus new applications: a matched cohort |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8601543/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34793439 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257559 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT doylejamiemihoko downstreamfundingsuccessofearlycareerresearchersforresubmittedversusnewapplicationsamatchedcohort AT baiocchimichaelt downstreamfundingsuccessofearlycareerresearchersforresubmittedversusnewapplicationsamatchedcohort AT kiernanmichaela downstreamfundingsuccessofearlycareerresearchersforresubmittedversusnewapplicationsamatchedcohort |