Cargando…

Downstream funding success of early career researchers for resubmitted versus new applications: A matched cohort

BACKGROUND: Early career researchers face a hypercompetitive funding environment. To help identify effective intervention strategies for early career researchers, we examined whether first-time NIH R01 applicants who resubmitted their original, unfunded R01 application were more successful at obtain...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Doyle, Jamie Mihoko, Baiocchi, Michael T., Kiernan, Michaela
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8601543/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34793439
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257559
_version_ 1784601375178489856
author Doyle, Jamie Mihoko
Baiocchi, Michael T.
Kiernan, Michaela
author_facet Doyle, Jamie Mihoko
Baiocchi, Michael T.
Kiernan, Michaela
author_sort Doyle, Jamie Mihoko
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Early career researchers face a hypercompetitive funding environment. To help identify effective intervention strategies for early career researchers, we examined whether first-time NIH R01 applicants who resubmitted their original, unfunded R01 application were more successful at obtaining any R01 funding within 3 and 5 years than original, unfunded applicants who submitted new NIH applications, and we examined whether underrepresented minority (URM) applicants differentially benefited from resubmission. Our observational study is consistent with an NIH working group’s recommendations to develop interventions to encourage resubmission. METHODS AND FINDINGS: First-time applicants with US medical school academic faculty appointments who submitted an unfunded R01 application between 2000–2014 yielded 4,789 discussed and 7,019 not discussed applications. We then created comparable groups of first-time R01 applicants (resubmitted original R01 application or submitted new NIH applications) using optimal full matching that included applicant and application characteristics. Primary and subgroup analyses used generalized mixed models with obtaining any NIH R01 funding within 3 and 5 years as the two outcomes. A gamma sensitivity analysis was performed. URM applicants represented 11% and 12% of discussed and not discussed applications, respectively. First-time R01 applicants resubmitting their original, unfunded R01 application were more successful obtaining R01 funding within 3 and 5 years than applicants submitting new applications—for both discussed and not discussed applications: discussed within 3 years (OR 4.17 [95 CI 3.53, 4.93]) and 5 years (3.33 [2.82–3.92]); and not discussed within 3 years (2.81 [2.52, 3.13]) and 5 years (2.47 [2.22–2.74]). URM applicants additionally benefited within 5 years for not discussed applications. CONCLUSIONS: Encouraging early career researchers applying as faculty at a school of medicine to resubmit R01 applications is a promising potential modifiable factor and intervention strategy. First-time R01 applicants who resubmitted their original, unfunded R01 application had log-odds of obtaining downstream R01 funding within 3 and 5 years 2–4 times higher than applicants who did not resubmit their original application and submitted new NIH applications instead. Findings held for both discussed and not discussed applications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8601543
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86015432021-11-19 Downstream funding success of early career researchers for resubmitted versus new applications: A matched cohort Doyle, Jamie Mihoko Baiocchi, Michael T. Kiernan, Michaela PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Early career researchers face a hypercompetitive funding environment. To help identify effective intervention strategies for early career researchers, we examined whether first-time NIH R01 applicants who resubmitted their original, unfunded R01 application were more successful at obtaining any R01 funding within 3 and 5 years than original, unfunded applicants who submitted new NIH applications, and we examined whether underrepresented minority (URM) applicants differentially benefited from resubmission. Our observational study is consistent with an NIH working group’s recommendations to develop interventions to encourage resubmission. METHODS AND FINDINGS: First-time applicants with US medical school academic faculty appointments who submitted an unfunded R01 application between 2000–2014 yielded 4,789 discussed and 7,019 not discussed applications. We then created comparable groups of first-time R01 applicants (resubmitted original R01 application or submitted new NIH applications) using optimal full matching that included applicant and application characteristics. Primary and subgroup analyses used generalized mixed models with obtaining any NIH R01 funding within 3 and 5 years as the two outcomes. A gamma sensitivity analysis was performed. URM applicants represented 11% and 12% of discussed and not discussed applications, respectively. First-time R01 applicants resubmitting their original, unfunded R01 application were more successful obtaining R01 funding within 3 and 5 years than applicants submitting new applications—for both discussed and not discussed applications: discussed within 3 years (OR 4.17 [95 CI 3.53, 4.93]) and 5 years (3.33 [2.82–3.92]); and not discussed within 3 years (2.81 [2.52, 3.13]) and 5 years (2.47 [2.22–2.74]). URM applicants additionally benefited within 5 years for not discussed applications. CONCLUSIONS: Encouraging early career researchers applying as faculty at a school of medicine to resubmit R01 applications is a promising potential modifiable factor and intervention strategy. First-time R01 applicants who resubmitted their original, unfunded R01 application had log-odds of obtaining downstream R01 funding within 3 and 5 years 2–4 times higher than applicants who did not resubmit their original application and submitted new NIH applications instead. Findings held for both discussed and not discussed applications. Public Library of Science 2021-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8601543/ /pubmed/34793439 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257559 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) public domain dedication.
spellingShingle Research Article
Doyle, Jamie Mihoko
Baiocchi, Michael T.
Kiernan, Michaela
Downstream funding success of early career researchers for resubmitted versus new applications: A matched cohort
title Downstream funding success of early career researchers for resubmitted versus new applications: A matched cohort
title_full Downstream funding success of early career researchers for resubmitted versus new applications: A matched cohort
title_fullStr Downstream funding success of early career researchers for resubmitted versus new applications: A matched cohort
title_full_unstemmed Downstream funding success of early career researchers for resubmitted versus new applications: A matched cohort
title_short Downstream funding success of early career researchers for resubmitted versus new applications: A matched cohort
title_sort downstream funding success of early career researchers for resubmitted versus new applications: a matched cohort
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8601543/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34793439
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257559
work_keys_str_mv AT doylejamiemihoko downstreamfundingsuccessofearlycareerresearchersforresubmittedversusnewapplicationsamatchedcohort
AT baiocchimichaelt downstreamfundingsuccessofearlycareerresearchersforresubmittedversusnewapplicationsamatchedcohort
AT kiernanmichaela downstreamfundingsuccessofearlycareerresearchersforresubmittedversusnewapplicationsamatchedcohort