Cargando…

Microtomographic reconstruction of mandibular defects treated with xenografts and collagen-based membranes: A pre-clinical minipig model

BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was to evaluate hard tissue response following guided bone regeneration using commercially available bovine bone grafts and collagen membranes; bilayer collagen membrane and porcine pericardium-based membrane, by means of a non-destructive three-dimensional (3D) co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gomez, Juliana, Bergamo, Edmara T-P, Tovar, Nick, Talib, Huzefa S, Pippenger, Benjamin E, Herdia, Valeria, Cox, Madison, Coelho, Paulo G, Witek, Lukasz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medicina Oral S.L. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8601645/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34564687
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.24811
_version_ 1784601400325439488
author Gomez, Juliana
Bergamo, Edmara T-P
Tovar, Nick
Talib, Huzefa S
Pippenger, Benjamin E
Herdia, Valeria
Cox, Madison
Coelho, Paulo G
Witek, Lukasz
author_facet Gomez, Juliana
Bergamo, Edmara T-P
Tovar, Nick
Talib, Huzefa S
Pippenger, Benjamin E
Herdia, Valeria
Cox, Madison
Coelho, Paulo G
Witek, Lukasz
author_sort Gomez, Juliana
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was to evaluate hard tissue response following guided bone regeneration using commercially available bovine bone grafts and collagen membranes; bilayer collagen membrane and porcine pericardium-based membrane, by means of a non-destructive three-dimensional (3D) computerized volumetric analysis following microtomography reconstruction. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Bone regenerative properties of various bovine bone graft materials were evaluated in the Göttingen minipig model. Two standardized intraosseous defects (15mm x 8mm x 8mm) were created bilaterally of the mandible of eighteen animals (n=72 defects). Groups were nested within the same subject and randomly distributed among the sites: (i) negative control (no graft and membrane), (ii) bovine bone graft/bilayer collagen membrane (BOB) (iii) Bio-Oss® bone graft/porcine pericardium-based membrane (BOJ) and (iv) cerabone® bone graft/porcine pericardium-based membrane (CJ). Samples were harvested at 4, 8, and 12-week time points (n=6 animal/time point). Segments were scanned using computerized microtomography (μCT) and three dimensionally reconstructed utilizing volumetric reconstruction software. Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS with a significance level of 5%. RESULTS: From a temporal perspective, tridimensional evaluation revealed gradual bone ingrowth with the presence of particulate bone grafts bridging the defect walls, and mandibular architecture preservation over time. Volumetric analysis demonstrated no significant difference between all groups at 4 weeks (p>0.127). At 8 and 12 weeks there was a higher percentage of new bone formation for control and CJ groups when compared to BOB and BOJ groups (p<0.039). The natural bovine bone graft group showed more potential for graft resorption over time relative to bovine bone graft, significantly different between 4 and 8 weeks (p<0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Volumetric analysis yielded a favorable mandible shape with respect to time through the beneficial balance between graft resorption/bone regenerative capacity for the natural bovine bone graft. Key words:3D reconstruction, microCT, grafting material, pre-clinical model.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8601645
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Medicina Oral S.L.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86016452021-11-24 Microtomographic reconstruction of mandibular defects treated with xenografts and collagen-based membranes: A pre-clinical minipig model Gomez, Juliana Bergamo, Edmara T-P Tovar, Nick Talib, Huzefa S Pippenger, Benjamin E Herdia, Valeria Cox, Madison Coelho, Paulo G Witek, Lukasz Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal Research BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was to evaluate hard tissue response following guided bone regeneration using commercially available bovine bone grafts and collagen membranes; bilayer collagen membrane and porcine pericardium-based membrane, by means of a non-destructive three-dimensional (3D) computerized volumetric analysis following microtomography reconstruction. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Bone regenerative properties of various bovine bone graft materials were evaluated in the Göttingen minipig model. Two standardized intraosseous defects (15mm x 8mm x 8mm) were created bilaterally of the mandible of eighteen animals (n=72 defects). Groups were nested within the same subject and randomly distributed among the sites: (i) negative control (no graft and membrane), (ii) bovine bone graft/bilayer collagen membrane (BOB) (iii) Bio-Oss® bone graft/porcine pericardium-based membrane (BOJ) and (iv) cerabone® bone graft/porcine pericardium-based membrane (CJ). Samples were harvested at 4, 8, and 12-week time points (n=6 animal/time point). Segments were scanned using computerized microtomography (μCT) and three dimensionally reconstructed utilizing volumetric reconstruction software. Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS with a significance level of 5%. RESULTS: From a temporal perspective, tridimensional evaluation revealed gradual bone ingrowth with the presence of particulate bone grafts bridging the defect walls, and mandibular architecture preservation over time. Volumetric analysis demonstrated no significant difference between all groups at 4 weeks (p>0.127). At 8 and 12 weeks there was a higher percentage of new bone formation for control and CJ groups when compared to BOB and BOJ groups (p<0.039). The natural bovine bone graft group showed more potential for graft resorption over time relative to bovine bone graft, significantly different between 4 and 8 weeks (p<0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Volumetric analysis yielded a favorable mandible shape with respect to time through the beneficial balance between graft resorption/bone regenerative capacity for the natural bovine bone graft. Key words:3D reconstruction, microCT, grafting material, pre-clinical model. Medicina Oral S.L. 2021-11 2021-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8601645/ /pubmed/34564687 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.24811 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Medicina Oral S.L. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Gomez, Juliana
Bergamo, Edmara T-P
Tovar, Nick
Talib, Huzefa S
Pippenger, Benjamin E
Herdia, Valeria
Cox, Madison
Coelho, Paulo G
Witek, Lukasz
Microtomographic reconstruction of mandibular defects treated with xenografts and collagen-based membranes: A pre-clinical minipig model
title Microtomographic reconstruction of mandibular defects treated with xenografts and collagen-based membranes: A pre-clinical minipig model
title_full Microtomographic reconstruction of mandibular defects treated with xenografts and collagen-based membranes: A pre-clinical minipig model
title_fullStr Microtomographic reconstruction of mandibular defects treated with xenografts and collagen-based membranes: A pre-clinical minipig model
title_full_unstemmed Microtomographic reconstruction of mandibular defects treated with xenografts and collagen-based membranes: A pre-clinical minipig model
title_short Microtomographic reconstruction of mandibular defects treated with xenografts and collagen-based membranes: A pre-clinical minipig model
title_sort microtomographic reconstruction of mandibular defects treated with xenografts and collagen-based membranes: a pre-clinical minipig model
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8601645/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34564687
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.24811
work_keys_str_mv AT gomezjuliana microtomographicreconstructionofmandibulardefectstreatedwithxenograftsandcollagenbasedmembranesapreclinicalminipigmodel
AT bergamoedmaratp microtomographicreconstructionofmandibulardefectstreatedwithxenograftsandcollagenbasedmembranesapreclinicalminipigmodel
AT tovarnick microtomographicreconstructionofmandibulardefectstreatedwithxenograftsandcollagenbasedmembranesapreclinicalminipigmodel
AT talibhuzefas microtomographicreconstructionofmandibulardefectstreatedwithxenograftsandcollagenbasedmembranesapreclinicalminipigmodel
AT pippengerbenjamine microtomographicreconstructionofmandibulardefectstreatedwithxenograftsandcollagenbasedmembranesapreclinicalminipigmodel
AT herdiavaleria microtomographicreconstructionofmandibulardefectstreatedwithxenograftsandcollagenbasedmembranesapreclinicalminipigmodel
AT coxmadison microtomographicreconstructionofmandibulardefectstreatedwithxenograftsandcollagenbasedmembranesapreclinicalminipigmodel
AT coelhopaulog microtomographicreconstructionofmandibulardefectstreatedwithxenograftsandcollagenbasedmembranesapreclinicalminipigmodel
AT witeklukasz microtomographicreconstructionofmandibulardefectstreatedwithxenograftsandcollagenbasedmembranesapreclinicalminipigmodel