Cargando…

Revisiting the effect of PCR replication and sequencing depth on biodiversity metrics in environmental DNA metabarcoding

Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding is an increasingly popular tool for measuring and cataloguing biodiversity. Because the environments and substrates in which DNA is preserved differ considerably, eDNA research often requires bespoke approaches to generating eDNA data. Here, we explore how two...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shirazi, Sabrina, Meyer, Rachel S., Shapiro, Beth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8601883/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34824788
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8239
_version_ 1784601448986705920
author Shirazi, Sabrina
Meyer, Rachel S.
Shapiro, Beth
author_facet Shirazi, Sabrina
Meyer, Rachel S.
Shapiro, Beth
author_sort Shirazi, Sabrina
collection PubMed
description Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding is an increasingly popular tool for measuring and cataloguing biodiversity. Because the environments and substrates in which DNA is preserved differ considerably, eDNA research often requires bespoke approaches to generating eDNA data. Here, we explore how two experimental choices in eDNA study design—the number of PCR replicates and the depth of sequencing of PCR replicates—influence the composition and consistency of taxa recovered from eDNA extracts. We perform 24 PCR replicates from each of six soil samples using two of the most common metabarcodes for Fungi and Viridiplantae (ITS1 and ITS2), and sequence each replicate to an average depth of ~84,000 reads. We find that PCR replicates are broadly consistent in composition and relative abundance of dominant taxa, but that low abundance taxa are often unique to one or a few PCR replicates. Taxa observed in one out of 24 PCR replicates make up 21–29% of the total taxa detected. We also observe that sequencing depth or rarefaction influences alpha diversity and beta diversity estimates. Read sampling depth influences local contribution to beta diversity, placement in ordinations, and beta dispersion in ordinations. Our results suggest that, because common taxa drive some alpha diversity estimates, few PCR replicates and low read sampling depths may be sufficient for many biological applications of eDNA metabarcoding. However, because rare taxa are recovered stochastically, eDNA metabarcoding may never fully recover the true amplifiable alpha diversity in an eDNA extract. Rare taxa drive PCR replicate outliers of alpha and beta diversity and lead to dispersion differences at different read sampling depths. We conclude that researchers should consider the complexity and unevenness of a community when choosing analytical approaches, read sampling depths, and filtering thresholds to arrive at stable estimates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8601883
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86018832021-11-24 Revisiting the effect of PCR replication and sequencing depth on biodiversity metrics in environmental DNA metabarcoding Shirazi, Sabrina Meyer, Rachel S. Shapiro, Beth Ecol Evol Research Articles Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding is an increasingly popular tool for measuring and cataloguing biodiversity. Because the environments and substrates in which DNA is preserved differ considerably, eDNA research often requires bespoke approaches to generating eDNA data. Here, we explore how two experimental choices in eDNA study design—the number of PCR replicates and the depth of sequencing of PCR replicates—influence the composition and consistency of taxa recovered from eDNA extracts. We perform 24 PCR replicates from each of six soil samples using two of the most common metabarcodes for Fungi and Viridiplantae (ITS1 and ITS2), and sequence each replicate to an average depth of ~84,000 reads. We find that PCR replicates are broadly consistent in composition and relative abundance of dominant taxa, but that low abundance taxa are often unique to one or a few PCR replicates. Taxa observed in one out of 24 PCR replicates make up 21–29% of the total taxa detected. We also observe that sequencing depth or rarefaction influences alpha diversity and beta diversity estimates. Read sampling depth influences local contribution to beta diversity, placement in ordinations, and beta dispersion in ordinations. Our results suggest that, because common taxa drive some alpha diversity estimates, few PCR replicates and low read sampling depths may be sufficient for many biological applications of eDNA metabarcoding. However, because rare taxa are recovered stochastically, eDNA metabarcoding may never fully recover the true amplifiable alpha diversity in an eDNA extract. Rare taxa drive PCR replicate outliers of alpha and beta diversity and lead to dispersion differences at different read sampling depths. We conclude that researchers should consider the complexity and unevenness of a community when choosing analytical approaches, read sampling depths, and filtering thresholds to arrive at stable estimates. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8601883/ /pubmed/34824788 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8239 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Shirazi, Sabrina
Meyer, Rachel S.
Shapiro, Beth
Revisiting the effect of PCR replication and sequencing depth on biodiversity metrics in environmental DNA metabarcoding
title Revisiting the effect of PCR replication and sequencing depth on biodiversity metrics in environmental DNA metabarcoding
title_full Revisiting the effect of PCR replication and sequencing depth on biodiversity metrics in environmental DNA metabarcoding
title_fullStr Revisiting the effect of PCR replication and sequencing depth on biodiversity metrics in environmental DNA metabarcoding
title_full_unstemmed Revisiting the effect of PCR replication and sequencing depth on biodiversity metrics in environmental DNA metabarcoding
title_short Revisiting the effect of PCR replication and sequencing depth on biodiversity metrics in environmental DNA metabarcoding
title_sort revisiting the effect of pcr replication and sequencing depth on biodiversity metrics in environmental dna metabarcoding
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8601883/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34824788
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8239
work_keys_str_mv AT shirazisabrina revisitingtheeffectofpcrreplicationandsequencingdepthonbiodiversitymetricsinenvironmentaldnametabarcoding
AT meyerrachels revisitingtheeffectofpcrreplicationandsequencingdepthonbiodiversitymetricsinenvironmentaldnametabarcoding
AT shapirobeth revisitingtheeffectofpcrreplicationandsequencingdepthonbiodiversitymetricsinenvironmentaldnametabarcoding