Cargando…
Drones, automatic counting tools, and artificial neural networks in wildlife population censusing
1. The use of a drone to count the flock sizes of 33 species of waterbirds during the breeding and non‐breeding periods was investigated. 2. In 96% of 343 cases, drone counting was successful. 18.8% of non‐breeding birds and 3.6% of breeding birds exhibited adverse reactions: the former birds were f...
Autor principal: | Marchowski, Dominik |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8601926/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34824822 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8302 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Seabird species vary in behavioural response to drone census
por: Brisson-Curadeau, Émile, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Virological Sampling of Inaccessible Wildlife with Drones
por: Geoghegan, Jemma L., et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Making the 2022 Rwanda Census count.
por: Shipsey, Rachel
Publicado: (2022) -
SignalFormer: Hybrid Transformer for Automatic Drone Identification Based on Drone RF Signals
por: Yan, Xiang, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
TrichomeYOLO: A Neural Network for Automatic Maize Trichome Counting
por: Xu, Jie, et al.
Publicado: (2023)