Cargando…

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced stage endometrial cancer: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE: While primary cytoreductive surgery (PCS) is considered the standard of care for women who present with stage IV endometrial cancer, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by interval cytoreductive surgery (ICS) has emerged as an alternative treatment strategy. We summarized the literat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Allan B., Wu, Jenny, Chen, Ling, Albright, Benjamin B., Previs, Rebecca A., Moss, Haley A., Davidson, Brittany A., Havrilesky, Laura J., Melamed, Alexander, Wright, Jason D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8601999/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34820496
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gore.2021.100887
_version_ 1784601480611758080
author Huang, Allan B.
Wu, Jenny
Chen, Ling
Albright, Benjamin B.
Previs, Rebecca A.
Moss, Haley A.
Davidson, Brittany A.
Havrilesky, Laura J.
Melamed, Alexander
Wright, Jason D.
author_facet Huang, Allan B.
Wu, Jenny
Chen, Ling
Albright, Benjamin B.
Previs, Rebecca A.
Moss, Haley A.
Davidson, Brittany A.
Havrilesky, Laura J.
Melamed, Alexander
Wright, Jason D.
author_sort Huang, Allan B.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: While primary cytoreductive surgery (PCS) is considered the standard of care for women who present with stage IV endometrial cancer, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by interval cytoreductive surgery (ICS) has emerged as an alternative treatment strategy. We summarized the literature and compared outcomes of PCS compared to NACT and ICS. METHODS: We conducted a systematic search on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus for articles published from January 1, 1990 to December 31, 2020. Key search terms included multiple descriptors of advanced disease status in combination with “endometrial cancer” and “neoadjuvant chemotherapy”. Our review included studies that examined survival and surgical outcomes of patients with stage III or IV endometrial cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval cytoreductive surgery versus those who received primary cytoreductive surgery. We excluded studies examining only patients with leiomyosarcomas, carcinosarcomas, and stromal sarcomas due to the biologic heterogeneity of these malignancies. RESULTS: The nine included studies encompassed 5,844 patients, of which 1,317 (22.5%) received NACT and 4,527 received PCS (77.5%). With the exception of a single study, all were retrospective observational studies or case series. Use of NACT in patients with stage IV EC increased from 16.0% in 2010 to 23.9% in 2015. Five studies analyzed median overall survival and all but one reported no significant difference between NACT + ICS vs. PCS. Optimal cytoreduction (<1 cm of residual disease) rates were similar across both treatment groups in three separate analyses, however pooled data suggest improved rates of optimal cytoreduction for NACT + ICS vs. PCS patients (81.9% vs. 51.5% respectively). Patients receiving NACT experienced significantly shorter hospital admissions and lower operative times compared to PCS counterparts. CONCLUSIONS: NACT followed by ICS reduces perioperative morbidity while offering similar overall survival.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8601999
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86019992021-11-23 Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced stage endometrial cancer: A systematic review Huang, Allan B. Wu, Jenny Chen, Ling Albright, Benjamin B. Previs, Rebecca A. Moss, Haley A. Davidson, Brittany A. Havrilesky, Laura J. Melamed, Alexander Wright, Jason D. Gynecol Oncol Rep Research Report OBJECTIVE: While primary cytoreductive surgery (PCS) is considered the standard of care for women who present with stage IV endometrial cancer, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by interval cytoreductive surgery (ICS) has emerged as an alternative treatment strategy. We summarized the literature and compared outcomes of PCS compared to NACT and ICS. METHODS: We conducted a systematic search on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus for articles published from January 1, 1990 to December 31, 2020. Key search terms included multiple descriptors of advanced disease status in combination with “endometrial cancer” and “neoadjuvant chemotherapy”. Our review included studies that examined survival and surgical outcomes of patients with stage III or IV endometrial cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval cytoreductive surgery versus those who received primary cytoreductive surgery. We excluded studies examining only patients with leiomyosarcomas, carcinosarcomas, and stromal sarcomas due to the biologic heterogeneity of these malignancies. RESULTS: The nine included studies encompassed 5,844 patients, of which 1,317 (22.5%) received NACT and 4,527 received PCS (77.5%). With the exception of a single study, all were retrospective observational studies or case series. Use of NACT in patients with stage IV EC increased from 16.0% in 2010 to 23.9% in 2015. Five studies analyzed median overall survival and all but one reported no significant difference between NACT + ICS vs. PCS. Optimal cytoreduction (<1 cm of residual disease) rates were similar across both treatment groups in three separate analyses, however pooled data suggest improved rates of optimal cytoreduction for NACT + ICS vs. PCS patients (81.9% vs. 51.5% respectively). Patients receiving NACT experienced significantly shorter hospital admissions and lower operative times compared to PCS counterparts. CONCLUSIONS: NACT followed by ICS reduces perioperative morbidity while offering similar overall survival. Elsevier 2021-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8601999/ /pubmed/34820496 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gore.2021.100887 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Report
Huang, Allan B.
Wu, Jenny
Chen, Ling
Albright, Benjamin B.
Previs, Rebecca A.
Moss, Haley A.
Davidson, Brittany A.
Havrilesky, Laura J.
Melamed, Alexander
Wright, Jason D.
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced stage endometrial cancer: A systematic review
title Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced stage endometrial cancer: A systematic review
title_full Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced stage endometrial cancer: A systematic review
title_fullStr Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced stage endometrial cancer: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced stage endometrial cancer: A systematic review
title_short Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced stage endometrial cancer: A systematic review
title_sort neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced stage endometrial cancer: a systematic review
topic Research Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8601999/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34820496
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gore.2021.100887
work_keys_str_mv AT huangallanb neoadjuvantchemotherapyforadvancedstageendometrialcancerasystematicreview
AT wujenny neoadjuvantchemotherapyforadvancedstageendometrialcancerasystematicreview
AT chenling neoadjuvantchemotherapyforadvancedstageendometrialcancerasystematicreview
AT albrightbenjaminb neoadjuvantchemotherapyforadvancedstageendometrialcancerasystematicreview
AT previsrebeccaa neoadjuvantchemotherapyforadvancedstageendometrialcancerasystematicreview
AT mosshaleya neoadjuvantchemotherapyforadvancedstageendometrialcancerasystematicreview
AT davidsonbrittanya neoadjuvantchemotherapyforadvancedstageendometrialcancerasystematicreview
AT havrileskylauraj neoadjuvantchemotherapyforadvancedstageendometrialcancerasystematicreview
AT melamedalexander neoadjuvantchemotherapyforadvancedstageendometrialcancerasystematicreview
AT wrightjasond neoadjuvantchemotherapyforadvancedstageendometrialcancerasystematicreview