Cargando…

Critical examination of current response shift methods and proposal for advancing new methods

PURPOSE: This work is part of an international, interdisciplinary initiative to synthesize research on response shift in results of patient-reported outcome measures. The objective is to critically examine current response shift methods. We additionally propose advancing new methods that address the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sébille, Véronique, Lix, Lisa M., Ayilara, Olawale F., Sajobi, Tolulope T., Janssens, A. Cecile J. W., Sawatzky, Richard, Sprangers, Mirjam A. G., Verdam, Mathilde G. E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8602164/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33595827
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02755-4
_version_ 1784601520300359680
author Sébille, Véronique
Lix, Lisa M.
Ayilara, Olawale F.
Sajobi, Tolulope T.
Janssens, A. Cecile J. W.
Sawatzky, Richard
Sprangers, Mirjam A. G.
Verdam, Mathilde G. E.
author_facet Sébille, Véronique
Lix, Lisa M.
Ayilara, Olawale F.
Sajobi, Tolulope T.
Janssens, A. Cecile J. W.
Sawatzky, Richard
Sprangers, Mirjam A. G.
Verdam, Mathilde G. E.
author_sort Sébille, Véronique
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This work is part of an international, interdisciplinary initiative to synthesize research on response shift in results of patient-reported outcome measures. The objective is to critically examine current response shift methods. We additionally propose advancing new methods that address the limitations of extant methods. METHODS: Based on literature reviews, this critical examination comprises design-based, qualitative, individualized, and preference-based methods, latent variable models, and other statistical methods. We critically appraised their definition, operationalization, the type of response shift they can detect, whether they can adjust for and explain response shift, their assumptions, and alternative explanations. Overall limitations requiring new methods were identified. RESULTS: We examined 11 methods that aim to operationalize response shift, by assessing change in the meaning of one’s self-evaluation. Six of these methods distinguish between change in observed measurements (observed change) and change in the construct that was intended to be measured (target change). The methods use either (sub)group-based or individual-level analysis, or a combination. All methods have underlying assumptions to be met and alternative explanations for the inferred response shift effects. We highlighted the need to address the interpretation of the results as response shift and proposed advancing new methods handling individual variation in change over time and multiple time points. CONCLUSION: No single response shift method is optimal; each method has strengths and limitations. Additionally, extra steps need to be taken to correctly interpret the results. Advancing new methods and conducting computer simulation studies that compare methods are recommended to move response shift research forward. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11136-020-02755-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8602164
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86021642021-12-03 Critical examination of current response shift methods and proposal for advancing new methods Sébille, Véronique Lix, Lisa M. Ayilara, Olawale F. Sajobi, Tolulope T. Janssens, A. Cecile J. W. Sawatzky, Richard Sprangers, Mirjam A. G. Verdam, Mathilde G. E. Qual Life Res Article PURPOSE: This work is part of an international, interdisciplinary initiative to synthesize research on response shift in results of patient-reported outcome measures. The objective is to critically examine current response shift methods. We additionally propose advancing new methods that address the limitations of extant methods. METHODS: Based on literature reviews, this critical examination comprises design-based, qualitative, individualized, and preference-based methods, latent variable models, and other statistical methods. We critically appraised their definition, operationalization, the type of response shift they can detect, whether they can adjust for and explain response shift, their assumptions, and alternative explanations. Overall limitations requiring new methods were identified. RESULTS: We examined 11 methods that aim to operationalize response shift, by assessing change in the meaning of one’s self-evaluation. Six of these methods distinguish between change in observed measurements (observed change) and change in the construct that was intended to be measured (target change). The methods use either (sub)group-based or individual-level analysis, or a combination. All methods have underlying assumptions to be met and alternative explanations for the inferred response shift effects. We highlighted the need to address the interpretation of the results as response shift and proposed advancing new methods handling individual variation in change over time and multiple time points. CONCLUSION: No single response shift method is optimal; each method has strengths and limitations. Additionally, extra steps need to be taken to correctly interpret the results. Advancing new methods and conducting computer simulation studies that compare methods are recommended to move response shift research forward. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11136-020-02755-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2021-02-17 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8602164/ /pubmed/33595827 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02755-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Sébille, Véronique
Lix, Lisa M.
Ayilara, Olawale F.
Sajobi, Tolulope T.
Janssens, A. Cecile J. W.
Sawatzky, Richard
Sprangers, Mirjam A. G.
Verdam, Mathilde G. E.
Critical examination of current response shift methods and proposal for advancing new methods
title Critical examination of current response shift methods and proposal for advancing new methods
title_full Critical examination of current response shift methods and proposal for advancing new methods
title_fullStr Critical examination of current response shift methods and proposal for advancing new methods
title_full_unstemmed Critical examination of current response shift methods and proposal for advancing new methods
title_short Critical examination of current response shift methods and proposal for advancing new methods
title_sort critical examination of current response shift methods and proposal for advancing new methods
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8602164/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33595827
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02755-4
work_keys_str_mv AT sebilleveronique criticalexaminationofcurrentresponseshiftmethodsandproposalforadvancingnewmethods
AT lixlisam criticalexaminationofcurrentresponseshiftmethodsandproposalforadvancingnewmethods
AT ayilaraolawalef criticalexaminationofcurrentresponseshiftmethodsandproposalforadvancingnewmethods
AT sajobitolulopet criticalexaminationofcurrentresponseshiftmethodsandproposalforadvancingnewmethods
AT janssensacecilejw criticalexaminationofcurrentresponseshiftmethodsandproposalforadvancingnewmethods
AT sawatzkyrichard criticalexaminationofcurrentresponseshiftmethodsandproposalforadvancingnewmethods
AT sprangersmirjamag criticalexaminationofcurrentresponseshiftmethodsandproposalforadvancingnewmethods
AT verdammathildege criticalexaminationofcurrentresponseshiftmethodsandproposalforadvancingnewmethods
AT criticalexaminationofcurrentresponseshiftmethodsandproposalforadvancingnewmethods