Cargando…
Critical examination of current response shift methods and proposal for advancing new methods
PURPOSE: This work is part of an international, interdisciplinary initiative to synthesize research on response shift in results of patient-reported outcome measures. The objective is to critically examine current response shift methods. We additionally propose advancing new methods that address the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8602164/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33595827 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02755-4 |
_version_ | 1784601520300359680 |
---|---|
author | Sébille, Véronique Lix, Lisa M. Ayilara, Olawale F. Sajobi, Tolulope T. Janssens, A. Cecile J. W. Sawatzky, Richard Sprangers, Mirjam A. G. Verdam, Mathilde G. E. |
author_facet | Sébille, Véronique Lix, Lisa M. Ayilara, Olawale F. Sajobi, Tolulope T. Janssens, A. Cecile J. W. Sawatzky, Richard Sprangers, Mirjam A. G. Verdam, Mathilde G. E. |
author_sort | Sébille, Véronique |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: This work is part of an international, interdisciplinary initiative to synthesize research on response shift in results of patient-reported outcome measures. The objective is to critically examine current response shift methods. We additionally propose advancing new methods that address the limitations of extant methods. METHODS: Based on literature reviews, this critical examination comprises design-based, qualitative, individualized, and preference-based methods, latent variable models, and other statistical methods. We critically appraised their definition, operationalization, the type of response shift they can detect, whether they can adjust for and explain response shift, their assumptions, and alternative explanations. Overall limitations requiring new methods were identified. RESULTS: We examined 11 methods that aim to operationalize response shift, by assessing change in the meaning of one’s self-evaluation. Six of these methods distinguish between change in observed measurements (observed change) and change in the construct that was intended to be measured (target change). The methods use either (sub)group-based or individual-level analysis, or a combination. All methods have underlying assumptions to be met and alternative explanations for the inferred response shift effects. We highlighted the need to address the interpretation of the results as response shift and proposed advancing new methods handling individual variation in change over time and multiple time points. CONCLUSION: No single response shift method is optimal; each method has strengths and limitations. Additionally, extra steps need to be taken to correctly interpret the results. Advancing new methods and conducting computer simulation studies that compare methods are recommended to move response shift research forward. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11136-020-02755-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8602164 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86021642021-12-03 Critical examination of current response shift methods and proposal for advancing new methods Sébille, Véronique Lix, Lisa M. Ayilara, Olawale F. Sajobi, Tolulope T. Janssens, A. Cecile J. W. Sawatzky, Richard Sprangers, Mirjam A. G. Verdam, Mathilde G. E. Qual Life Res Article PURPOSE: This work is part of an international, interdisciplinary initiative to synthesize research on response shift in results of patient-reported outcome measures. The objective is to critically examine current response shift methods. We additionally propose advancing new methods that address the limitations of extant methods. METHODS: Based on literature reviews, this critical examination comprises design-based, qualitative, individualized, and preference-based methods, latent variable models, and other statistical methods. We critically appraised their definition, operationalization, the type of response shift they can detect, whether they can adjust for and explain response shift, their assumptions, and alternative explanations. Overall limitations requiring new methods were identified. RESULTS: We examined 11 methods that aim to operationalize response shift, by assessing change in the meaning of one’s self-evaluation. Six of these methods distinguish between change in observed measurements (observed change) and change in the construct that was intended to be measured (target change). The methods use either (sub)group-based or individual-level analysis, or a combination. All methods have underlying assumptions to be met and alternative explanations for the inferred response shift effects. We highlighted the need to address the interpretation of the results as response shift and proposed advancing new methods handling individual variation in change over time and multiple time points. CONCLUSION: No single response shift method is optimal; each method has strengths and limitations. Additionally, extra steps need to be taken to correctly interpret the results. Advancing new methods and conducting computer simulation studies that compare methods are recommended to move response shift research forward. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11136-020-02755-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2021-02-17 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8602164/ /pubmed/33595827 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02755-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Sébille, Véronique Lix, Lisa M. Ayilara, Olawale F. Sajobi, Tolulope T. Janssens, A. Cecile J. W. Sawatzky, Richard Sprangers, Mirjam A. G. Verdam, Mathilde G. E. Critical examination of current response shift methods and proposal for advancing new methods |
title | Critical examination of current response shift methods and proposal for advancing new methods |
title_full | Critical examination of current response shift methods and proposal for advancing new methods |
title_fullStr | Critical examination of current response shift methods and proposal for advancing new methods |
title_full_unstemmed | Critical examination of current response shift methods and proposal for advancing new methods |
title_short | Critical examination of current response shift methods and proposal for advancing new methods |
title_sort | critical examination of current response shift methods and proposal for advancing new methods |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8602164/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33595827 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02755-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sebilleveronique criticalexaminationofcurrentresponseshiftmethodsandproposalforadvancingnewmethods AT lixlisam criticalexaminationofcurrentresponseshiftmethodsandproposalforadvancingnewmethods AT ayilaraolawalef criticalexaminationofcurrentresponseshiftmethodsandproposalforadvancingnewmethods AT sajobitolulopet criticalexaminationofcurrentresponseshiftmethodsandproposalforadvancingnewmethods AT janssensacecilejw criticalexaminationofcurrentresponseshiftmethodsandproposalforadvancingnewmethods AT sawatzkyrichard criticalexaminationofcurrentresponseshiftmethodsandproposalforadvancingnewmethods AT sprangersmirjamag criticalexaminationofcurrentresponseshiftmethodsandproposalforadvancingnewmethods AT verdammathildege criticalexaminationofcurrentresponseshiftmethodsandproposalforadvancingnewmethods AT criticalexaminationofcurrentresponseshiftmethodsandproposalforadvancingnewmethods |