Cargando…

Effects of low-level light therapy on dentin hypersensitivity: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the treatment efficacy of low-level light therapy on dentin hypersensitivity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Following the PRISMA guideline, six electronic databases supplemented with bibliographies were searched till December 2020. Two reviewers performed the screenings independen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shan, Zhiyi, Ji, Juanjuan, McGrath, Colman, Gu, Min, Yang, Yanqi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8602177/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34642786
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-04183-1
_version_ 1784601522549555200
author Shan, Zhiyi
Ji, Juanjuan
McGrath, Colman
Gu, Min
Yang, Yanqi
author_facet Shan, Zhiyi
Ji, Juanjuan
McGrath, Colman
Gu, Min
Yang, Yanqi
author_sort Shan, Zhiyi
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To investigate the treatment efficacy of low-level light therapy on dentin hypersensitivity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Following the PRISMA guideline, six electronic databases supplemented with bibliographies were searched till December 2020. Two reviewers performed the screenings independently with a reliability assessment. Studies fulfilling the pre-registered eligibility criteria were included for risk-of-bias assessment and data synthesis. RESULTS: Thirty-five articles ultimately informed this systematic review based on the eligibility criteria and underwent risk-of-bias assessment (ĸ = 0.86). Quantitative results were deduced by meta-analysis of 20 randomised controlled trials: LLLT showed favourable outcomes compared to placebos for immediate (SMD: 1.09, 95% CI: 0.47 to 1.70), interim (SMD: 1.32, 95% CI: 0.41 to 2.23), and persistent efficacies (SMD: 2.86, 95% CI: 1.98 to 3.74). However, substantial heterogeneity existed among included studies (I(2): 64–95%). Regarding comparisons with other desensitising strategies, LLLT showed no significant benefits in DH alleviation over others except fluorides for interim efficacy (SMD: 0.31, 95% CI: 0.10 to 0.52) and persistent efficacy (SMD: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.03 to 0.86). CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review shows that LLLT has positive immediate, interim, and persistent DH-treatment efficacies compared with placebo. No superior treatment effects of LLLT were observed except fluoride agent use. Further studies are warranted—RCTs with low risk of bias, consistent technical settings, comprehensive assessments, and long follow-up periods. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This systematic review bridges a critical research gap by analysing clinical evidence in the DH-alleviating efficacy of LLLT in comparison with placebo and other in-office desensitising strategies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00784-021-04183-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8602177
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86021772021-12-03 Effects of low-level light therapy on dentin hypersensitivity: a systematic review and meta-analysis Shan, Zhiyi Ji, Juanjuan McGrath, Colman Gu, Min Yang, Yanqi Clin Oral Investig Review OBJECTIVE: To investigate the treatment efficacy of low-level light therapy on dentin hypersensitivity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Following the PRISMA guideline, six electronic databases supplemented with bibliographies were searched till December 2020. Two reviewers performed the screenings independently with a reliability assessment. Studies fulfilling the pre-registered eligibility criteria were included for risk-of-bias assessment and data synthesis. RESULTS: Thirty-five articles ultimately informed this systematic review based on the eligibility criteria and underwent risk-of-bias assessment (ĸ = 0.86). Quantitative results were deduced by meta-analysis of 20 randomised controlled trials: LLLT showed favourable outcomes compared to placebos for immediate (SMD: 1.09, 95% CI: 0.47 to 1.70), interim (SMD: 1.32, 95% CI: 0.41 to 2.23), and persistent efficacies (SMD: 2.86, 95% CI: 1.98 to 3.74). However, substantial heterogeneity existed among included studies (I(2): 64–95%). Regarding comparisons with other desensitising strategies, LLLT showed no significant benefits in DH alleviation over others except fluorides for interim efficacy (SMD: 0.31, 95% CI: 0.10 to 0.52) and persistent efficacy (SMD: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.03 to 0.86). CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review shows that LLLT has positive immediate, interim, and persistent DH-treatment efficacies compared with placebo. No superior treatment effects of LLLT were observed except fluoride agent use. Further studies are warranted—RCTs with low risk of bias, consistent technical settings, comprehensive assessments, and long follow-up periods. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This systematic review bridges a critical research gap by analysing clinical evidence in the DH-alleviating efficacy of LLLT in comparison with placebo and other in-office desensitising strategies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00784-021-04183-1. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-10-13 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8602177/ /pubmed/34642786 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-04183-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review
Shan, Zhiyi
Ji, Juanjuan
McGrath, Colman
Gu, Min
Yang, Yanqi
Effects of low-level light therapy on dentin hypersensitivity: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Effects of low-level light therapy on dentin hypersensitivity: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Effects of low-level light therapy on dentin hypersensitivity: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Effects of low-level light therapy on dentin hypersensitivity: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Effects of low-level light therapy on dentin hypersensitivity: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Effects of low-level light therapy on dentin hypersensitivity: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort effects of low-level light therapy on dentin hypersensitivity: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8602177/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34642786
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-04183-1
work_keys_str_mv AT shanzhiyi effectsoflowlevellighttherapyondentinhypersensitivityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jijuanjuan effectsoflowlevellighttherapyondentinhypersensitivityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mcgrathcolman effectsoflowlevellighttherapyondentinhypersensitivityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT gumin effectsoflowlevellighttherapyondentinhypersensitivityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yangyanqi effectsoflowlevellighttherapyondentinhypersensitivityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis