Cargando…

One-splint versus two-splint technique in orthognathic surgery for class III asymmetry: comparison of patient-centred outcomes

OBJECTIVES: Two-jaw orthognathic surgery (OGS) is done using either the one-splint technique with free-hand positioning of the maxillomandibular complex or the two-splint technique with intermediate splints to position the maxilla. It is uncertain which technique achieves better outcomes. This study...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ng, Jing Hao, Chen, Ying-An, Hsieh, Yuh-Jia, Yao, Chuan-Fong, Liao, Yu-Fang, Chen, Yu-Ray
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8602230/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33948684
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-03967-9
_version_ 1784601534929043456
author Ng, Jing Hao
Chen, Ying-An
Hsieh, Yuh-Jia
Yao, Chuan-Fong
Liao, Yu-Fang
Chen, Yu-Ray
author_facet Ng, Jing Hao
Chen, Ying-An
Hsieh, Yuh-Jia
Yao, Chuan-Fong
Liao, Yu-Fang
Chen, Yu-Ray
author_sort Ng, Jing Hao
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Two-jaw orthognathic surgery (OGS) is done using either the one-splint technique with free-hand positioning of the maxillomandibular complex or the two-splint technique with intermediate splints to position the maxilla. It is uncertain which technique achieves better outcomes. This study compares frontal soft tissue symmetry and subjective patient QoL between one-splint and two-splint techniques in skeletal Class III asymmetry patients undergoing OGS with three-dimensional surgical planning. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective case-control study comprised 34 one-splint and 46 two-splint OGS patients. Frontal photographs and Orthognathic Quality of Life Questionnaire (OQLQ) were done pre- and post-treatment. Frontal soft tissue symmetry was analysed with the anthropometric Facial Symmetry Index. Measurements were compared with t-tests and chi-squared tests with p-value set at 0.05. RESULTS: The groups differed in pre-treatment ANB and OQLQ scores. The two-splint group showed significant improvement in all symmetry measures. The one-splint group showed significant improvement in all symmetry measures except midface deviation, upper contour deviation and the Facial Contour Symmetry Index. Both groups showed significant improvement in OQLQ scores. There were no significant differences in post-treatment symmetry measurements and OQLQ scores between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Although two-splint technique may better improve contour symmetry, there were no significant differences in frontal soft tissue symmetry and QoL after OGS in skeletal Class III asymmetry with either one-splint or two-splint technique, with both techniques resulting in significant improvement. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: One-splint and two-splint surgical techniques produce similar patient-centred outcomes in Class III asymmetry patients. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00784-021-03967-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8602230
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86022302021-12-03 One-splint versus two-splint technique in orthognathic surgery for class III asymmetry: comparison of patient-centred outcomes Ng, Jing Hao Chen, Ying-An Hsieh, Yuh-Jia Yao, Chuan-Fong Liao, Yu-Fang Chen, Yu-Ray Clin Oral Investig Original Article OBJECTIVES: Two-jaw orthognathic surgery (OGS) is done using either the one-splint technique with free-hand positioning of the maxillomandibular complex or the two-splint technique with intermediate splints to position the maxilla. It is uncertain which technique achieves better outcomes. This study compares frontal soft tissue symmetry and subjective patient QoL between one-splint and two-splint techniques in skeletal Class III asymmetry patients undergoing OGS with three-dimensional surgical planning. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective case-control study comprised 34 one-splint and 46 two-splint OGS patients. Frontal photographs and Orthognathic Quality of Life Questionnaire (OQLQ) were done pre- and post-treatment. Frontal soft tissue symmetry was analysed with the anthropometric Facial Symmetry Index. Measurements were compared with t-tests and chi-squared tests with p-value set at 0.05. RESULTS: The groups differed in pre-treatment ANB and OQLQ scores. The two-splint group showed significant improvement in all symmetry measures. The one-splint group showed significant improvement in all symmetry measures except midface deviation, upper contour deviation and the Facial Contour Symmetry Index. Both groups showed significant improvement in OQLQ scores. There were no significant differences in post-treatment symmetry measurements and OQLQ scores between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Although two-splint technique may better improve contour symmetry, there were no significant differences in frontal soft tissue symmetry and QoL after OGS in skeletal Class III asymmetry with either one-splint or two-splint technique, with both techniques resulting in significant improvement. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: One-splint and two-splint surgical techniques produce similar patient-centred outcomes in Class III asymmetry patients. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00784-021-03967-9. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-05-05 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8602230/ /pubmed/33948684 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-03967-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Ng, Jing Hao
Chen, Ying-An
Hsieh, Yuh-Jia
Yao, Chuan-Fong
Liao, Yu-Fang
Chen, Yu-Ray
One-splint versus two-splint technique in orthognathic surgery for class III asymmetry: comparison of patient-centred outcomes
title One-splint versus two-splint technique in orthognathic surgery for class III asymmetry: comparison of patient-centred outcomes
title_full One-splint versus two-splint technique in orthognathic surgery for class III asymmetry: comparison of patient-centred outcomes
title_fullStr One-splint versus two-splint technique in orthognathic surgery for class III asymmetry: comparison of patient-centred outcomes
title_full_unstemmed One-splint versus two-splint technique in orthognathic surgery for class III asymmetry: comparison of patient-centred outcomes
title_short One-splint versus two-splint technique in orthognathic surgery for class III asymmetry: comparison of patient-centred outcomes
title_sort one-splint versus two-splint technique in orthognathic surgery for class iii asymmetry: comparison of patient-centred outcomes
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8602230/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33948684
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-03967-9
work_keys_str_mv AT ngjinghao onesplintversustwosplinttechniqueinorthognathicsurgeryforclassiiiasymmetrycomparisonofpatientcentredoutcomes
AT chenyingan onesplintversustwosplinttechniqueinorthognathicsurgeryforclassiiiasymmetrycomparisonofpatientcentredoutcomes
AT hsiehyuhjia onesplintversustwosplinttechniqueinorthognathicsurgeryforclassiiiasymmetrycomparisonofpatientcentredoutcomes
AT yaochuanfong onesplintversustwosplinttechniqueinorthognathicsurgeryforclassiiiasymmetrycomparisonofpatientcentredoutcomes
AT liaoyufang onesplintversustwosplinttechniqueinorthognathicsurgeryforclassiiiasymmetrycomparisonofpatientcentredoutcomes
AT chenyuray onesplintversustwosplinttechniqueinorthognathicsurgeryforclassiiiasymmetrycomparisonofpatientcentredoutcomes