Cargando…
Clinical evaluation of single-swab sampling for rapid COVID-19 detection in outbreak settings in Dutch nursing homes
PURPOSE: To assess whether one swab can be used to perform both the antigen-detection rapid diagnostic test (Ag-RDT) and reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for COVID-19 detection during an outbreak in the nursing home (NH) setting. METHODS: The single-swab method (SSM), where t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8602523/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34797552 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41999-021-00584-3 |
_version_ | 1784601594277396480 |
---|---|
author | Paap, Kelly C. van Loon, Anouk M. Koene, Fleur M. van Buul, Laura W. Jurriaans, Suzanne Smalbrugge, Martin de Jong, Menno D. Hertogh, Cees M. P. M. |
author_facet | Paap, Kelly C. van Loon, Anouk M. Koene, Fleur M. van Buul, Laura W. Jurriaans, Suzanne Smalbrugge, Martin de Jong, Menno D. Hertogh, Cees M. P. M. |
author_sort | Paap, Kelly C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To assess whether one swab can be used to perform both the antigen-detection rapid diagnostic test (Ag-RDT) and reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for COVID-19 detection during an outbreak in the nursing home (NH) setting. METHODS: The single-swab method (SSM), where the Ag-RDT is performed with the transport medium used for RT-PCR, was evaluated in three Dutch NHs and compared to the laboratory setting. We collected Ag-RDT and RT-PCR results, NH resident characteristics and symptomatology. In addition, two focus groups were held with the involved care professionals to gain insight into the feasibility of the SMM in the NH setting. RESULTS: In the NH setting, the SSM had a sensitivity of 51% and a specificity of 89% compared to RT-PCR. These were lower than in the laboratory setting (69% and 100% respectively). Yet, when stratified for cycle threshold values, the sensitivity became comparable between the settings. Symptoms occurred more frequent in the Ag-RDT+ group than Ag-RDT− group. Resident characteristics did not differ between these groups. Based on the focus groups, the SSM was feasible to perform if certain requirements, such as availability of staff, equipment and proper training, were met. However, the rapid availability of the test results were perceived as a dilemma. CONCLUSION: The advantages and disadvantages need to be considered before implementation of the SSM can be recommended in the NH setting. For the vulnerable NH residents, it is important to find the right balance between effective testing policy and the burden this imposes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41999-021-00584-3. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8602523 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86025232021-11-19 Clinical evaluation of single-swab sampling for rapid COVID-19 detection in outbreak settings in Dutch nursing homes Paap, Kelly C. van Loon, Anouk M. Koene, Fleur M. van Buul, Laura W. Jurriaans, Suzanne Smalbrugge, Martin de Jong, Menno D. Hertogh, Cees M. P. M. Eur Geriatr Med Research Paper PURPOSE: To assess whether one swab can be used to perform both the antigen-detection rapid diagnostic test (Ag-RDT) and reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for COVID-19 detection during an outbreak in the nursing home (NH) setting. METHODS: The single-swab method (SSM), where the Ag-RDT is performed with the transport medium used for RT-PCR, was evaluated in three Dutch NHs and compared to the laboratory setting. We collected Ag-RDT and RT-PCR results, NH resident characteristics and symptomatology. In addition, two focus groups were held with the involved care professionals to gain insight into the feasibility of the SMM in the NH setting. RESULTS: In the NH setting, the SSM had a sensitivity of 51% and a specificity of 89% compared to RT-PCR. These were lower than in the laboratory setting (69% and 100% respectively). Yet, when stratified for cycle threshold values, the sensitivity became comparable between the settings. Symptoms occurred more frequent in the Ag-RDT+ group than Ag-RDT− group. Resident characteristics did not differ between these groups. Based on the focus groups, the SSM was feasible to perform if certain requirements, such as availability of staff, equipment and proper training, were met. However, the rapid availability of the test results were perceived as a dilemma. CONCLUSION: The advantages and disadvantages need to be considered before implementation of the SSM can be recommended in the NH setting. For the vulnerable NH residents, it is important to find the right balance between effective testing policy and the burden this imposes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41999-021-00584-3. Springer International Publishing 2021-11-19 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8602523/ /pubmed/34797552 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41999-021-00584-3 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to European Geriatric Medicine Society 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Paap, Kelly C. van Loon, Anouk M. Koene, Fleur M. van Buul, Laura W. Jurriaans, Suzanne Smalbrugge, Martin de Jong, Menno D. Hertogh, Cees M. P. M. Clinical evaluation of single-swab sampling for rapid COVID-19 detection in outbreak settings in Dutch nursing homes |
title | Clinical evaluation of single-swab sampling for rapid COVID-19 detection in outbreak settings in Dutch nursing homes |
title_full | Clinical evaluation of single-swab sampling for rapid COVID-19 detection in outbreak settings in Dutch nursing homes |
title_fullStr | Clinical evaluation of single-swab sampling for rapid COVID-19 detection in outbreak settings in Dutch nursing homes |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical evaluation of single-swab sampling for rapid COVID-19 detection in outbreak settings in Dutch nursing homes |
title_short | Clinical evaluation of single-swab sampling for rapid COVID-19 detection in outbreak settings in Dutch nursing homes |
title_sort | clinical evaluation of single-swab sampling for rapid covid-19 detection in outbreak settings in dutch nursing homes |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8602523/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34797552 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41999-021-00584-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT paapkellyc clinicalevaluationofsingleswabsamplingforrapidcovid19detectioninoutbreaksettingsindutchnursinghomes AT vanloonanoukm clinicalevaluationofsingleswabsamplingforrapidcovid19detectioninoutbreaksettingsindutchnursinghomes AT koenefleurm clinicalevaluationofsingleswabsamplingforrapidcovid19detectioninoutbreaksettingsindutchnursinghomes AT vanbuullauraw clinicalevaluationofsingleswabsamplingforrapidcovid19detectioninoutbreaksettingsindutchnursinghomes AT jurriaanssuzanne clinicalevaluationofsingleswabsamplingforrapidcovid19detectioninoutbreaksettingsindutchnursinghomes AT smalbruggemartin clinicalevaluationofsingleswabsamplingforrapidcovid19detectioninoutbreaksettingsindutchnursinghomes AT dejongmennod clinicalevaluationofsingleswabsamplingforrapidcovid19detectioninoutbreaksettingsindutchnursinghomes AT hertoghceesmpm clinicalevaluationofsingleswabsamplingforrapidcovid19detectioninoutbreaksettingsindutchnursinghomes |