Cargando…

Effectiveness and Safety of DOACs vs. VKAs in AF Patients With Cancer: Evidence From Randomized Clinical Trials and Observational Studies

Background: The use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) is recommended as the preferred treatment drug in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the effectiveness and safety of DOACs compared with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in patients with cancer and AF are still controver...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Fuwei, Xu, Zixuan, Luo, Jun, Yu, Peng, Ma, Jianyong, Yuan, Ping, Zhu, Wengen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8602680/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34805320
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.766377
_version_ 1784601621222653952
author Liu, Fuwei
Xu, Zixuan
Luo, Jun
Yu, Peng
Ma, Jianyong
Yuan, Ping
Zhu, Wengen
author_facet Liu, Fuwei
Xu, Zixuan
Luo, Jun
Yu, Peng
Ma, Jianyong
Yuan, Ping
Zhu, Wengen
author_sort Liu, Fuwei
collection PubMed
description Background: The use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) is recommended as the preferred treatment drug in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the effectiveness and safety of DOACs compared with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in patients with cancer and AF are still controversial. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis regarding the effectiveness and safety of DOACs vs. VKAs in AF patients with cancer. Methods: A search of the Pubmed and EMBASE databases until August 2021 was performed. Adjusted risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using a random-effects model with an inverse variance method. Results: Thirteen studies were deemed to meet the criteria. For the effectiveness outcomes, the use of DOACs compared with VKAs use was significantly associated with decreased risks of stroke or systemic embolism (RR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.54–0.80) and venous thromboembolism (RR = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.26–0.61), but not ischemic stroke (RR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.56–1.11), myocardial infarction (RR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.56–1.11), cardiovascular death (RR = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.53–1.09), and all-cause death (RR = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.43–1.56). For the safety outcomes, compared with VKAs use, the use of DOACs was associated with reduced risks of intracranial bleeding (RR = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.50–0.71) and gastrointestinal bleeding (RR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.80–0.95). There were no significant differences in major bleeding (RR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.74–1.04), major or nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding (RR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.74–1.01), and any bleeding (RR = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.76–1.03). Conclusion: Compared with VKAs, DOACs appeared to have significant reductions in stroke or systemic embolism, venous thromboembolism, intracranial bleeding, and gastrointestinal bleeding, but comparable risks of ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, cardiovascular death, all-cause death, major bleeding, major or nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding, and any bleeding in patients with AF and cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8602680
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86026802021-11-20 Effectiveness and Safety of DOACs vs. VKAs in AF Patients With Cancer: Evidence From Randomized Clinical Trials and Observational Studies Liu, Fuwei Xu, Zixuan Luo, Jun Yu, Peng Ma, Jianyong Yuan, Ping Zhu, Wengen Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine Background: The use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) is recommended as the preferred treatment drug in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the effectiveness and safety of DOACs compared with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in patients with cancer and AF are still controversial. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis regarding the effectiveness and safety of DOACs vs. VKAs in AF patients with cancer. Methods: A search of the Pubmed and EMBASE databases until August 2021 was performed. Adjusted risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using a random-effects model with an inverse variance method. Results: Thirteen studies were deemed to meet the criteria. For the effectiveness outcomes, the use of DOACs compared with VKAs use was significantly associated with decreased risks of stroke or systemic embolism (RR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.54–0.80) and venous thromboembolism (RR = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.26–0.61), but not ischemic stroke (RR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.56–1.11), myocardial infarction (RR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.56–1.11), cardiovascular death (RR = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.53–1.09), and all-cause death (RR = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.43–1.56). For the safety outcomes, compared with VKAs use, the use of DOACs was associated with reduced risks of intracranial bleeding (RR = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.50–0.71) and gastrointestinal bleeding (RR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.80–0.95). There were no significant differences in major bleeding (RR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.74–1.04), major or nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding (RR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.74–1.01), and any bleeding (RR = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.76–1.03). Conclusion: Compared with VKAs, DOACs appeared to have significant reductions in stroke or systemic embolism, venous thromboembolism, intracranial bleeding, and gastrointestinal bleeding, but comparable risks of ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, cardiovascular death, all-cause death, major bleeding, major or nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding, and any bleeding in patients with AF and cancer. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8602680/ /pubmed/34805320 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.766377 Text en Copyright © 2021 Liu, Xu, Luo, Yu, Ma, Yuan and Zhu. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
Liu, Fuwei
Xu, Zixuan
Luo, Jun
Yu, Peng
Ma, Jianyong
Yuan, Ping
Zhu, Wengen
Effectiveness and Safety of DOACs vs. VKAs in AF Patients With Cancer: Evidence From Randomized Clinical Trials and Observational Studies
title Effectiveness and Safety of DOACs vs. VKAs in AF Patients With Cancer: Evidence From Randomized Clinical Trials and Observational Studies
title_full Effectiveness and Safety of DOACs vs. VKAs in AF Patients With Cancer: Evidence From Randomized Clinical Trials and Observational Studies
title_fullStr Effectiveness and Safety of DOACs vs. VKAs in AF Patients With Cancer: Evidence From Randomized Clinical Trials and Observational Studies
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness and Safety of DOACs vs. VKAs in AF Patients With Cancer: Evidence From Randomized Clinical Trials and Observational Studies
title_short Effectiveness and Safety of DOACs vs. VKAs in AF Patients With Cancer: Evidence From Randomized Clinical Trials and Observational Studies
title_sort effectiveness and safety of doacs vs. vkas in af patients with cancer: evidence from randomized clinical trials and observational studies
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8602680/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34805320
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.766377
work_keys_str_mv AT liufuwei effectivenessandsafetyofdoacsvsvkasinafpatientswithcancerevidencefromrandomizedclinicaltrialsandobservationalstudies
AT xuzixuan effectivenessandsafetyofdoacsvsvkasinafpatientswithcancerevidencefromrandomizedclinicaltrialsandobservationalstudies
AT luojun effectivenessandsafetyofdoacsvsvkasinafpatientswithcancerevidencefromrandomizedclinicaltrialsandobservationalstudies
AT yupeng effectivenessandsafetyofdoacsvsvkasinafpatientswithcancerevidencefromrandomizedclinicaltrialsandobservationalstudies
AT majianyong effectivenessandsafetyofdoacsvsvkasinafpatientswithcancerevidencefromrandomizedclinicaltrialsandobservationalstudies
AT yuanping effectivenessandsafetyofdoacsvsvkasinafpatientswithcancerevidencefromrandomizedclinicaltrialsandobservationalstudies
AT zhuwengen effectivenessandsafetyofdoacsvsvkasinafpatientswithcancerevidencefromrandomizedclinicaltrialsandobservationalstudies