Cargando…

Minimal Residual Disease Prior to and After Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Children and Adolescents With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia: What Level of Negativity Is Relevant?

Minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment plays a central role in risk stratification and treatment guidance in paediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL). As such, MRD prior to haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a major factor that is independently correlated with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Merli, Pietro, Ifversen, Marianne, Truong, Tony H., Marquart, Hanne V., Buechner, Jochen, Wölfl, Matthias, Bader, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8602790/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34805054
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2021.777108
_version_ 1784601633388232704
author Merli, Pietro
Ifversen, Marianne
Truong, Tony H.
Marquart, Hanne V.
Buechner, Jochen
Wölfl, Matthias
Bader, Peter
author_facet Merli, Pietro
Ifversen, Marianne
Truong, Tony H.
Marquart, Hanne V.
Buechner, Jochen
Wölfl, Matthias
Bader, Peter
author_sort Merli, Pietro
collection PubMed
description Minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment plays a central role in risk stratification and treatment guidance in paediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL). As such, MRD prior to haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a major factor that is independently correlated with outcome. High burden of MRD is negatively correlated with post-transplant survival, as both the risk of leukaemia recurrence and non-relapse mortality increase with greater levels of MRD. Despite growing evidence supporting these findings, controversies still exist. In particular, it is still not clear whether multiparameter flow cytometry and real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction, which is used to recognise immunoglobulin and T-cell receptor gene rearrangements, can be employed interchangeably. Moreover, the higher sensitivity in MRD quantification offered by next-generation sequencing techniques may further refine the ability to stratify transplant-associated risks. While MRD quantification from bone marrow prior to HSCT remains the state of the art, heavily pre-treated patients may benefit from additional staging, such as using (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography to detect focal residues of disease. Additionally, the timing of MRD detection (i.e., immediately before administration of the conditioning regimen or weeks before) is a matter of debate. Pre-transplant MRD negativity has previously been associated with superior outcomes; however, in the recent For Omitting Radiation Under Majority age (FORUM) study, pre-HSCT MRD positivity was associated with neither relapse risk nor survival. In this review, we discuss the level of MRD that may require pre-transplant therapy intensification, risking time delay and complications (as well as losing the window for HSCT if disease progression occurs), as opposed to an adapted post-transplant strategy to achieve long-term remission. Indeed, MRD monitoring may be a valuable tool to guide individualised treatment decisions, including tapering of immunosuppression, cellular therapies (such as donor lymphocyte infusions) or additional immunotherapy (such as bispecific T-cell engagers or chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8602790
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86027902021-11-20 Minimal Residual Disease Prior to and After Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Children and Adolescents With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia: What Level of Negativity Is Relevant? Merli, Pietro Ifversen, Marianne Truong, Tony H. Marquart, Hanne V. Buechner, Jochen Wölfl, Matthias Bader, Peter Front Pediatr Pediatrics Minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment plays a central role in risk stratification and treatment guidance in paediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL). As such, MRD prior to haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a major factor that is independently correlated with outcome. High burden of MRD is negatively correlated with post-transplant survival, as both the risk of leukaemia recurrence and non-relapse mortality increase with greater levels of MRD. Despite growing evidence supporting these findings, controversies still exist. In particular, it is still not clear whether multiparameter flow cytometry and real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction, which is used to recognise immunoglobulin and T-cell receptor gene rearrangements, can be employed interchangeably. Moreover, the higher sensitivity in MRD quantification offered by next-generation sequencing techniques may further refine the ability to stratify transplant-associated risks. While MRD quantification from bone marrow prior to HSCT remains the state of the art, heavily pre-treated patients may benefit from additional staging, such as using (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography to detect focal residues of disease. Additionally, the timing of MRD detection (i.e., immediately before administration of the conditioning regimen or weeks before) is a matter of debate. Pre-transplant MRD negativity has previously been associated with superior outcomes; however, in the recent For Omitting Radiation Under Majority age (FORUM) study, pre-HSCT MRD positivity was associated with neither relapse risk nor survival. In this review, we discuss the level of MRD that may require pre-transplant therapy intensification, risking time delay and complications (as well as losing the window for HSCT if disease progression occurs), as opposed to an adapted post-transplant strategy to achieve long-term remission. Indeed, MRD monitoring may be a valuable tool to guide individualised treatment decisions, including tapering of immunosuppression, cellular therapies (such as donor lymphocyte infusions) or additional immunotherapy (such as bispecific T-cell engagers or chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy). Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8602790/ /pubmed/34805054 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2021.777108 Text en Copyright © 2021 Merli, Ifversen, Truong, Marquart, Buechner, Wölfl and Bader. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pediatrics
Merli, Pietro
Ifversen, Marianne
Truong, Tony H.
Marquart, Hanne V.
Buechner, Jochen
Wölfl, Matthias
Bader, Peter
Minimal Residual Disease Prior to and After Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Children and Adolescents With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia: What Level of Negativity Is Relevant?
title Minimal Residual Disease Prior to and After Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Children and Adolescents With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia: What Level of Negativity Is Relevant?
title_full Minimal Residual Disease Prior to and After Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Children and Adolescents With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia: What Level of Negativity Is Relevant?
title_fullStr Minimal Residual Disease Prior to and After Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Children and Adolescents With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia: What Level of Negativity Is Relevant?
title_full_unstemmed Minimal Residual Disease Prior to and After Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Children and Adolescents With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia: What Level of Negativity Is Relevant?
title_short Minimal Residual Disease Prior to and After Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Children and Adolescents With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia: What Level of Negativity Is Relevant?
title_sort minimal residual disease prior to and after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in children and adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: what level of negativity is relevant?
topic Pediatrics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8602790/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34805054
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2021.777108
work_keys_str_mv AT merlipietro minimalresidualdiseasepriortoandafterhaematopoieticstemcelltransplantationinchildrenandadolescentswithacutelymphoblasticleukaemiawhatlevelofnegativityisrelevant
AT ifversenmarianne minimalresidualdiseasepriortoandafterhaematopoieticstemcelltransplantationinchildrenandadolescentswithacutelymphoblasticleukaemiawhatlevelofnegativityisrelevant
AT truongtonyh minimalresidualdiseasepriortoandafterhaematopoieticstemcelltransplantationinchildrenandadolescentswithacutelymphoblasticleukaemiawhatlevelofnegativityisrelevant
AT marquarthannev minimalresidualdiseasepriortoandafterhaematopoieticstemcelltransplantationinchildrenandadolescentswithacutelymphoblasticleukaemiawhatlevelofnegativityisrelevant
AT buechnerjochen minimalresidualdiseasepriortoandafterhaematopoieticstemcelltransplantationinchildrenandadolescentswithacutelymphoblasticleukaemiawhatlevelofnegativityisrelevant
AT wolflmatthias minimalresidualdiseasepriortoandafterhaematopoieticstemcelltransplantationinchildrenandadolescentswithacutelymphoblasticleukaemiawhatlevelofnegativityisrelevant
AT baderpeter minimalresidualdiseasepriortoandafterhaematopoieticstemcelltransplantationinchildrenandadolescentswithacutelymphoblasticleukaemiawhatlevelofnegativityisrelevant