Cargando…
Use of COVID-19 evidence in humanitarian settings: the need for dynamic guidance adapted to changing humanitarian crisis contexts
BACKGROUND: For humanitarian organisations to respond effectively to complex crises, they require access to up-to-date evidence-based guidance. The COVID-19 crisis has highlighted the importance of updating global guidance to context-specific and evolving needs in humanitarian settings. Our study ai...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8602975/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34798877 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13031-021-00418-w |
_version_ | 1784601677010042880 |
---|---|
author | Odlum, Alex James, Rosemary Mahieu, Audrey Blanchet, Karl Altare, Chiara Singh, Neha Spiegel, Paul |
author_facet | Odlum, Alex James, Rosemary Mahieu, Audrey Blanchet, Karl Altare, Chiara Singh, Neha Spiegel, Paul |
author_sort | Odlum, Alex |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: For humanitarian organisations to respond effectively to complex crises, they require access to up-to-date evidence-based guidance. The COVID-19 crisis has highlighted the importance of updating global guidance to context-specific and evolving needs in humanitarian settings. Our study aimed to understand the use of evidence-based guidance in humanitarian responses during COVID-19. Primary data collected during the rapidly evolving pandemic sheds new light on evidence-use processes in humanitarian response. METHODS: We collected and analysed COVID-19 guidance documents, and conducted semi-structured interviews remotely with a variety of humanitarian organisations responding and adapting to the COVID-19 pandemic. We used the COVID-19 Humanitarian platform, a website established by three universities in March 2020, to solicit, collate and document these experiences and knowledge. RESULTS: We analysed 131 guidance documents and conducted 80 interviews with humanitarian organisations, generating 61 published field experiences. Although COVID-19 guidance was quickly developed and disseminated in the initial phases of the crisis (from January to May 2020), updates or ongoing revision of the guidance has been limited. Interviews conducted between April and September 2020 showed that humanitarian organisations have responded to COVID-19 in innovative and context-specific ways, but have often had to adapt existing guidance to inform their operations in complex humanitarian settings. CONCLUSIONS: Experiences from the field indicate that humanitarian organisations consulted guidance to respond and adapt to COVID-19, but whether referring to available guidance indicates evidence use depends on its accessibility, coherence, contextual relevance and trustworthiness. Feedback loops through online platforms like the COVID-19 Humanitarian platform that relay details of these evidence-use processes to global guidance setters could improve future humanitarian response. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8602975 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86029752021-11-19 Use of COVID-19 evidence in humanitarian settings: the need for dynamic guidance adapted to changing humanitarian crisis contexts Odlum, Alex James, Rosemary Mahieu, Audrey Blanchet, Karl Altare, Chiara Singh, Neha Spiegel, Paul Confl Health Research BACKGROUND: For humanitarian organisations to respond effectively to complex crises, they require access to up-to-date evidence-based guidance. The COVID-19 crisis has highlighted the importance of updating global guidance to context-specific and evolving needs in humanitarian settings. Our study aimed to understand the use of evidence-based guidance in humanitarian responses during COVID-19. Primary data collected during the rapidly evolving pandemic sheds new light on evidence-use processes in humanitarian response. METHODS: We collected and analysed COVID-19 guidance documents, and conducted semi-structured interviews remotely with a variety of humanitarian organisations responding and adapting to the COVID-19 pandemic. We used the COVID-19 Humanitarian platform, a website established by three universities in March 2020, to solicit, collate and document these experiences and knowledge. RESULTS: We analysed 131 guidance documents and conducted 80 interviews with humanitarian organisations, generating 61 published field experiences. Although COVID-19 guidance was quickly developed and disseminated in the initial phases of the crisis (from January to May 2020), updates or ongoing revision of the guidance has been limited. Interviews conducted between April and September 2020 showed that humanitarian organisations have responded to COVID-19 in innovative and context-specific ways, but have often had to adapt existing guidance to inform their operations in complex humanitarian settings. CONCLUSIONS: Experiences from the field indicate that humanitarian organisations consulted guidance to respond and adapt to COVID-19, but whether referring to available guidance indicates evidence use depends on its accessibility, coherence, contextual relevance and trustworthiness. Feedback loops through online platforms like the COVID-19 Humanitarian platform that relay details of these evidence-use processes to global guidance setters could improve future humanitarian response. BioMed Central 2021-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8602975/ /pubmed/34798877 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13031-021-00418-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Odlum, Alex James, Rosemary Mahieu, Audrey Blanchet, Karl Altare, Chiara Singh, Neha Spiegel, Paul Use of COVID-19 evidence in humanitarian settings: the need for dynamic guidance adapted to changing humanitarian crisis contexts |
title | Use of COVID-19 evidence in humanitarian settings: the need for dynamic guidance adapted to changing humanitarian crisis contexts |
title_full | Use of COVID-19 evidence in humanitarian settings: the need for dynamic guidance adapted to changing humanitarian crisis contexts |
title_fullStr | Use of COVID-19 evidence in humanitarian settings: the need for dynamic guidance adapted to changing humanitarian crisis contexts |
title_full_unstemmed | Use of COVID-19 evidence in humanitarian settings: the need for dynamic guidance adapted to changing humanitarian crisis contexts |
title_short | Use of COVID-19 evidence in humanitarian settings: the need for dynamic guidance adapted to changing humanitarian crisis contexts |
title_sort | use of covid-19 evidence in humanitarian settings: the need for dynamic guidance adapted to changing humanitarian crisis contexts |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8602975/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34798877 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13031-021-00418-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT odlumalex useofcovid19evidenceinhumanitariansettingstheneedfordynamicguidanceadaptedtochanginghumanitariancrisiscontexts AT jamesrosemary useofcovid19evidenceinhumanitariansettingstheneedfordynamicguidanceadaptedtochanginghumanitariancrisiscontexts AT mahieuaudrey useofcovid19evidenceinhumanitariansettingstheneedfordynamicguidanceadaptedtochanginghumanitariancrisiscontexts AT blanchetkarl useofcovid19evidenceinhumanitariansettingstheneedfordynamicguidanceadaptedtochanginghumanitariancrisiscontexts AT altarechiara useofcovid19evidenceinhumanitariansettingstheneedfordynamicguidanceadaptedtochanginghumanitariancrisiscontexts AT singhneha useofcovid19evidenceinhumanitariansettingstheneedfordynamicguidanceadaptedtochanginghumanitariancrisiscontexts AT spiegelpaul useofcovid19evidenceinhumanitariansettingstheneedfordynamicguidanceadaptedtochanginghumanitariancrisiscontexts |